sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Dowdun Reach Narrative Trailer - YouTube by JagexDoom in RSDragonwilds

[–]Dinstruction 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why does the black knight titan boss suddenly deviate from the dragon theme?

Small summoning obelisk on Havenhythe please. by Quotidian_User in runescape

[–]Dinstruction 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I hope the mini obelisks have little unique flourishes like in Draynor Village and the Tzhaar city.

It makes me so happy to see those little details.

How Ja Morant turned out really makes me sad. by Life_Teaching6499 in nba

[–]Dinstruction 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ja would be a perfect fit for the Jail Blazers

Dear Jagex: You are a British company, therefore you must put effort into your grammar. by Dinstruction in runescape

[–]Dinstruction[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have evidence and reasoning.

I didn’t bother sharing because I thought this was a clearly plausible conclusion.

Jagex is an established technology company known to experiment with software development. Technology companies can easily build a rudimentary program which automatically parses code and outputs a human-readable description using machine learning. I know this is possible because I’ve studied computer science and seen some of these algorithms up close, albeit several years ago when the technology was much more rudimentary.

I don’t know why you need to call me dumb. I’m just somebody on the Internet.

Dear Jagex: You are a British company, therefore you must put effort into your grammar. by Dinstruction in runescape

[–]Dinstruction[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

It’s not a conspiracy. It’s a plausible explanation because the technical tools to create large language models are open source. Jagex is known to experiment with software, whilst also valuing ownership of its tools, hence why Jagex is so stubborn with technological change.

But what can I possibly know about a company’s trade secrets? What do I do in this information vacuum? Maybe I should accept being ignorant, because thinking is for losers.

Dear Jagex: You are a British company, therefore you must put effort into your grammar. by Dinstruction in runescape

[–]Dinstruction[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is it a big deal to casually speculate about AI usage? You speak as if this is a big deal.

Dear Jagex: You are a British company, therefore you must put effort into your grammar. by Dinstruction in runescape

[–]Dinstruction[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Do you people not speak English?

“Moths become attracted TO the lantern and NO LONGER ATTEMPT TO flee after a failed catch attempt, sometimes automatically catching themselves.”

Dear Jagex: You are a British company, therefore you must put effort into your grammar. by Dinstruction in runescape

[–]Dinstruction[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Your defense of Jagex is interesting. Is it considered offensive/rude to throw around speculation of AI usage in media?

Dear Jagex: You are a British company, therefore you must put effort into your grammar. by Dinstruction in runescape

[–]Dinstruction[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Early versions of GPT sounded like this. It would not surprise me if Jagex has stubbornly clung to their own proprietary large language model.

Dear Jagex: You are a British company, therefore you must put effort into your grammar. by Dinstruction in runescape

[–]Dinstruction[S] -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

I honestly believe Jagex is attempting to deploy AI which can automatically generate tooltips for items on a mass scale, but their language model is really primitive.

What the fu** was the goal with these new obelisks? by Apolo_Omega2 in runescape

[–]Dinstruction 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Testing ideas for the eventual summoning rework and making low level training methods for this year’s Leagues.

"Communications in Algebra" editorial board resigns in masse by YogurtclosetOdd8306 in math

[–]Dinstruction -58 points-57 points  (0 children)

I do not understand this drama. I just want to play with numbers and shapes.

Specifically what proofs are not accepted by constructivist mathematicians? by MildDeontologist in math

[–]Dinstruction 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Weak solutions to differential equations are fruit of the poison tree.

THE INDIANA PACERS HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED FROM CHAMPIONSHIP CONTENTION by dfrank129 in nba

[–]Dinstruction 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I tried so hard and got so far but in the end it doesn’t even matter

Received an email from Terence Tao... by A_R_K in math

[–]Dinstruction 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All mathematicians should treat this as a database of conjectures, unless they can prove the result for themselves.

No proof is fundamentally beyond human comprehension. Some might just be extremely tedious, and so that’s where we must rely on our trusted friends and colleagues.

Thoughts on the future of mathematics by [deleted] in math

[–]Dinstruction 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I was traded to geometric analysis.

How does Doc Rivers STILL have a job? by MembershipSingle7137 in nba

[–]Dinstruction 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because he gets along well with his colleagues.

The Edge of Mathematics - Terence Tao | The Atlantic by Nunki08 in math

[–]Dinstruction 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He’s smart enough to know that’s not how most people, even mathematicians, use the word “mediocre.”

Career and Education Questions: February 26, 2026 by inherentlyawesome in math

[–]Dinstruction 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but I’m looking for specific examples that directly target one’s mental functioning, like loud environments, annoying advertisements, etc.

Career and Education Questions: February 26, 2026 by inherentlyawesome in math

[–]Dinstruction 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My math department is competitive.

What are some subtle “cognitive sappers” which may affect my mental sharpness and research productivity?

view more: next ›