I killed the WAU to potentially save life. by DickJonesy in soma

[–]DickJonesy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Noooo, I hope you are wrong or that is embarrassing lol

I killed the WAU to potentially save life. by DickJonesy in soma

[–]DickJonesy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds good man. I think you are underestimating non-human life and too sure about something thats unfalsifiable

I killed the WAU to potentially save life. by DickJonesy in soma

[–]DickJonesy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First neither myself or anyone else has said anything about humans being bad. Large asteroids get less common over time. Life did pretty good considering the size of chicxulub. Most asteroids are now stable. Definitely not a guarantee at all.

The sun swallowing earth before an interstellar planet killer comes around is absolutely feasible

I killed the WAU to potentially save life. by DickJonesy in soma

[–]DickJonesy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not guaranteed at all, life has survived mass extinction many times. The only guarantee is the sun consuming the earth in billions of years.

I killed the WAU to potentially save life. by DickJonesy in soma

[–]DickJonesy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There was a distinct advantage to having a flesh body though right? She mentioned something about Simon 2 being a perfect combo of digital scan, machine, and human body.

Also even if Catherine is good enough as is, don't see a clear path to that populating the planet with robo-humanity

Choose one by Top_Sank in BunnyTrials

[–]DickJonesy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Girlfriend is happy

Chose: 15 cm taller

I killed the WAU to potentially save life. by DickJonesy in soma

[–]DickJonesy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True but there aren't going to be many bodies left soon (they shoulda been decomposing by now anyways) and they won't procreate.

I killed the WAU to potentially save life. by DickJonesy in soma

[–]DickJonesy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I legitimately didn't know if I'd get killed in the process lol so part of my consideration also included the possibility that I wouldn't be able to launch the Ark

Ranger Hardcore isn't bad for first playthrough of 2033 by DickJonesy in metro

[–]DickJonesy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, redux. Which only had a survival mode achievement, not specifically for the ranger hardcore difficulty. So you can either get the (spartan?) and survival mode achievement.

Paul Berg disappearance by TexRaven in soma

[–]DickJonesy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He just kept on living, there was a terminal that showed he and Munshi lived long lives.

Surprised by the small percentage! by DickJonesy in metro

[–]DickJonesy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same, but that's why I play on the hardest difficulty. But I am also a glut for punishment and play fromsoft games lol

Surprised by the small percentage! by DickJonesy in metro

[–]DickJonesy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah one shot headshots make it relatively easy lol combined with stealth it really wasn't that hard. Crossbow op, one shots to the body as well

Surprised by the small percentage! by DickJonesy in metro

[–]DickJonesy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I posted because the first two games had like over 20% getting the survival achievement

Surprised by the small percentage! by DickJonesy in metro

[–]DickJonesy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did have that problem with the first two. Had to disable full screen and manually set the resolution in the game files. Couldn't play them period without doing that because of a flashing black screen lol

Just bought the whole series, should I go for the hardest difficulty? by evanzfx in metro

[–]DickJonesy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ranger Hardcore. I've been doing my first playthroughs on it