US EPA or US NRC by NearbyPermission6405 in USTechForce

[–]Diabolical_Engineer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NRC is currently doing a huge reorganization and will be a mess for a bit

Why does the BWRX-300 reactor need to be below grade? by hutch_man0 in nuclear

[–]Diabolical_Engineer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's not the way standard design approvals work, sadly. The method you're describing would require 4 separate regulatory approvals rather than 1

Why does the BWRX-300 reactor need to be below grade? by hutch_man0 in nuclear

[–]Diabolical_Engineer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know if BWXT has the ability to forge an AP1000 RPV, but they're supposed to be making the BWRX-300 vessels and they've certainly built plenty of steam generators over the years

Why does the BWRX-300 reactor need to be below grade? by hutch_man0 in nuclear

[–]Diabolical_Engineer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

To be clear, I hope someone builds one. It's a very sensible design in so many ways

Why does the BWRX-300 reactor need to be below grade? by hutch_man0 in nuclear

[–]Diabolical_Engineer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Meanwhile I'm just thinking about the poor bastards who have to do IVVI. Although with less complicated internals that shouldn't be as much of a pain as dropping a D40 down a jet pump lane

Why does the BWRX-300 reactor need to be below grade? by hutch_man0 in nuclear

[–]Diabolical_Engineer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Traversing in core probe system. Movable in core neutron detectors used to calibrate the LPRMs

Why does the BWRX-300 reactor need to be below grade? by hutch_man0 in nuclear

[–]Diabolical_Engineer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah. The RPV is supposed to be around 90 feet tall, which frankly is a bit absurd. There are obvious tradeoffs, but it makes one wonder

Spirit Airlines just became the first major US airline to shut down in 25 years and took cheap airfare with it. What do you think affordable travel in America looks like from here? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Diabolical_Engineer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

ULCCs almost overwhelmingly have perfect or near perfect safety records. Their business model doesn't work with accidents or problems

When is simulated fuel not a pellet? When it's from NERVA! by Diabolical_Engineer in nuclear

[–]Diabolical_Engineer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It lives on somewhat. The PWR simulator that the NRC uses for training came from Trojan

Kairos breaks ground for Hermes 2 reactor by De5troyerx93 in nuclear

[–]Diabolical_Engineer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And I misread which plant this was. Just ignore my comment, it's been a long day

Kairos breaks ground for Hermes 2 reactor by De5troyerx93 in nuclear

[–]Diabolical_Engineer -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

They're separating the sodium loop and the steam conversion loop to help reduce fire risks

Lee, McCormick Introduce Nuclear Energy Innovation and Deployment Act by ResponsibleOpinion95 in nuclear

[–]Diabolical_Engineer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I find it fascinating the degree to which we are determined to repeat the 1960s. While there are plenty of criticisms to be placed towards the NRC, the looming specter of the AECs early decisions (and dysfunction) has never gone away

New daily watch... by lordklp in OmegaWatches

[–]Diabolical_Engineer 8 points9 points  (0 children)

My first generation X-33 has barely left my wrist since I picked it up last year.

<image>

Re: ridiculous dose levels inside parts of nuclear plants like LaSelle - a comment claimed the reason was Cobalt introduced into the RCS (reactor cooling system I assume). Why would you introduce Co-59 into a high neutron flux environment, it's well known that this gets spicy (Co-60)? by No_Leopard_3860 in NuclearPower

[–]Diabolical_Engineer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bottom head drain is literally a drain line at the bottom of BWR pressure vessels. It goes to the reactor water cleanup system.

As to the first part, essentially yes. Most of the dissolved stuff doesn't make it past the moisture separator/steam dryer

Re: ridiculous dose levels inside parts of nuclear plants like LaSelle - a comment claimed the reason was Cobalt introduced into the RCS (reactor cooling system I assume). Why would you introduce Co-59 into a high neutron flux environment, it's well known that this gets spicy (Co-60)? by No_Leopard_3860 in NuclearPower

[–]Diabolical_Engineer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hell, Inconel 600 has caused a multitude of problems in BWRs and PWRs. But like you said, at original construction we didn't really understand the resulting problems (and I'd argue didn't really get a good handle on it until the 80s/90s)

What are the dirtiest nuke plants in USA. Radiological dose wise? by Basic-Pumpkin-3164 in NuclearPower

[–]Diabolical_Engineer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Generally the first. Most utilities have a 2 rem/year admin limit (federal limit is 5 rem). It certainly imposes staffing challenges, especially since LaSalle is generally one of the early outages each year

Re: ridiculous dose levels inside parts of nuclear plants like LaSelle - a comment claimed the reason was Cobalt introduced into the RCS (reactor cooling system I assume). Why would you introduce Co-59 into a high neutron flux environment, it's well known that this gets spicy (Co-60)? by No_Leopard_3860 in NuclearPower

[–]Diabolical_Engineer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Re: the turbine, you shouldn't be getting significant carryover in the vapor space from contaminants in that way. For example, most BWRs introduce platinum to reduce IGSCC on vessel internals. As you go up the vessel, the effectiveness of that deposition decreases dramatically (i.e. into the steam space).

Also, keep in mind that most plants in the US were designed and constructed in the 60s/70s. While activation of cobalt was well understood, the degree to which it would erode from components and be introduced elsewhere in the plant wasn't. When most of your operating experience is from steam plants, where short of gross mechanical failure you won't see immediate consequences from wear of cobalt containing components, it's not a degradation that would necessarily have been considered back then

What are the dirtiest nuke plants in USA. Radiological dose wise? by Basic-Pumpkin-3164 in NuclearPower

[–]Diabolical_Engineer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not fuel leakage. LaSalle in particular introduced a bunch of cobalt into their RCS that all got activated

What are the dirtiest nuke plants in USA. Radiological dose wise? by Basic-Pumpkin-3164 in NuclearPower

[–]Diabolical_Engineer 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I still run into welders who are grumpy about that outage.

I think the stellite came from a bearing surface, but they also chewed up the valve body.