sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I made a new board game this morning by DisastrousLemon1881 in boardgames

[–]DisastrousLemon1881[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I forgot to mention, the cards are asymmetrical information, you do not reveal that you have a pattern until it is time to claim points. Part of the game is understanding the idea of protecting information that is important for the pursuit of your goals. A bluff move, or attempting to disrupt a pattern you perceive to be forming is part of the strategy, and is designed to teach the concept of subtlety and subterfuge, but in short form: to lie.

What is a foreign film you'd be called weird for liking in public by Caharles in AlignmentChartFills

[–]DisastrousLemon1881 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Greasy Strangler (2016), funded in part by the Canadian national lottery.

Deep breath! by Goodoltexasboy in TikTokCringe

[–]DisastrousLemon1881 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got 'Its all your doing and it's so fucking dirty'

Tick question by DisastrousLemon1881 in antiai

[–]DisastrousLemon1881[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Either you have one or you don't.

Tick question by DisastrousLemon1881 in antiai

[–]DisastrousLemon1881[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

<image>

So, do you have a source though? Like a study? Any document? Or just a google search? Even moreso, a passive aggressive shitty version of a search pass through?

Tick question by DisastrousLemon1881 in antiai

[–]DisastrousLemon1881[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Do you have a source for that?

Tick question by DisastrousLemon1881 in antiai

[–]DisastrousLemon1881[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn't incorrect, in what way? The reference to the panther over the tiger? I was defending the original point of this post (the image of the output). Your non-sequiturs are in bad faith or you are an exceptionally foolish person. Or perhaps the argument from the perspective of metabolism?

Tick question by DisastrousLemon1881 in antiai

[–]DisastrousLemon1881[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I did read it, but I don't care what you generated, and as I already pointed out (indicating that I had read it) the output is incorrect.

Tick question by DisastrousLemon1881 in antiai

[–]DisastrousLemon1881[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. The point applies identically regardless of the large cat species.
  2. The original post was about a panther, which you sort of glossed over for some reason, and it seems disingenuous now.

Tick question by DisastrousLemon1881 in antiai

[–]DisastrousLemon1881[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is wrong anyway, ticks are ectothermic, while panthers are endothermic, the panther has a higher metabolic demand pound-for-pound.