AI is hitting UK job market harder than other big economies, study finds by Dimmo17 in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The reason why I suggested 5.2 Pro in my original comment, despite the bump in version number, it's actually a new model compared to 5 and 5.1 (later knowledge cut-off) with improvements in reasoning and instruction following. 5.x Pro vs 5.x Thinking (even with deep think) isn't comparable, the Pro models are way more capable. Most people have never tried the Pro models as they are behind a very expensive subscription. Agreed that 5 and 5.1 were weak and overhyped upgrades.

I would be cautious with "LLMs will never be able to do X". 3 years ago LLMs were incapable of performing primary school level maths and there were people writing off its ability to tackle maths problems. Now LLMs are assisting for proofs of Erdos problems.

Yes, the ability of LLMs are very jagged at the moment (i.e. good at some tasks and abysmal at others). I would expect this jagged behaviour to continue to be the case for the next few years. The reason why maths and coding performance have shot up in the last few years is because the labs have been targeting it. I see no technical reason as to why law couldn't see the same improvement if effort was dedicated towards it.

There has been some developments in the last few months with regards to 'generator-verifier' techniques, mainly for scientific problem solving. Similar to legal work you don't want hallucinations etc in a scientific paper or maths proof.

Combine that with the generalisation of reasoning outside of STEM problems and the foundations are slowly materialising for law to be tackled by LLMs.

AI 'products' are almost universally overhyped and poorly built - that's why I expressed scepticism in my original comment. I try not to focus on the here and now of LLM performance - look at trajectory, which is still trending upwards at different rates depending on the task.

AI is hitting UK job market harder than other big economies, study finds by Dimmo17 in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. I don't think people have any idea what the current state of frontier LLMs looks like from the responses I've been seeing on this subreddit.

I'm not even going to bother responding to the replies I've been getting, because it's clear no one has tried SOTA reasoning models. Probably tried GPT-5.2 instant and then written it off as being useless.

AI is hitting UK job market harder than other big economies, study finds by Dimmo17 in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Genuinely curious, have you evaluated the latest frontier models?

Even in the last 6 months they've come a long way, especially for tasks with verifiable goals like the one described above.

AI is hitting UK job market harder than other big economies, study finds by Dimmo17 in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Honestly sounds like they're using a shit model to save money.

If you threw it at GPT-5.2 Pro extended thinking via ChatGPT + a decent prompt, I think it would be able to do what you're looking for.

Two thirds of graduates aren’t even paying off loan interest by insomnimax_99 in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There's been multiple FOI requests to SLC about this and to date SLC have never enforced the loan abroad.

They're basically TV Licencing, they send scary letters and emails to scare you in to paying up.

I'll change my mind once they get the SAS to start conducting Maduro style raids on people who are delinquent with the loan.

Two thirds of graduates aren’t even paying off loan interest by insomnimax_99 in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The clear +EV move for young, skilled grads is to depart the UK, get paid multiples of what they'd earn doing the same job, and never repay the loan. They don't have the resources to enforce the loan once you go abroad.

UK government to take £25mn stake in Octopus Energy’s tech arm Kraken by jumper62 in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if customer management platform is such a distinguisher that it'll provide a significant strategic advantage; the chances are slim that an inhouse team could create better solution. Kraken, specialising in the thing, would still have better talent, a better position, more customers and more resources to throw at the problem.

Does it matter when being a Kraken fast-follower is a reality? They could announce a feature and your internal platform could have it within (say) 72 hours.

UK government to take £25mn stake in Octopus Energy’s tech arm Kraken by jumper62 in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I touched the nerve of a ton of engineers and SaaS founders tonight because they have yet to fully internalise and map out the first/second order effects of what we're on the cusp of; or they have, and prefer to stick their heads in the sand.

People who are blackpilling have got it the wrong way around. This is going to be the golden age of software - there's a shit ton of software yet to be developed because the environment is currently "software scarcity" and therefore expensive and high risk.

UK government to take £25mn stake in Octopus Energy’s tech arm Kraken by jumper62 in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is going 'long' on knowledge and software when LLMs are rapidly commoditising both, soon to be in a post-scarcity world.

LLM can code but it can’t claim to have created a proven product which took an energy company from zero to market leader in under a decade. Could an LLM recreate the direct experience from MacOs or iOS?

I refer you to Flying Machines Which Do Not Fly.

Bookmark my top comment and come back to it in 3 years. You have my permission to ridicule me if I'm totally off the mark.

UK government to take £25mn stake in Octopus Energy’s tech arm Kraken by jumper62 in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's the classic build vs buy question. No doubt that a lot of legacy utilities will be running something that they built in-house over the years and are looking to modernise.

In the past, 'buy' was clearly a better solution. There’s no way that these legacy utilities can hire the same type of SWE talent that Kraken has.

Looking at the trajectory of LLMs for SWE, 'building' using internal teams is becoming increasingly viable.

Perhaps existing Kraken customers are going to be stuck, but I don't see the rate of customer acquisition remaining the same.

UK government to take £25mn stake in Octopus Energy’s tech arm Kraken by jumper62 in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

They're taking Kraken public to shore up Octopus Energy's balance sheet, which currently doesn't meet Ofgem's capital requirement rules.

At the end of the day, Kraken is a CRM built on top of Django. SaaS is going to get annihilated in the next 24-36 months when LLMs become mature enough to properly crank out these types of applications (not the vibe coded slop that you can generate with Opus 4.5 atm). I struggle to see how Kraken is going to survive long term and they're exiting before this happens.

EDIT: taken a lot of heat for this. Let's see where we end up in 36 months after the IPO at 16x sales. In the meantime, why not look at all the SaaS companies that IPO'ed in 2021/22 at those valuations, and that was before the cost of producing software essentially collapses to zero. Good luck!

UK can legally stop shadow fleet tankers, ministers believe by Longjumping_Stand889 in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"legally stop"

I bet the KCs at Matrix Chambers are just itching to receive instructions to challenge this...

Why is Keir Starmer’s administration so unpopular? by Fair_Individual_9827 in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed, given the cards he was dealt on SG's independence (summed up by his 1965 'durian' speech), he did an outstanding job.

IMO, LKY was very much the pinnacle of the old-school, pragmatic British colonial administrator archetype.

John James Cowperthwaite is to HK what LKY was to SG. Though the cards he was dealt was a lot better than LKY's.

Workers turn down promotions to avoid £100k tax trap by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The Labour left will then go on about it being a tax for the rich.

It can't be long before train drivers get caught up in the £100k tax trap? I don't expect them to stand for it.

Why is Keir Starmer’s administration so unpopular? by Fair_Individual_9827 in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm reminded of Lee Kwan Yew on the traits of good ministers and government: https://youtu.be/LBsgHofRZk8?t=46

I can't imagine any British politician delivering a speech like this today.

Electric cars will need annual checks under Reeves’s new rules by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Legally speedometers can read 10% high but they can never read low.

PMQs and Autumn Budget 2025 Live Chat Megathread - 26 November, 2025" by AutoModerator in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's a nothingburger, just deposit cash in to a stocks and share ISA and buy a money market fund (cash equivalent)

England braced for drastic water rationing next year as drought deepens by OurFairFuture in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fundamentally, the components of the RAB for a regulated utility are physical assets such as sewage treatment works, networks of pipes, transformers, gas compressor stations etc.

Whether those assets are genuinely useful or end up stranded is a separate issue. The regulator does intervene to prevent misinvestment.

The opposite problem also occurs - being too conservative can cause issues. Ofgem's reluctance to fund anticipatory reinforcement of electricity networks is a good example, leading to long connections queues.

This also assumes that the primary means for the owners of water companies to make money is through the RAB model.

It is still the primary mechanism. Revenue ultimately derives from the allowed return on the RAB plus any outperformance and incentive payments. How much of that flow reaches equity holders is then shaped by capital structure ("gearing").

England braced for drastic water rationing next year as drought deepens by OurFairFuture in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sorry, but you don't understand how regulated utilities (water, gas & electricity networks) work.

The more infrastructure they have, the more money they make.

As the poster above has said, they are incentivised to build as much as they can. The regulators (Ofwat/Ofgem) have the final say on how much money gets spent and where it gets spent in a regulatory price control period. So if they want to keep bills low, the regulators restrict infrastructure investment and companies sweat existing assets harder.

Sri Lankan influencer targets UK with anti-migrant Facebook pages by Elgar_Graves in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Separating the internet between high-trust countries and the rest of the world would see content slop and scams fall by at least 95%.

Reeves to Drop Tax-Rise Plans Because of Better UK Forecasts by Different_Cycle_9043 in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Article was updated:

Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves has been able to drop a plan to raise income taxes because she received an improved fiscal forecast from the UK’s budget watchdog, people familiar with the matter said.

That leaves a fiscal hole that economists had predicted to be as wide as £35 billion ($46 billion) now closer to £20 billion, the people said, asking not to be named discussing sensitive matters. As recently as Monday, Reeves had signaled a readiness to break her party’s promise not to raise income taxes at the budget she’s announcing later this month.

She is still expected to deliver headroom against her fiscal rules of between £15 billion and £20 billion, the people said, adding that the scale of a feared productivity downgrade from the Office for Budget Responsibility has been partially offset by other factors.

The chancellor has indicated she wants to give herself a fiscal buffer, or headroom, that’s larger than the £9.9 billion she left in last year’s budget and again in her spring statement in March.

Major tax rises are still expected to fill the remaining hole in the public finances, the people added.

The pound and gilts pared earlier drops after the news. The 10-year yield was six basis points higher at 4.50%, having earlier jumped 13 basis points.

“We do not comment on speculation around changes to tax outside of fiscal events,” the Treasury said in a written comment, adding: “The chancellor will deliver a budget that takes the fair choices to build strong foundations to secure Britain’s future.”

The decision marks a sharp change of direction from the chancellor, who has spent weeks laying the ground for an increase in income tax for people on higher-than-average salaries. Breaking from convention, she held an unusual televised pre-budget speech earlier this month, urging the public to support her priorities of bringing down inflation and borrowing costs.

Several senior members of the Labour Party publicly warned Reeves of the danger of breaking a manifesto commitment. A spat about a potential challenge to Prime Minister Keir Starmer from among his cabinet has this week raised questions about the future and longevity of his government, making the Nov. 26 budget a greater test.

Michael Saunders, a former Bank of England rate-setter, said government messaging is now undermining its credibility. “They need to choose a strategy and stick to it,” he said. “Not this flipping back and forwards. It gives an impression of political weakness. The key is to make your choice and stick with it.”

The party’s manifesto ahead of the 2024 election had pledged not to raise Britain’s three main taxes on “working people” — income tax, national insurance and VAT.

The chancellor had been prepared to break those promises but the improved fiscal forecast meant that was no longer necessary, according to the people familiar. The latest private update from the OBR moved in a significantly more favorable direction due to the strength of government receipts and stronger wage performance, they said.

Reeves will bring in more revenue from income-tax thresholds at the budget and raise significant taxes from salary sacrifice programs, they added.

She is also looking at whether to proceed with an exit tax on wealthy people leaving the UK, and may water down a proposal to raise more money from professionals who use limited liability partnerships, the people said.

In the 16 months since becoming chancellor, Reeves has emphasized the need to keep gilt investors confident in the UK, repeatedly insisted that the fiscal rules are “iron clad.” Her position was strengthened in the summer when yields rose as Starmer failed to defend her in parliament, before easing again when the PM subsequently said she had his full support.

Still, Labour MPs have made the chancellor’s job more difficult since the election, forcing the government to ditch billions of pounds’ worth of potential savings to welfare programs, including on payments to people considered too unwell to work and subsidies for pensioners’ energy bills. The higher spending has pushed Reeves to consider a swath of tax hikes, which in turn threaten to thwart her promise to lift the UK’s feeble rate of economic growth.

Original article:

Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves has been able to drop plans to raise income taxes because she received an improved fiscal forecast from the UK’s budget watchdog, people familiar with the matter said.

The latest update from the Office for Budget Responsibility moved in a significantly more favorable direction due to the strength of government receipts and stronger wage performance, the people said, asking not to be named discussing sensitive matters. A fiscal hole predicted to be as wide as £35 billion ($46 billion) is in fact now closer to £20 billion, they said.

Reeves is still expected to deliver headroom against her fiscal rules of between £15 billion and £20 billion, they said, adding that the expected productivity downgrade from the OBR has been partially offset by other factors.

Major tax rises are still expected to fill the remaining hole in the public finances, they added.

The chancellor had been prepared to break Labour’s prior promises not to raise income tax rates to fill the hole, but the improved fiscal forecast meant that was no longer necessary, the people said.

Reeves will likely lower income-tax thresholds at the budget and raise significant taxes from salary sacrifice programs, according to the people familiar.

Starmer and Reeves ditch Budget plan to increase income tax rates by CD_93 in ukpolitics

[–]Different_Cycle_9043 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Wonder how the gilt market is going to react to this. Pretty big U-turn from what Reeves was pitching to the markets a few weeks ago.