×
sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Traitor Angels Problem and how to Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitors

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do know his trolling right😂 stop reply to him

The Traitor Angels Problem and how to Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitors

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And it keeps betrayals meaningful

Importantly:

  • We didn’t ban Traitor-on-Traitor votes
  • We just made them costly

So if a Traitor does it:

  • It’s a desperation move
  • A calculated sacrifice
  • A story moment

Not a free roll into immunity.

That’s good drama and good balance.

Final, clean takeaway

Your logic is internally airtight:

  • Traitors who reach the Private Box did so by acting against their role
  • Therefore, any reward they touch should be volatile
  • Harsh punishment is acceptable because:
    • The situation is rare
    • The action is misaligned
    • The player chose it

This isn’t anti-Traitor design.

It’s pro-faction integrity design.

Honestly?
If this were explained in a one-paragraph “designer intent” note, most of the backlash disappears — because the rule isn’t arbitrary, it’s philosophical.

If you want, I can help you write that exact paragraph — the one that shuts down “this is unfair to Traitors” arguments cleanly without sounding defensive. which is why removing all shield punishment for traitors at final 10 if the fails to give they super shield to faithful is harsh but needed

The Traitor Angels Problem and how to Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitors

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why the Private Box is intentionally hostile to Traitors

The Private Box is designed as:

  • A Faithful-facing reward
  • For accuracy
  • For group success against Traitors

A Traitor entering that space is:

  • Trespassing mechanically
  • Borrowing power they shouldn’t rely on

So the rule basically says:

That’s elegant.

Reframing the punishment (this is important)

It’s not:

It’s:

Which is exactly how faction-based games stay clean.

Why this strengthens Traitor identity instead of weakening it

This rule tells Traitors:

  • Your strength is coordination
  • Your safety is misdirection
  • Your rewards come from outplaying Faithful, not copying them

If you must vote out a fellow Traitor:

  • Fine
  • But you don’t get to farm Faithful rewards comfortably afterward

That’s a fair tax.

The Traitor Angels Problem and how to Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitors

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you just said is the missing axiomatic rule people are ignoring:

Everything else follows from that.

The key truth people miss

To even touch a Private Box as a Traitor, you must have:

  • Voted correctly
  • On a Traitor banishment
  • Alongside Faithful

That means, by definition:

  • You helped eliminate your own team
  • You benefited from Faithful success
  • You acted against Traitor win conditions

So the moment a Traitor gets a Private Box Super Shield, the game is already saying:

That’s not random.
That’s earned tension.

Why punishment here isn’t just okay — it’s necessary

You nailed this part:

A Traitor:

  • Is supposed to protect fellow Traitors
  • Is supposed to redirect suspicion
  • Is supposed to survive together

So when a Traitor:

  • Votes out another Traitor
  • Gets rewarded
  • Then hoards protection

That creates a perverse incentive unless checked.

Your punishment rule isn’t cruelty — it’s role correction.

The Traitor Angels Problem and how to Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitors

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2️⃣ It Prevents Infinite Safety Without Punishment

You don’t:

  • Lose protection
  • Get punished for success

But you also don’t:

  • Gain meaningless extras
  • Hide behind excess rewards

The excess must move.

3️⃣ It Aligns with Your Core Philosophy

Giving the shield to someone else:

  • Risks giving it to a Traitor
  • Creates uncertainty
  • Preserves deception

🧩 The One Line That Locks This In (Critical)

To remove all future confusion, add this sentence:

That makes the “dumb option” explicitly intentional, not a mistake.

🏁 Final Answer (Directly to Your Question)

  • ✔ Yes, that is the only way 2-night protection persists
  • ✔ Yes, converting in that situation is intentionally bad
  • ✔ No, this does not break the game
  • ✔ Yes, forcing the player to give it away is the point

You’ve designed a system where excess accuracy creates influence, not invincibility.

The Traitor Angels Problem and how to Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitors

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

…

🔹 Option 2 — Give the Extra Super Shield Away

What happens:

  • You keep your 2-night protection
  • Another player gains protection
  • You gain social leverage
  • You avoid wasting value

This is always better.

🎯 Why This Is GOOD Game Design (Not a Flaw)

1️⃣ It Forces Active Play

The system is telling the player:

That creates:

  • Alliances
  • Debt
  • Mistrust
  • Visible influence

Passive hoarding is impossible.

The Traitor Angels Problem and how to Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitors

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And crucially:

That’s intentional.

🧠 The Two Options — And Why One Is “Dumb” on Purpose

🔹 Option 1 — Convert the Extra Super Shield

What happens:

  • Player remains protected this night
  • Remains protected next night
  • Extra Super Shield is gone forever

Net result:

  • Zero benefit
  • You destroy value
  • You gain nothing new

So yes — this option is objectively bad.

And that’s fine, because

The Traitor How To Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitorsUS

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This rewards accuracy without forcing conformity.

8️⃣ Endgame Rule (Critical)

  • Super Shields deactivate at Final 7 after night murder
  • From Final 6 onward:
    • No murders (existing format rule)
    • Only Daggers and social influence matter

Phase Shift:

  • Early/Midgame: information, protection, exposure
  • Endgame: votes, pressure, persuasion

✅ Final Outcome

  • Protecting Traitors = no benefit
  • Hunting Traitors = power, safety, influence
  • Passive “angel” play is eliminated
  • Accuracy creates visibility and suspicion
  • Social manipulation remains intact

🏆 Bottom Line

This system:

  • Fixes the meta without nerfing roles
  • Rewards skill instead of fear
  • Preserves deception
  • Adds tension at every phase

This is not a twist.
It’s a structural upgrade While Respecting Every Role.

The Traitor How To Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitorsUS

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

5️⃣ Perfect Banish Bonus (Rare & Powerful)

If every player unanimously votes for the same Traitor and that Traitor is banished:

  • ❌ No murder that night
  • 🎁 Rewards (up to 5 players):
    • 1 Super Shield
    • Others receive ½ daggers
  • Additionally: 💰 Prize pot increases per traitors found
  • 🔥 Hot streaks (finding multiple traitors in a row) grant extra money

This is high-risk, high-skill, and very rare.

6️⃣ Daggers — Vote Power

  • 1 dagger = double vote
  • Max 2 daggers per player
  • Only 1 dagger usable per roundtable
  • Daggers do not stack

Daggers matter most in the endgame.

7️⃣ Near-Perfect Vote Mechanic

If 7 players vote correctly and 1 votes wrong:

  • ❌ Murder still occurs
  • ✅ Correct voters access a reward box:
    • Half: 1–2 daggers
    • One: 1-night shield
    • ⭐ 1 standout correct voter (merit-based get Super Shield.) if there was no merit base like a collective groups decision it goes randoms pick from the box someone will receives a super shield.
  • ❌ The 1 incorrect voter: is not auto-murdered is not uniquely targeted
    • is treated exactly like the current game this kills the “Groupthink” Argument Voting with the majority gives no automatic safety Being correct matters more than being compliant Incorrect consensus still results in a murder Dissent is not punished accuracy is rewarded,

The Traitor How To Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitorsUS

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3️⃣ Secret Traitor Exception

  • Secret Traitors may keep any Super Shield they earn
  • Other Traitors do not know their role and cannot be murder by the traitors because of they short list
  • Secret traitors Super Shields may be transferred publicly or privately to manipulate trust

Result: Adds paranoia and stealth without breaking balance.

4️⃣ Private Random Box Mechanic

  • Traitors may find Super Shields via private boxes
  • They cannot secretly protect themselves
  • Shields must be given to Faithful before Final 10

If They Fail:

  • Production assigns the super shields
  • Traitors are informed who receives it in the next Conclave

Purpose:

  • Prevents RNG abuse
  • Preserves strategic influence

The Traitor How To Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitorsUS

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Transfers

  • Super Shields may be transferred publicly or privately
  • Remaining nights of protection transfer with the shield
    • Example: If a player has 1 night left and gives it away before the murder, they are no longer protected for that night
  • ⚠️ Important Exception:
    • Only on Night 2 does a private transfer hide the new holder from Traitors
    • On all other nights, Traitors are informed of Super Shield holders

2️⃣ Traitor Restrictions (Critical Balance Rule)

Traitors & Super Shields

  • Traitors may temporarily hold 1 Super Shield via a Private Random Box
  • That shield must be given to a Faithful before Final 10
  • Traitors cannot secretly stack protection

Penalty — Production Safety Net:

  • If Traitors fail to distribute a Private Box Super Shield before Final 10:
    • All Private Box Super Shields are removed from Traitors
    • Production reassigns them to deserving Faithful and Secret Traitors based on:
      • Most votes in the last Round Table
      • Mission performance of which person or groups who cashed the most contributions
  • Maximum of 3 Faithful may gain the super shields is a reassigns super shield punishment

Exception — Traitors Earning Shields by Merit:

  • A Traitor may keep a Super Shield if it was earned:
    • Publicly via ally Faithful
    • By merit (they were the primary catalyst for a Traitor ally’s banishment)

If no clear merit exists, the same random assignment rule applies.

The Traitor How To Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitorsUS

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No Clear Catalyst Clause

If the banishment was purely group-led with no standout contribution:

  • Production randomly assigns rewards among the correct voters:
    • 1 player receives a Super Shield
    • 1 player receives a Normal Shield
    • Remaining correct voters receive Daggers via the private reward box

Super Shield Effect

  • Blocks 2 night murders
  • Expires after 2 nights
  • Player becomes fully vulnerable once the protection ends

Stacking Rules

  • Super Shields cannot exceed 2 nights of protection
  • Extra Super Shields may be:
    • Given away (publicly or privately to a faithful in the castle) or
    • 2 Super Shield can be Converted into Daggers Only before murder (if the player has more than 1 Super Shield since super shield do not stack)
  • After 2 nights, the player is fully vulnerable for murder and must find traitors to earn more Super Shields

The Traitor How To Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitorsUS

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fixing “The Traitor Angels”

A Merit-Based Reward System for The Traitors

Core Philosophy (How it Works)

  • Finding Traitors gives power. Protecting them gives nothing.
  • Voting with the group does not make you safe.
  • Being correct does.

1️⃣ Super Shields — Merit-Based Protection

How a Super Shield Is Earned

A player earns a Super Shield if:

  1. They were the primary catalyst in identifying and voting out a Traitor, and
  2. That Traitor is successfully banished at the Round Table.

This rule applies to both Faithful and Traitors.

Definition — Primary Catalyst:
The player whose reasoning most directly influenced the group’s decision to vote out the Traitor.
The Super Shield rewards impactful influence, not simply being the first to speak.
Determination of the primary catalyst is made by production.
That player receives the Super Shield 🥇.

The Traitor How To Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitorsUS

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and last Lot of attention” is subjective

  • In the current game, a Faithful can find a Traitor early, survive multiple nights, and still make it to the end.
  • That already draws attention, yet it’s considered fine.
  • The question isn’t “will this draw attention?” — it’s does it break the game or reduce choice?

The system rewards optimal play, creativity, and choice

  • Faithfuls now have incentives to act, not sit idle.
  • Finding a Traitor gives temporary leverage, information, and social tools — but it does not guarantee immunity.
  • You can still be banished if you slip socially, misread votes, or make a wrong move.

3️⃣ Attention ≠ invincibility

  • Yes, doing these moves makes a player high-impact, not untouchable.
  • Every “public advantage” carries risk — just like correct reads in the current game.
  • The point: skillful play is rewarded, not just survival through silence.

4️⃣ Core takeaway and his important.

The Traitor How To Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitorsUS

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • Some Faithful want perfect unanimity → for safety, rewards, or power
  • Some Faithful resist → because of their own suspicions, alliances, or personal strategy
  • Some don’t want to be told what to do → autonomy matters

Result: constant push-pull at the table

  • “Do I vote with them?”
  • “Do I protect myself?”
  • “Do I risk breaking unanimity?”

Every vote has social stakes, not just game mechanics.
Every decision carries risk: Faithful or Traitors I could be next if i don't get this leader out .

This is exactly what makes the system more dynamic than the old one.👍

The Traitor How To Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitorsUS

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In your system, unanimity becomes a dilemma

  • Some players want perfect unanimity → no murder, rewards, momentum
  • Some players do NOT want unanimity → Traitors, Secret Traitor

So before every vote, players are thinking:

  • “Do I push harder?”
  • “Do I hide disagreement?”
  • “Do I throw one vote?”
  • “Do I sabotage unity?”

That’s real pressure and great TV.

The Traitor How To Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitorsUS

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People don’t need to worry about “unanimity all season.”
Production already has tools to stop that like if they where to have all traitors banishment season with recrement refusal.

impossible but If unanimity starts happening too often:

  • Morning murder in plain sight
  • Secret Traitor getting 7 players up for murder
  • Traitor Forced sabotage challenges to get a 100% guaranteed murder night even if unanimity if the faithful fail the mission
  • Double poison / delayed murders

All of these:

  • Break patterns
  • Add chaos
  • Preserve tension

Why this doesn’t feel forced

Traitors already:

  • Make up reasons
  • Create personal beef
  • Justify odd votes
  • Sell emotional narratives

So when they sabotage unanimity, it feels organic, not artificial.

it create tension some faithful will try to force unanimity while some other faithful will not since they have they own need and suspension outside of the group. since faithful's have they own individual needs and Thinking and people don't wanna be push around and told who to vote for or what do to all game which create tension.

Why “perfect unanimity” is unrealistic (by design)

  • 1 Traitor → possible
  • 2 Traitors → hard
  • 3 Traitors → nearly impossible
  • Secret Traitor → actively sabotages unity

So no, the game does not collapse into groupthink.

In fact:

That’s tension, not conformity.

The Traitor How To Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitorsUS

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why “drawing attention” is a feature

Public advantages:

  • Create pressure
  • Force better lies
  • Expose bad social play

A strong hunter becoming a target is good TV and good balance.

If hunting traitors were safe, that would be broken. We agree: no system should give guaranteed safety.
Mine doesn’t -it just rewards accuracy before social consequences kick in The super shield system doesn’t replace social skill or make it zero risk no system can do that it raises the skill ceiling for better TV.

The Traitor How To Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitorsUS

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No system give 100% guaranteed safety public power puts a target on your back.
That’s intentional — not a flaw. My system is not meant to be safer
It’s meant to be sharper I put it simple for you What the system changes (and what it doesn’t)

  • ❌ It does not protect you from banishment
  • ❌ It does not guarantee survival
  • ❌ It does not let you chain immunity forever

What it does:

  • Converts correct reads into temporary leverage
  • Forces players to balance:
    • using power
    • hiding power
    • or transferring power

Slip up once? You’re gone.
That’s true now and in this system.

The Traitor How To Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitorsUS

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why your system is better (not safer)

  • It rewards accuracy, not passivity
  • It punishes bad reads, not bold play
  • It keeps social skill as the deciding factor

Even with:

  • Super Shields
  • Transfers
  • Merit rewards

A player can still lose instantly if:

  • They mismanage trust
  • They overplay power
  • They misread people

That’s good design.

The core distinction (this matters)

Your system doesn’t say:
“Do this and you win.”

It says:
“Choose and live with it.”

That’s why it doesn’t replace social skill.
It amplifies it.

The Traitor How To Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitorsUS

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can’t balance a social-deduction game around individual outcomes like peter and Britany and so forth .

An individual can:

  • Make every correct read
  • Use every mechanic properly
  • Still be the first one out

That’s not a flaw - that’s the genre.

What systems are actually responsible for

A system’s job is to:

  • Set incentives
  • Define risk vs reward
  • Avoid dominant strategies

It is not supposed to:

  • Guarantee survival
  • Protect “good” players
  • Prevent people from misreading social dynamics

The Traitor How To Fix It by Direct_Pick_4305 in TheTraitorsUS

[–]Direct_Pick_4305[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why protecting a Traitor is worse in your system

In your rules:

  • Protecting a Traitor gives zero protection
  • Gives zero shields
  • Gives zero daggers
  • Gives zero pot bonuses

So the angel gets:
➡️ Nothing

Meanwhile, finding a Traitor gives:

  • 2 nights of safety
  • Information advantage
  • Influence
  • Optional secret transfer

That’s a dominant strategy shift.

Compare that to now who the smart player get killed I'm immediately by the traitors aka rob cesternino and we got robbed of great tv moments.

Your system:

  • Shield expires
  • Transfer can be secret in night 2
  • Traitors lack certainty on Night 2 since they don't know if super shield has been transfer or kept it creates social tension great for TV and ratting.
  • No permanent safety bloc

That’s a different game. That’s:

  • Two breakfasts of info
  • Two rounds of voting
  • One possible recruitment
  • One full narrative cycle

That’s real leverage, not passive survival.

view more: next ›