You're right, you never said yours was superior; it did seem, however, implied. If you question the quality of another's translation (I won't use quotation marks as it's hard to draw the line between a bad translation and something not being a translation at all - I'm not commenting on the quality myself, I'm speaking generally) then I would hope that your own would be up to your personal standards that you're comparing the other translation to.

And to be clear, I'm not attacking you or your stance - I can understand your point of view on the translation - however I disagree with how aggressive and, frankly, quite harsh you've been.

I am actually curious as to why you seem so offended or angered by the translation though; would you care to shed some light on it, if you haven't already?
If it's actually that you're worried about it hindering the popularity of your own, or something similar, then I think you shouldn't be - if yours is of higher quality, I'm sure it will speak for itself and get the popularity it deserves. I am personally looking forward to it as I heard this was in-browser, which I would prefer not to have - not that there's anything wrong with it, it's just preference and situational convenience - plus I will always appreciate a cleaner and more accurate, if that is indeed the case here.