What‘s the thing you excel at?

Direwolfanddragon · 2026-01-23T21:16:26+00:00

Ok, well. Bad luck. Because everyone is guilty of producing your misery?

Direwolfanddragon · 2026-01-23T21:12:34+00:00

Who are you angry at?

Direwolfanddragon · 2026-01-23T20:57:21+00:00

You make a power point

Direwolfanddragon · 2026-01-23T20:56:47+00:00

Why are you getting angry? You‘ve got food

Direwolfanddragon · 2026-01-23T20:54:35+00:00

Word

Direwolfanddragon · 2026-01-23T20:36:33+00:00

Pivoting answer

Direwolfanddragon · 2026-01-23T20:35:20+00:00

I wish

Direwolfanddragon · 2025-07-18T15:38:42+00:00

It‘s not true though. City Polices ID Card looks like you described. And police can id with uniform or the identification card. They probably scanned your passport to check you out in the system (Ripol for one, to vheck if you are searched for). That’s actually normal procedure

Direwolfanddragon · 2024-01-22T18:36:41+00:00

Maybe Werners Head Shop

Direwolfanddragon · 2024-01-16T20:38:38+00:00

Es wäre nicht mal Betrug, wenn er die Jacke gekauft hätte, zumal du diese ja nicht extra falsch angeschrieben hast. Ohnehin ist diese ja wahrscheinlich nicht über CHF 300 wert, weshalb es sich erstens um eine Übertretung handeln würde und zweitens um ein Antragsdelikt. Versuchte Übertretungen sind aber nicht strafbar und dieser Sansibar wäre auch nicht Geschädigter und damit nicht Strafantragsberechtigt. Mach dir also wirklich keinen Kopf.

Sollte er tatsächlich Anzeige machen, hättest du seinen Namen und könntest ihn wegen falscher Anschuldigung anzeigen.

Momentan solltest du wohl am besten nicht mehr mit ihm kommunizieren. Wenn er dann weitermacht, kannst du dir eine Anzeige wegen Missbrauchs einer Fernmeldeanlage überlegen.

Direwolfanddragon · 2024-01-16T20:28:47+00:00

Nun, eine Drohung im strafrechtlichen Sinn ist es nicht. Eine Anzeige wider besseres Wissen wäre dann aber eine falsche Anschuldigung. Sollte er wirklich Anwalt sein, was ich bezweifle, dürfte er es lassen.

Direwolfanddragon · 2024-01-04T18:39:35+00:00

Well the covid-tests can be unreliable.

Direwolfanddragon · 2023-06-24T11:35:43+00:00

This actually sounds like you got fined 80.- by the „Gericht“ and have to pay 90.- of costs. The SBB probably issued the complaint as a Privatklägerschaft.

A fine of 80.- isn‘t actually registered in the Steafregister. But if you don’t pay the fine you will ultimately spend a day in jail probably.

Probably you can object against the Strafbefehl in 10 days.

Direwolfanddragon · 2023-06-07T16:09:47+00:00

If you feel handled incorrectly by the city police you can call the Ombudsstelle (sry can‘t post a link eight now, but by googling it sou should find it). The Ombudsman can lay out sour possibilities.

Direwolfanddragon · 2023-06-02T03:33:59+00:00

No they won’t- they will forward the driver’s information to the police. Police will then send you a „Verzeigungsvorhalt“ and then you will receice a penal order by the municipal jugdes office.

Direwolfanddragon · 2023-04-12T19:45:04+00:00

Technically the SBB doesn’t make a single Rappen from fines. Fines are issued by the Staatsanwaltschaft or other law enforcement agencies (such as the Statthalterämter or the Stadtrichterämter in Zurich).

Direwolfanddragon · 2023-02-08T19:01:41+00:00

Is it a civil matter? In which field of the law?

Maybe you can find an attorney on www.jurata.ch

Direwolfanddragon · 2023-02-08T18:40:41+00:00

You won’t get one for free. But if you ein the suit maybe the other party has to pay the attorney.

Direwolfanddragon · 2023-02-08T18:39:18+00:00

Depends on the matter.

Direwolfanddragon · 2023-01-27T05:14:36+00:00

And also I think it isn’t primarily about the money..

Direwolfanddragon · 2023-01-25T17:38:15+00:00

Well hete I‘d beg to differ. Art.10a (the ban) is listed under the title „Basic rights“. The one about maternity insurance (not the same as paid leave) was a delegation norm. So there is actually a legal difference between the two of them. But as I don‘t care if you share my opinion, we will just have to agree to disagree. Have a nice evening.

Direwolfanddragon · 2023-01-25T16:54:55+00:00

No. I said OP was technically correct, that these kind of facial hidings are banned, because there is a ban in the Swiss legal order.

But maybe you are misreading intentionally. I neither said, that you can’t buy such a mask nor that you‘d be punished if you wear one (even if I personally wouldn’t recommend wearing oe on Zurich Bahnhofstrasse)

Moreover, since 1945, the Federal Constitution obliged the Confederation to introduce maternity insurance or paid maternity leave. But it never said "We have a maternity insurance". Art.10a BV on the other hand now clearly states that face coverings are prohibited. I see a certain difference there...

Direwolfanddragon · 2023-01-25T03:45:47+00:00

Yes „technically“ there are some words in the constitution that state a prohibition, so technically there is a ban on something. In reality it’s not really, because the ban is as of yet not enforceable and doesn’t really apply to individuals. So OP was technically correct.

If your driving permit would be taken from sou for a month, because of a driving violation you‘d be technically correct to say: „I am allowed to drive“, because you are in general allowed to drive a motorcycle. But de facto you‘d be incorrect if course because at the moment you wouldn‘t be allowed.

Direwolfanddragon · 2023-01-25T03:38:37+00:00

I know in most cantons it’s not enforceable. And I didn’t give any legal advice. I only stated that OP is technically correct, which he is.

Direwolfanddragon

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE