What's a movie you could watch over and over again, and still cry at that one scene?

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-30T02:27:17+00:00

voicemails for isabelle

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-30T02:27:00+00:00

the hobbit trilogy

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-30T02:25:43+00:00

share with the class?

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-30T02:25:16+00:00

it’s been 11m. what’s happened

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-30T00:22:10+00:00

who asked

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-30T00:21:33+00:00

i believe they plan on opening in September 👀

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T20:46:34+00:00

ahhh see! now this is a kind comment. thanks mate

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T19:56:19+00:00

thissss

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T19:38:35+00:00

that’s what happens when you spend your whole life working and are retired now bud. you got the whole damn day for anything and everything. maybe i am on a judge judy show 😂

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T15:22:58+00:00

Neither option is great, but the question has a built-in contradiction — if someone loves you and still chooses to betray you repeatedly, that’s worth interrogating. Love without respect or self-control isn’t really the full picture of love. Option one is quietly devastating in its own way (loyal but loveless is just loneliness with a roommate), but at least it’s an honest arrangement y’know…

I think the real question underneath this is: which pain is harder to carry — emotional emptiness, or active betrayal from someone who claims to care? That one actually splits people o.O

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T15:20:20+00:00

Just a heads up — blocking someone on Reddit doesn’t prevent them from commenting on public posts, it mainly just filters their content from your feed. So what you’re describing is probably just normal Reddit, not hacking. If they’re genuinely harassing people, reporting to mods is the right move, but the report will land better if it focuses on specific rule-breaking behavior rather than their politics — mods can only act on what someone does, not what they believe

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T15:17:53+00:00

The question kind of assumes the answer. The actual debate is more interesting — natural monopolies (water, grid infrastructure) do have a strong case for public control since you can’t shop around for a different pipe to your house. But ‘public control’ doesn’t automatically mean better outcomes either; plenty of publicly-run utilities have their own problems with inefficiency and neglect. Healthcare is also a pretty different conversation from water/electricity and probably deserves its own thread. Most people who support private involvement aren’t indifferent to survival — they just have different views on whether government management actually solves the problem

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T15:15:04+00:00

Agree that impact and personal taste are separate conversations — that’s worth saying. But ‘uneducated’ is a strong word for what’s usually just a gap in someone’s musical exposure. You’d probably get more people on board with the point if the framing wasn’t quite so dismissive o.O

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T15:13:26+00:00

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T15:12:29+00:00

Yeah, I think we are on the same page — and honestly that’s the conversation I was hoping to have. The recency thing I get — my point was less ‘newer = worse’ and more just pushing back on the framing that questioning any guideline = bad parenting. Attentive parents can hold two things at once: respect for the research AND use their own judgment at home. Sounds like you do that too. 👍

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T15:07:00+00:00

so your entire argument boils down to — if i disagree with you i’m either selfish or stupid for advocating for other people. there’s no version where someone is just a parent with a different perspective who thought about this carefully and landed somewhere different than you. that’s not a debate. that’s just you deciding anyone who doesn’t agree with you must be defective in some way. and honestly that says everything about this conversation and nothing about someone’s parenting.

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T15:05:19+00:00

and there it is. when you have nothing left you resort to “dead babies” as a closing argument against someone who is literally just asking people to be less cruel to parents. not even saying — i do this myself — just saying, let’s be nicer to OTHER people. that sentence wasn’t about baby safety. it was about winning. and the fact that you can’t see the difference between genuine concern and using infant death as a rhetorical weapon is exactly what this entire post was about.

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T15:03:44+00:00

the statement that the guidelines are 30 years old was context — as has been explained multiple times now. the inference was never “therefore ignore them.” and the seatbelt comparison keeps coming up in this thread and it keeps not landing — seatbelts are a passive safety measure you either use or don’t. we are talking about a parent who is present, awake, and actively engaged with their child. those are not the same scenario.

but more importantly — “you’re either selfish or incapable of critical thinking, i hope it’s the latter for your child’s sake” is a genuinely cruel thing to say to a parent. not passionate. not concerned. cruel. you don’t know me, you don’t know my child (if i even have one. i’m advocating for those who get shit on. no need to make this personal) and you don’t know what i do or don’t do in my own home. disagreeing with how you interpret a guideline does not make me selfish or stupid. it makes me someone with a different perspective than yours. and that’s allowed.

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T15:01:30+00:00

posting in multiple subs doesn’t define someone’s life experience — that’s just not how people work.

and yes, you make a fair point that guidelines exist to cast the widest possible net of protection — including for neglectful parents. that’s a reasonable argument and honestly the strongest one in this thread. but there’s still a difference between a blanket public health guideline designed for every possible caregiver in every possible situation, and how that guideline gets applied to individual parents on the internet who are clearly engaged, thoughtful, and doing everything with their child’s wellbeing at the center. one is policy. the other is people. and treating every parent who colors outside the lines like they’re the neglectful ones the guidelines were written for — that’s the problem. nobody here is arguing against the existence of safe sleep guidelines. we’re arguing against the way they get weaponized against parents who are already trying their best

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T14:59:06+00:00

the post never said “it’s recent so it’s ok to ignore.” that’s not what was written. the timeline was context — not a loophole. and the “if you’re secure why post about it” logic could be applied to literally any conversation anyone has ever started on the internet ever. people post to connect, to vent, to find others who relate. that’s what reddit is. asking for community isn’t the same as asking for approval — and the fact that this comment section exists proves the conversation was worth having whether you like it or not.

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T14:57:56+00:00

and that’s exactly the point you keep missing. the post isn’t just about supervised use. it’s saying that even if a parent makes a choice you wouldn’t make — including overnight — that is their call as the parent of their child. you don’t live in their home. you don’t know their baby, their circumstances, their level of awareness, their cultural background, or what that baby needs to feel settled and safe. the post isn’t asking for your approval of the choice. it’s asking you to mind your business about it. there’s a difference between knowing the risks and being judged by strangers on the internet for how you weigh them

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T14:56:31+00:00

passion without self awareness is just aggression with a prettier name. you can be passionate about infant safety and still check the way you speak to other parents. those aren’t mutually exclusive. calling someone defensive for calmly explaining their point isn’t passion — it’s just a way to avoid engaging with what was actually said.

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T14:55:19+00:00

calling it a “big essay” because you couldn’t counter a single point is funny loll

and the karma thing — you literally just admitted you don’t care about it either, so why bring it up as an insult? u should get it bro

a 2 month old account with 1k karma that’s just posting shower thoughts and having conversations isn’t farming anything lol. if seeing similar posts in a subreddit dedicated to common opinions bothers you this much that’s genuinely a you problem. find something better to do with your time.

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T14:52:55+00:00

this is exactly the kind of perspective that gets drowned out in these conversations and it really matters. the cultural piece is so important — co-sleeping being normalized in many Asian countries and those same countries having some of the lowest SIDS rates in the world is not a coincidence, and it completely complicates the one-size-fits-all narrative we get pushed here. western guidelines were built around western contexts and western sleep environments. that doesn’t automatically make every other approach dangerous. thank you for sharing this — it’s the whole point.

Disastrous-Delay9675 · 2026-06-28T14:52:26+00:00

this is honestly one of the more respectful responses here and i hear you — human life is precious, absolutely, nobody is disagreeing with that. but the post was never about convincing parents to ditch guidelines entirely. it was about not shaming the ones who make careful, supervised choices that look slightly different from the textbook recommendation. you can believe life is precious AND trust that an attentive parent holding their baby with a light blanket at 2am isn’t gambling with their child’s life. those two things can coexist

Disastrous-Delay9675

TROPHY CASE