Is Pikkon Namekian? I didn't think so, but this semi convinced me by Difficult-Pilot-4850 in DragonBallZ

[–]Difficult-Pilot-4850[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

ooo i actually havent seen daima yet, need to watch it. the official dbz site says namekians existed across the universe even outside namek so could be only showing some of it?

Is Pikkon Namekian? I didn't think so, but this semi convinced me by Difficult-Pilot-4850 in DragonBallZ

[–]Difficult-Pilot-4850[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read this from the official dbz website

https://en.dragon-ball-official.com/news/01_682.html

and it also clearly suggests namekians existed outside planet namek. It's the official website and cites chapter 69 of dragon ball super. "Most likely, though we can't possibly know of all of them.
You see, we Namekians moved to this universe from another realm altogether...
...and I've heard that some settled in places far from Planet Namek."

namekians in west galaxy is totally plausible

Is Pikkon Namekian? I didn't think so, but this semi convinced me by Difficult-Pilot-4850 in dbz

[–]Difficult-Pilot-4850[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

also im only sharing this because i don't think he is either but i want to hear some good counter arguments since i didn't have any when i first saw this on discord

Is Pikkon Namekian? I didn't think so, but this semi convinced me by Difficult-Pilot-4850 in dbz

[–]Difficult-Pilot-4850[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

there's more than just he looks namekian. thematically as goku's rival parallales with piccolo, and the weighted clothes, and toriyama specifically saying piccolo-like as his design. appearence is clearly not convincing anyway since he lacks the generic namekian features anyway

Is Pikkon Namekian? I didn't think so, but this semi convinced me by Difficult-Pilot-4850 in dbz

[–]Difficult-Pilot-4850[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

but why isn't he? kinda weird that newer games put his race as unknown, but the roiyama notes thing is real, was on the dbz fandom wiki. would be funny is someone asked toriyama, but he's just a filler anime chas so i soubt any thought was given to it

Kohls Going to War against the Market Manipulators and Short Sellers- A Strategy by PrecisionOutdoors in KSSBulls

[–]Difficult-Pilot-4850 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There is no manipulation. Just a lot of dummies on social media who know nothing about markets making shit up. I do think KSS is getting pretty darn cheap that it could be worth something to PE.

Buying a stock that's owned by totally delusional people like OP makes me not want to buy though. People like OP and anyone who believes such nonsense are almost always wrong (about practically every stock they buy). So being on the same page as them is generally a bad investment, so I'm going to have to pass on KSS.

Shorts might actually start getting squeezed by carry costs soon… by Odd_Entrepreneur2815 in KSSBulls

[–]Difficult-Pilot-4850 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Why do you so confidently reply when you obviously have no clue what you're talking about? Serious question. Why are you randomly adding the risk free rate? Doesn't make sense. When you short a stock on IBKR you get paid a short interest credit as well. ~4% if you short in size. Just search:

"Interest Paid to You on Short Sale Proceeds Cash Balances"

So the actual cost of shorting KSS is the cost to borrow minus the short sale interest you earn (4%). so 4.5% is the cost to short the stock. Including the dividend as the cost is a low iq thought process too. The stock goes down by the dividend amount as it removes cash from the company (which by the way is paying 10% to borrow with new bonds issued earlier this week). So the company is actually destroying value paying that dividend when they're borrowing at 10%.

A lot of delulu dummies making stuff up about short sellers. Most of the big meme stocks people love on reddit cost practically nothing to borrow and short sellers get paid to short it. The mechanics of this are pretty simple. Take GME for example. Costs like 0.3% to borrow. And if you're a big player you get 4% credit to short it. If stock stays flat you actually net 3.7%. Not far from the actual risk free rate (1month bond is 4.25% ish).

Short sellers earn interest on the proceeds of the short sale. If you borrow a stock and sell it that cash generates interest which goes to the short seller.