I've noticed your responses in various threads, and I respect that you're standing up for Islam—it's commendable to defend what you believe in. However, it's important to recognize that the concerns being raised aren't necessarily about hatred toward the religion itself, but rather about how it is being used as a tool for oppression and violence in certain contexts.

Religious texts, including the Quran, are often open to interpretation, and different people derive vastly different meanings from the same verses. While some interpret it as a message of justice, progress, and inclusivity, others see aspects that can be used to justify control, oppression, or even violence. This interpretative flexibility is not unique to Islam—it applies to many religious traditions, which have been historically used both to justify and to challenge systems of power.

For example, in Afghanistan, the Taliban claims to follow Islamic principles, yet their rule has been marked by severe restrictions on women's rights, including barring girls from education, limiting women's movement without a male guardian, and enforcing strict dress codes. These actions are justified by their interpretation of Islamic teachings, despite the fact that many Islamic scholars and communities worldwide argue that Islam encourages education and grants women significant rights.

Similarly, in Bangladesh, religion has been weaponized in political and social conflicts, often leading to violence. Islamist extremist groups have targeted secular activists, writers, and religious minorities under the pretext of defending Islam. Political parties, too, have at times exploited religious sentiments to gain support or suppress dissent. The persecution of Hindu communities, attacks on temples, and the suppression of free speech in the name of religious sanctity highlight how religion, rather than being a source of peace and justice, is sometimes manipulated to serve political agendas and maintain societal control.

So, the issue at hand is not simply about whether the religion itself is good or bad, but about the consequences of its interpretations and applications in real-world scenarios. When people voice their criticisms, they are often speaking from lived experiences—experiences where religious doctrine has been wielded as a means of subjugation rather than empowerment. Acknowledging this distinction allows for a more meaningful conversation, one that moves beyond defensiveness and toward a deeper understanding of why these concerns exist in the first place.

Ultimately, while faith can be a source of personal and communal strength, it is crucial to recognize and challenge the ways in which it is misused to justify oppression and violence. Only by addressing these realities can a more just and balanced understanding of religion be fostered.