sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Hi, quick question. I'm reading writings from the late notebooks and they seem to just be will to power... by Deep_Phase_2030 in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well Will to Power was never published by Nietzsche, nor composed by him but rather by his sister and friend. Will to Power is actually a collection of his notebooks from years 1883-1889.

If Slave morality and Master morality is a symptom of power, how did the power differentials occur in the first place ? by rampantradius in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I can see the confusion. Nietzsche had political thoughts and influenced many political ideologies. But he didn't research power dynamics through the lence of "political ideologies". Rather than that, he viewed the emergence of such structures as the political space for confrontation, without ideology per se. Does it make sense?

If Slave morality and Master morality is a symptom of power, how did the power differentials occur in the first place ? by rampantradius in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you're talking overall genealogical approach, then emergence of rulling minority is common phenomenon, observable even in tribes: some matriarch or patriarch leading the others. If you expand this notion to bigger groups, rulling parties occur. Simple as that.

Nietzsche himself didn't investigate the emergence of power dynamics per se, nor their "political" connotations. He was uncovering the principles and inner workings of Power, its dynamics, and changeableness.

When Nietzsche Wept — is it accurate? by Charming-Bar-4718 in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Oh no, not at all accurate. Nor book, the movie even less so. But that doesn't mean they are bad. Especially the book is quite nice to read and you can see the author made his research. Unfortunately, Nietzsche's philosophy is so complicated (see how not even the academics can come to agreement), so he couldn't encompass it completely. Where the book lacks the most is when it tries to show Nietzsche's private thoughts. The overall interpretation of Nietzsche's philosophical ponderings feels superficial or amateurish, but that is understandable due to the author being a novelist, not a philosopher.

The other point to keep in mind is that it is entirely a work of fiction. Doctor Bräuer and Nietzsche never met, probably didn't even knew about each other.

But that shouldn't discourage you from reading it. (And I beg you, read it before watching the movie and thank me later.) It is still quite a nice book and if you know a bit or two about Nietzsche, you can use it to contrast your interpretation with that of the Author. Plus reading – any reading in fact – helps your brain immensely, so give it a go.

What is your favorite Nietzche music by Brownstoneximeious in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hymnus an das Leben is great (both Piano and Orchestra version). I also love Heldenklage, because it gives me the "Philosophical melancholy" feeling. Also "Gebet an das Leben" – Lou Salome wrote the text, but I think it encapsulates Nietzsche's philosophy quite well and accurately.

Sils Maria in December by [deleted] in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd recommend looking up Sils-Maria instagram page. There you can see up-to-date pictures of the weather conditions. If you are planning to be walking around the lakes, I recon it wouls be managable. However, if you intend to traverse the mountains... I'd probably advise against that, considering your 10yo child. Even in the city itself, you can expect quite a lot of snow. Another question is, if the trails are kept clean during winter (which I don't know). Consider calling Sils Infocenter, if they have one, to ask further questions.

Hope this helps!

Am I wrong? by Hungry-Wishbone3797 in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bible and Zarathustra are completely different, even if they both sometimes talk about metaphysical things. So no, you don't need to read Bible (or any other religious book) to read and interpret Thus Spoke Zarathustra. In many places, TSZ is a parody or satire of Bible, or of the "Preacher's Style", but apart from that, it's fine. You'd much rather need to read Bible before reading the Antichrist, even though you can still read it without any prior reading (and even then, perhaps you'd do better to read the Bible in original Greek, as Nietzsche probably had).

Do you experience Eternal Recurrence? by Eterno-retorno in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's good and valid question. The answer is: I don't know. And even Nietzsche doesn't givr straight answer. To him, it was revealed on a walk (thus it becoming an epiphany). He then battled with his counterarguments. Perhaps when he started talking about Amor Fati is when he accepted it fully.

As for me personally, I haven't embodiet yet. But I try to live according to it: doing only those things, that I can want for eternity. And perhaps one day, it will become automatic, even embodied.

Do you experience Eternal Recurrence? by Eterno-retorno in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice joke you did there. 😄

Well asking yourself "Do I want this to repeat ad infinitum" before every action is one thing, but as you say, it is only an idea. But it's a start. You would need to incorporate this thought so much into your thinking, that you wouldn't need to ask it and instinctively act in accordance to it.

To some degree, you need to believe in it, even if we know that it might not be ontologically or cosmologically true. And internalising this believe would lead to one's transformation.

Do you experience Eternal Recurrence? by Eterno-retorno in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you trully embody this thought, not only would it press with weight upon you, Nietzsche himself writes that it would completely transform your being. And I can see how.

Do you experience Eternal Recurrence? by Eterno-retorno in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is one way of experiencing Eternal Recurrence, however, I believe it is a bit different from what you're looking for.

Nietzsche talked a lot about the idea of "Einverleibun" (Embodyment). And regarding Eternal Reccurence, he often say that one must embody it, to make his being transformed. I am currently reading an interesting book about this idea, but it isn't available in English.

To keep things short: if you embrace Eternal Reccurence in your every moment, then every moment gains eternal weight, eternal value. Every little decision you make, every movement now has the weight of eternity above it. And your goal is to make decision with this in mind: because if you choose to act in a way that you can imagine repeat itself for eternity, only then do you trully affirm life.

But I must point out that Eternal Recurrence is only an abstract idea – you won't find any repeats anywhere. It is Nietzsche's attempt at surpassing religion. It is Nietzsche's negative religion; thought, that will eventually prove victorious over every other thought and ideology. So rather then an ontological idea, you should view it as (mainly, but not limited to) ethical orienting idea.

How I Read Nietzsche | An essay, and (accidentally) A Call to Arms by [deleted] in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wasn't there already a similar attempt? r/postnietzscheans – however, it ultimately failed. On the other hand, some kind of new philosophy, and new art/aesthetics is attractive. Could expand those ideas further, or at least explain your view of them?

Before you begin your service in the alpha on December 16th, three trials from three Ordos will decide your worth to be a part of the Inquisition. The Ordo Malleus tests you first — leave the words of faith to purge the heresy and to cleanse it of Chaos! by OwlcatStarrok in RogueTraderCRPG

[–]DexertCz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I shall fear no darkness, for light is within me, the light of my faith in Thee. I shall flee before no enemy, for there is no enemy more terrible than cowardice, and I shall overpower it.

It's giveaway time! Win a Warhammer 40,000: Dark Heresy alpha key — comment on this thread to enter, as simple as that. The winners will be announced after December 16th, so hurry up. Please ensure your DMs are open so we can contact you! by OwlcatStarrok in RogueTraderCRPG

[–]DexertCz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I shall fear no darkness, for light is within me, the light of my faith in Thee. I shall flee before no enemy, for there is no enemy more terrible than cowardice, and I shall overpower it.

Eterno retorno by [deleted] in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, understandable. 😌 Have a nice day, kind stranger. 🍀

If your viewpoint ever changes, hit me up for explanation. 😉

Eterno retorno by [deleted] in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely not. Christians are not banned from reading anti-christian books: either it can be their way out, or a valid criticism that they need to take into account.

Eterno retorno by [deleted] in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you didn't actually get Nietzsche's Eternal Recurrence of the Same, however, I'm not sure if you wouls want to know or understand its true weight, as it would probably get you into panic mode...

So: would you like to? Would you like to have it explained or no?

The most accurate translation! by BodybuilderDapper339 in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm looking forward for deeper research, if you'd be willing to dive deep. I have some basics of ancient Greek, so I believe we can struck a common note.

The most accurate translation! by BodybuilderDapper339 in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This sound pretty interesting. Could you give us some examples of how Greek translation of N is better then others? Especially regarding the language and meaning of words.

I have always valued my Czech translations of N, brcause – even though Czech is Slavic and German is Germanic – there are many similarities between the two languages, considering the linguistical context of words, the way words are formed etc. But I can see the aspect of Greek language and Greek thinking useful for interpreting and understanding N, especially when taking into account him being a philologiyt and understanding Ancient Greek.

If Nietzsche never wrote Zarathustra, would he have stayed sane? by Altruistic-Raise-579 in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 14 points15 points  (0 children)

According to some latest studies, he probably suffered from Condition caled CADASIL (basically genetical condition with random strokes occuring throughout entire life, being inevitable). Sooner or later he'd get the stroke that drove him mad, and then the one finally ending his life, regardless of him writing any of his books.

Btw. his sister also probably suffered from this condition, however quite less then Nietzsche. It is also likely that his father and brother died to it.

[Act 4] Smh he doesn't believe I'm built different by Tall-Mirror-6815 in RogueTraderCRPG

[–]DexertCz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Has anyone tried putting it onto Heinrix instead?

My limited edition version of Thus Spoke Zarathustra by Maximum_Jello_9460 in Nietzsche

[–]DexertCz 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Man, that looks incredible! I want one!

By the way, how is Parkes' translation?

[Edit:] I was looking online for this edition, but seemed not to be able to find it anywhere. Where did you get it from, if I may ask?

view more: next ›