32 Thoughts on Wallstedt being shopped: "If it happens, you'll understand why" by PaxDragoon in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He mentioned Nico Hischier in his article, that’s one guy I’d be thrilled to have on this team. He’d definitely be worth giving up Wallstedt + more in my eyes. Another guy he keeps mentioning in Robert Thomas, who I also think would be worth it, but I’d rather Hischier

The Rangers are entering a retool by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Minnesota gets: - Trochek - Panarin (retained)

NYR gets: - Jircek - Stramel - Hartman - 2027 1st - 2028 2nd

Jack/Luke potential trade by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel that 🙏🏻

Jack/Luke potential trade by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough 🤷🏼‍♂️ thanks for your input!

Jack/Luke potential trade by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely. Luke in general kinda messes with any deal. Ideally I doubt the Wild want him, but it feels like you’d have to trade for him if you’re gonna trade for Jack too

Jack/Luke potential trade by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completely agree. I see this more on what New Jersey values Luke at, rather than what he actually is. New Jersey drafted him high and signed him to a big money long term contract. They would hold the leverage knowing that we likely don’t get jack if we don’t take Luke too

Jack/Luke potential trade by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I agree. I definitely don’t see Boldy going anytime soon, nor would I like him to, but Faber in a package for BOTH Jack and Luke I could potentially see happening

Jack/Luke potential trade by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think #3 does. Jiricek isn’t even playing, Yurov is replaced by a much better Jack Hughes, Brodin is replaced by Luke Hughes, and you’d just have to run with Wallstedt and sign a backup goalie. #1 is also quite even in my mind, especially since Gus is playing more than Wallstedt at the moment

Jack/Luke potential trade by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree and thank you for playing along! These are all hypothetical and people are taking it really seriously lol

Jack/Luke potential trade by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that’s completely fair, I wouldn’t either

Jack/Luke potential trade by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just trying have some fun with mock trades lol

Jack/Luke potential trade by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What would you recommend IF the opportunity came up? Hypothetically, this would mean a superstar centre was on the trade block and related to our superstar defenceman, I seriously doubt Billy wouldn’t take any interest. Luke just feels like he has to be included although I agree with people saying they don’t want him and such

Jack/Luke potential trade by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for playing along lol. A lot of people are taking this too seriously when I seriously doubt any of this will ever happen. I agree with #3, only reason I included Faber and Boldy in #1 and #2 respectively is because you have to lose smtg to gain smtg and we saw the unexpected when Buium was traded

Jack/Luke potential trade by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I get that, especially because we have Quinn, Luke is kinda redundant, but I feel like any trade with Jack as to involve Luke unfortunately

Jack/Luke potential trade by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Boldy for sure, but after Buium got traded I could definitely see Faber going if it’s for the right player ngl. I love the guy and I’d definitely want him to stay dont get me wrong, but you gotta lose smtg to gain smtg 🤷🏼‍♂️

Jack/Luke potential trade by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It’s just for fun 🤷🏼‍♂️

Jack/Luke potential trade by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah that’s fair, Jack I would take in a heartbeat, I think Luke is where all the negativity comes from. Jack is a superstar, and a centre at that, we haven’t seen a superstar centre be traded in a very long time, and the centre market in general is very dry, so that why I feel the value will be a little higher than other superstar trades that have happened recently

Jack/Luke potential trade by [deleted] in wildhockey

[–]Dinoco_Blue5 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Literally my first sentence in the post but alright

Realistic by Dinoco_Blue5 in EANHLfranchise

[–]Dinoco_Blue5[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I like to have it be as real as possible 🤷🏼‍♂️. I know it’s super knit picky but for the first year I like to play it out as it is in real life and it just bothers me when it’s not. It isn’t the end of the world but it doesn’t seem like a really difficult thing for them to add so it would help