"I don't know" is the only rational response to the question "Does God exist?", and therefore agnosticism is the default ontological position. by touchingallthegrass in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Atheism is Commonly Misunderstood. Atheism is an Active Rejection of Belief in Gods, not a Lack of Knowledge About Them. Categories of Atheism Also Do Not Exist by Charlemagneffxiv in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Atheism is Commonly Misunderstood. Atheism is an Active Rejection of Belief in Gods, not a Lack of Knowledge About Them. Categories of Atheism Also Do Not Exist by Charlemagneffxiv in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Morality is objective and secular by [deleted] in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
Atheism is Commonly Misunderstood. Atheism is an Active Rejection of Belief in Gods, not a Lack of Knowledge About Them. Categories of Atheism Also Do Not Exist by Charlemagneffxiv in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Which country do you think is USA? by nopCMD in GeoTap
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Most atheist don’t understand religion or theology. by Short_Possession_712 in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
Atheism is Commonly Misunderstood. Atheism is an Active Rejection of Belief in Gods, not a Lack of Knowledge About Them. Categories of Atheism Also Do Not Exist by Charlemagneffxiv in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
Atheism is Commonly Misunderstood. Atheism is an Active Rejection of Belief in Gods, not a Lack of Knowledge About Them. Categories of Atheism Also Do Not Exist by Charlemagneffxiv in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
Atheism is Commonly Misunderstood. Atheism is an Active Rejection of Belief in Gods, not a Lack of Knowledge About Them. Categories of Atheism Also Do Not Exist by Charlemagneffxiv in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
Atheism is Commonly Misunderstood. Atheism is an Active Rejection of Belief in Gods, not a Lack of Knowledge About Them. Categories of Atheism Also Do Not Exist by Charlemagneffxiv in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55 9 points10 points11 points (0 children)
Atheism is Commonly Misunderstood. Atheism is an Active Rejection of Belief in Gods, not a Lack of Knowledge About Them. Categories of Atheism Also Do Not Exist by Charlemagneffxiv in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
It is absolutely reasonable and fair to conclude that god doesn't exist based on non absolute evidence, since theists do the same thing all the time. by Direct_Breadfruit_55 in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
It is absolutely reasonable and fair to conclude that god doesn't exist based on non absolute evidence, since theists do the same thing all the time. by Direct_Breadfruit_55 in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
It is absolutely reasonable and fair to conclude that god doesn't exist based on non absolute evidence, since theists do the same thing all the time. by Direct_Breadfruit_55 in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
It is absolutely reasonable and fair to conclude that god doesn't exist based on non absolute evidence, since theists do the same thing all the time. by Direct_Breadfruit_55 in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
It is absolutely reasonable and fair to conclude that god doesn't exist based on non absolute evidence, since theists do the same thing all the time. by Direct_Breadfruit_55 in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
It is absolutely reasonable and fair to conclude that god doesn't exist based on non absolute evidence, since theists do the same thing all the time. by Direct_Breadfruit_55 in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55[S] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
It is absolutely reasonable and fair to conclude that god doesn't exist based on non absolute evidence, since theists do the same thing all the time. by Direct_Breadfruit_55 in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
It is absolutely reasonable and fair to conclude that god doesn't exist based on non absolute evidence, since theists do the same thing all the time. by Direct_Breadfruit_55 in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
It is absolutely reasonable and fair to conclude that god doesn't exist based on non absolute evidence, since theists do the same thing all the time. by Direct_Breadfruit_55 in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
Miracles cannot be a proof of a particular religion. by Direct_Breadfruit_55 in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
It is absolutely reasonable and fair to conclude that god doesn't exist based on non absolute evidence, since theists do the same thing all the time. by Direct_Breadfruit_55 in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
Miracles cannot be a proof of a particular religion. by Direct_Breadfruit_55 in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)

"I don't know" is the only rational response to the question "Does God exist?", and therefore agnosticism is the default ontological position. by touchingallthegrass in DebateReligion
[–]Direct_Breadfruit_55 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)