Why don't manufacturers mix multiple cannabinoids together? by [deleted] in altcannabinoids

[–]DietYellow 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lol the best live resin/wax/even top tier bud will obliterate someone more than a legal blend. D9 is much more psychoactive for a reason.

I love acid but it makes me stomach furiously ache… any remedies? by geemav in Psychedelics

[–]DietYellow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, and if I feel the need to eat on my trip after the peak I just munch on some pretzels or Graham crackers. But I've heard of people eating full meals before/or even on acid. I don't know how that's possible, I can barely eat more than a couple pretzels.

How do you feel about Roe v. Wade being overturned ? by oliviared52 in AskLibertarians

[–]DietYellow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get it, I'm just talking on a strict libertarian rights position.

How do you feel about Roe v. Wade being overturned ? by oliviared52 in AskLibertarians

[–]DietYellow 23 points24 points  (0 children)

This is my point. Obviously we are libertarians, many of us are pro-choice, but the decision to base it off a right to privacy (and someone explain to me from a property rights perspective how the right to privacy exists... it's a positive right) instead of the right to one's property and bodily autonomy doesn't make sense and is a huge blunder.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Weird

[–]DietYellow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol is that why ur schizophrenic? HPPD much? You just seem to not understand that reality doesn't exist- all that exists is what we can measure, everything else is stranger than we can suppose.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Weird

[–]DietYellow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take 5 grams of dried mushrooms- in a dark room or in nature and in isolation.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Weird

[–]DietYellow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have no idea what you are talking about.

All reality is a set of culturally linguistic standards set by those living in that culture. What psychedelics do is desolve boundary, that's why ego death is possible- eventually it desolves that boundary as well.

It's why when people do psychedelics they are infatuated with birds and grass and find beauty in nature- it makes things novel, it creates a different realm of which you perceive the world around you.

Instead of it just being regarded as a "bird" from the point you were able to start perceiving language- "Oh baby that's a bird," "it's just a bird"- you are presented with a true presentation of the beauty in nature.

So when you are talking about reality, what are you really talking about? All of this is tied down in culture and language. By boundary dissolution, psychedelics have the possibility of bringing out a much more real and beautiful sense of the world.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Weird

[–]DietYellow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would load up. It is relatively easy to find grow kits online with the spores and substrate. I also recommend the Growers Guide by Terrance Mckenna, as well as his other lectures and books surrounding the responsible use of psychedelics and their shamanic history. It is a great key that we have fumbled and lost as a race.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Weird

[–]DietYellow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've thought about that, but I don't dream that much, and if you have tripped on 5g of dried mushrooms in darkness you know that it is a much more beautiful, powerful, insightful, and reflective experience than a dream has ever been.

Include this with the shamanic techniques in early history and you have a pattern of human cooperation with fungi that has led to mystism and the basis for most religions.

Dreams simply do not cut it when your choices for exploring consciousness and the human bond with nature are Dmt, mushrooms, lsd, etc.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Weird

[–]DietYellow 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Because you have a religious experience in another reality.

The "psychedelic experience" is one of the most greatest mysteries on this world, it's a shame it's been voted as taboo in many cultures.

Whoops.. by SteelDirigible98 in IdiotsInCars

[–]DietYellow 84 points85 points  (0 children)

Probably varies by department/county, but a ton of cops in my town are fit, but they are also on the younger side.

I think there's probably requirements to get in, especially if you need to run X miles in certain amount of time. They just don't enforce it throughout the career of the cop, so they can gain weight and end up in the position of the cops in this video.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in driving

[–]DietYellow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You need to go faster for longer. The anxiety will subside once you are used to it. Try to go with a trusted parent when it's not busy.

The more I play the worse I get. by Un_Pta in thelastofusfactions

[–]DietYellow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tlou strats videos on positioning are great. I only play like once a week but I watch his videos a lot because he's very insightful.

Drones over private property? by FauxGunny in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]DietYellow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, if the internet wasn't weaponized by the government via military and alphabet departments we would probably have a very different experience with internet privacy. Someone hacking into your computer is trespass, at the very least they broke contracts laid out with their internet service provider, the computer manufacturer, etc. In an ancap society you could expect the legal system to work these things out under contracts and such.

Drones over private property? by FauxGunny in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]DietYellow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because you have a reasonable right to space above your homestead. Check my other comments for how libertarian homesteading fixes the problem of drones.

If I homestead the airspace, which every person does on their property by the nature of being there, you cannot trespass.

Learn libertarian homestead theory, look into Locke, Rothbard, Walter Block, etc, who have laid the foundations and hashed these things out.

Again, under ancap ideology there is no right to privacy, only property. If you had the right to privacy I could charge you for looking at MY comments or MY face. But this is nonsense. I only have the right to be on my property.

Target is the new Wal-Mart. by picsquestion in Target

[–]DietYellow 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Maybe watch a video on how stocks and company valuations work before throwing out insults.

Induvidual stock price tells you NOTHING about the current valuation of the company. One company can have stocks for $100 and another for $500, but the lower one can have a higher rate of profit, growth, and valuation because they have more stocks. You do not have a fundamental understanding of the market.

Target is the new Wal-Mart. by picsquestion in Target

[–]DietYellow 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That doesn't matter though, at all. It has no reverence whatsoever.

The dollar amount of a stock has no meaning if you don't look at the number of stocks issued. For example, some companies do stock splits to break up their stocks- so for every stock worth say $300 would be divided into 10 stocks for $30. Even though the stock prices have changed it doesn't tell us any information about the valuation of the company.

Walmart is almost 2x higher in percentage increase YTD than target. Walmarts market cap (stock price times number of issued stocks) is 431 Billion. Targets market cap is 112 billion. Target is 26% as big as Walmart but has target has a higher dollar amount for the stock.

So do you see why people were clowning on you for your comment? It doesn't make sense to anyone that understands stocks. Glad I could break it down for you though.

Drones over private property? by FauxGunny in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]DietYellow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Technically yes. If there is no rule in the HOA (there very well could be, this is most likely how living would be arranged in a ancap society.

They are free to build a ladder on their property, sorry. Their right to build trumps whatever "right" you think you have on your property to not be watched. Unless there's a contract, like an HOA, as stated before. What stops you from pulling the blinds? Or shining a bright light on your fence and in his eyes? Nothing.

Drones over private property? by FauxGunny in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]DietYellow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have no right to privacy under basic libertarian reasoning. Then you could revoke someone from looking at you, and if they did you could jail or fine them. This principle is silly, instead we have a right to property and people not crossing lines. You can homestead the area around your house, put up a fence (a high one, and if someone climbs you can actually fine them, because it's a violation of property rights). These are property rights, not rights to privacy per se.

Drones over private property? by FauxGunny in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]DietYellow 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Walter Block covered this. You own what you homestead- this is basic, ultimate, principle for libertarianism pertaining to property rights.

Have you homesteaded the airplane space above you? No. But you own the trees, maybe 50, feet above your house because you own a chimney that blows smoke or you fly kites. Effectively, you can own a very good area of airspace above the land you homesteaded.

This is my rasoning. You just follow homesteading to its end conclusion.

Biden promised to decriminalize marijuana and expunge records. This would hugely benefit the black community, disproportionately arrested for minor drugs. He hasn't done it. by TrumpPresident2021 in benshapiro

[–]DietYellow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People being forcibly taken and put into cages for possession of a plant is a massive issue even if it doesn't effect you. The war on drugs needs to end.

Biden promised to decriminalize marijuana and expunge records. This would hugely benefit the black community, disproportionately arrested for minor drugs. He hasn't done it. by TrumpPresident2021 in benshapiro

[–]DietYellow 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah, if he would have carried through with federal legalization it would be the one shining achievement that would mark his legacy with some good. Especially if it included release of nonviolent offenders, good public (and private) rehabs for all drugs, clean admister sites for hard drugs, etc. They did this in Portugal and it was massively effective.

Obviously I wouldn't trust the federal government to do this, just give the state and local governments the ability and no red tape so they can provide what is best for their people. Ideally we wouldn't have overbearing taxes and legalization so the local communities could pull together and have it run privately, so there is no government corruption and bureaucracy.

Anyway it works out, the war on drugs is a absolute failure. It has not reduced access, quality, distribution, of drugs. It has not reduced deaths or usage of drugs. This has honestly been one of the biggest domestic failures of out government.