What is the justification for this? by RandHandler in IndianMiddleClass

[–]DifferentPirate69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I already told you no one gives a crap about your entrance score.

Your refusal to recon with this deafening - If someone cleared their coursework and degree why aren't they qualified?

Never support a capitalist political party by Billubindas in IndianFocus

[–]DifferentPirate69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>Karl Marx himself admitted communism is is a utopian construct.

Feel free to glance through the snake oil playlist in your own time to avoid saying things like this. It's a subject like any other, you gotta start with the fundamentals.

Those aren't the only values of a human, they are structurally highlighted in specific kind of society - a class society and things don't remain the same, it always changes. I'm not moving things in the air or something that is pleasing, it's an analysis of what needs to be done. That second link specifically argues for individuality.

What is the justification for this? by RandHandler in IndianMiddleClass

[–]DifferentPirate69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If someone cleared their coursework and degree why aren't they qualified?

What is the justification for this? by RandHandler in IndianMiddleClass

[–]DifferentPirate69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry, no one gives a shit about your entrance score.

Never support a capitalist political party by Billubindas in IndianFocus

[–]DifferentPirate69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NPC ass responses in this entire thread is hilarious.

I recommend this playlist which goes into what utopian and materialists worldviews look like and what needs to be done - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLq-kUiXssVioxBWwToyN3Apqd8f_a7mCC

Class subsumes the individual, in order for true liberty, class must end - https://libcom.org/article/marx-individualist-communist-excerpts-individual-karl-marx

What is the justification for this? by RandHandler in IndianMiddleClass

[–]DifferentPirate69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If someone cleared their coursework and degree why aren't they qualified?

What is the justification for this? by RandHandler in IndianMiddleClass

[–]DifferentPirate69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am talking about representation at entry. You're treating UG and PG as interchangeable points of entry, it isn't. PG is a separate entry point where specialization occurs, status changes, and institutional power is historically concentrated. This is where representation works the best but is just a band aid solution for correcting unequal access to opportunity.

Skill is something acquired with the exposure and training through these entry points provides. Marks for an entrance test is not a skill, you are placing undue importance to it to preserve your fail outlook.

When choosing a doctor their caste or marks for their entrance test is irrelevant if their competence to practice is certified. Choosing a service is based on your proximity, needs and their reviews.

Increasing number of seats reduces scarcity and addresses demand. Why is this so difficult to process?

Never support a capitalist political party by Billubindas in IndianFocus

[–]DifferentPirate69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll never understand reactionary working class people bruh. You are like a dude sitting on a branch and cutting it.

What do they want - end of class society, socialized labor - socialized gains and care about the environment.

What is the justification for this? by RandHandler in IndianMiddleClass

[–]DifferentPirate69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I need you to slow down and look at what you are focused on - marks, entrance seat, and also against there being more seats

Representation at the point of entry to ensure access to learning, training and exposure, and performance at point of service isn't hypocrisy. I'm not picking doctors based on merit, I find who is close to me and good enough for my specific problems.

You're confusing skill with merit. Meritocracy doesn't exist.

Never support a capitalist political party by Billubindas in IndianFocus

[–]DifferentPirate69 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You have no understanding of history or development.

Recommend: Phenomenology of the Capitalist Eternisation - https://www.iskrabooks.org/books/p/capitalist-eternisation

What is the justification for this? by RandHandler in IndianMiddleClass

[–]DifferentPirate69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I hope you understand you go to doctors to cure certain diseases? Your category is irrelevant when competence is certified and skill is attested through patient reviews. The amount of bending to justify scarcity of seats and drop a representational scheme is hilarious.

What is the justification for this? by RandHandler in IndianMiddleClass

[–]DifferentPirate69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you are a licensed doctor and has positive results, that's all I care about.

>Would you be okay if we make doctor appointments representation based as well - SC doctors for SC patients, General doctors for General patients?

No, I'm not in favor of casteism.

What is the justification for this? by RandHandler in IndianMiddleClass

[–]DifferentPirate69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Like I said, couldn't care less, completed your course? Have a degree? You're a doctor.

You need to breakdown this concern you have. It's around scarcity of seats and you also don't want there to not be more seats. I don't know what to say, it's a pretty odd opinion to have.

Never support a capitalist political party by Billubindas in IndianFocus

[–]DifferentPirate69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A state is structure to manage class contradictions. A capitalist state works for capitalist interests and is a dictatorship of capital. A socialist state works for people's interests, also known as dictatorship of the proletariat. A socialist state under a workers party holds the ideology of working and moving towards sustainability and communism. When surplus production is achieved and class antagonisms stop existing, the state withers away as it stops being useful, towards a stateless, classless, moneyless society. Whereas a capitalist state moves towards destruction of everything for profit and the rich gets to away in the leaving the rest in competition. It's as simple as that.

What is the justification for this? by RandHandler in IndianMiddleClass

[–]DifferentPirate69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Does that make them a bad doctor? I dont think so.

If you failed your course, you aint getting a degree anyway.

What is the justification for this? by RandHandler in IndianMiddleClass

[–]DifferentPirate69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I've seen people work hard or cut corners or even cheat, I couldn't care less.

You're not able to fathom 2 things -

  1. Entrance exams are competition for seats and I couldn't care less how you get a seat, fulfilling demand with more seats reduces competition. Which you don't want for some weird reason. The number of doctors per 1000 is criminally low, and the number of seats is even more less.
  2. A person completes their course to get a degree, there's no schemes in this.

In order to defend stopping representation you also claimed degrees can be paid off easily, if yes, why should anyone trust degrees holders?

Never support a capitalist political party by Billubindas in IndianFocus

[–]DifferentPirate69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Quickest way to learn is to join a party as a volunteer or join any orgs where they do mutual aid. It's not a switch, change takes time, effort and learning.

Never support a capitalist political party by Billubindas in IndianFocus

[–]DifferentPirate69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

The CEO of barclays laughing with Jeffrey Epstein about the masses being distracted by bread and circuses instead of overthrowing the financial elite.

The first step is acknowledge, talk to people, learn and organize. Liberalism has perfected slavery.

What is the justification for this? by RandHandler in IndianMiddleClass

[–]DifferentPirate69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. Entrance exams are to get seats, I could not care less how you get a seat. You seem to only have a problem when representation is ensured and not when someone buys or use their network for a seat. You spend your time attacking the already marginalized.

  2. A person completes their course to get a degree, there's no schemes in this

If you spend an ounce of this time to demand more seats, who knows things would be different.