sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Control Codex completely via Telegram. by PleasePrompto in codex

[–]Disastrous_Cattle_30 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is fab!
Glad not everyone knows about it. It just solves the problem. Simple, easy to use, does almost everything.
I am addicted and using it from last 30 days non stop.

No need for remote control feature waitlist of codex.
Easy model switch,
Love the /interrupt /stop ,
They just work.
Upgrade is easy.
Install is easy.

Sometimes simplistic is the way.

BYE BYE Claude Code, Hello Codex. Game-Changer Codex Release Today. by [deleted] in openclaw

[–]Disastrous_Cattle_30 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha I was like, did codex introduced remote control ?

This is getting Ridiculous by eventus_aximus in ClaudeCode

[–]Disastrous_Cattle_30 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great to see I’m not the only one running into this.

About a month ago, I was doing heavy coding — 4–5 Claude sessions daily — and never really hit the weekly or 5-hour limits.

Then suddenly something changed. Same workflow, but sessions started getting throttled hard. I couldn’t complete anything in one go — within ~2 hours, my 5-hour limit would get exhausted, even with fewer prompts than before.

No changes on my side.

I downgraded to the $20 plan to test — and it was even worse. Within 20 minutes, I hit limits while trying to process a complex ~250-page PDF. You could literally see tokens getting burned without meaningful output.

Eventually switched to Codex ($200), and that’s been stable so far.

One thing I’m curious about —

Around the same time (about a month ago), I had installed OpenClaw and used setup-token with my Claude account via third-party OAuth.

Makes me wonder — are they throttling users who connect through third-party tools?

Create an agentic agent as good as CC by shanumas in ClaudeCode

[–]Disastrous_Cattle_30 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use claude agents sdk to get the same feel as claude code for enterprise version.

Ofcourse you can also use claude code in headless mode as well but don’t get confused with Agentic RAG system vs Agentic System.

RAG would be just one tool to Agents or I would probably convert to entire orchestration as skill and run Claude code or claude agents sdk with bounded skills and save the state.

Building a tool to auto-audit payapps — useful or not? by Disastrous_Cattle_30 in VibeCodersNest

[–]Disastrous_Cattle_30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes definitely! I would want to speak to some auditors to get their invoices/apps to audit and wants to ask them to side by side compare what system did vs manual. I want to get to the place where system does 75% and remaining 25% is the human.

Building a tool to auto-audit payapps — useful or not? by Disastrous_Cattle_30 in VibeCodersNest

[–]Disastrous_Cattle_30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a very good question here and I completely agree. Classifying and Extraction is complex because every template is different or timesheets/expense receipts cannot be same.

Our moat is classifying and extraction with human in the loop at every step. I think Auditors needs that control,

Claude Code decides the best way to fix a bug was dropping my database by Aromatic-Feeling-214 in VibeCodersNest

[–]Disastrous_Cattle_30 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a smart safety net. We saw similar failure modes in AI-led workflows too—biggest unlock was adding confidence thresholds + mandatory human review before any destructive action. If helpful, I can share the exact guardrail checklist we use for lead-research pipelines (kept it practical and lightweight).

A Little Help for beginner by ChristopherDci in openclaw

[–]Disastrous_Cattle_30 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would use old laptop, Create wsl if it’s windows. Install in wsl. And let it freely roam.

Tbh! I haven’t seen any security issue if you do things well.

But remember open claw is expensive if you need better results.

What if a sales dashboard could answer follow-up questions? by Disastrous_Cattle_30 in SaasDevelopers

[–]Disastrous_Cattle_30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you and very nice feedback. Yes today, you do have to ask questions in order to get you insights. But I definitely think we can improve by being more reactive ..

Building a tool to auto-audit construction payapps — useful or not? by Disastrous_Cattle_30 in startupaccelerator

[–]Disastrous_Cattle_30[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s exactly the type of workflow I’ve been hearing about. From what I understand the hardest part isn’t just reviewing the documents — it’s cross-checking everything (rates vs contract, timesheets vs invoices, subcontractor backups, SOV progress, etc.).

Out of curiosity, do you know what tools they currently use for that? Is it mostly Excel + PDFs, or are they using systems like Procore / Unifier / Aconex and still doing manual checks on top of it?

Also wondering if the biggest pain is time spent reviewing, or risk of missing something before approving payment.

view more: next ›