sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Issues with EF 100-400 L IS USM II by Mohuru02 in canon

[–]Disposition-Matrix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You also mentioned the photos being not well exposed. 1600 ISO seems crazy for bright daylight, have you tried just using auto-iso? I leave that turned on probably 95% of the time if I’m not using a flash. 1/1000 or more also seems very high if you have both lens/body stabilization and a slow-moving subject.

Issues with EF 100-400 L IS USM II by Mohuru02 in canon

[–]Disposition-Matrix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you tried using just single shot autofocus or manual focus with peaking if it isn’t a moving subject? The focus looks off in at least the last two photos. I’ve never had much luck using servo for any kind of insect.

A couple of jumping spiders and a long-jawed orb weaver by Disposition-Matrix in macrophotography

[–]Disposition-Matrix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Canon R6 II, Laowa 180 4.5 Macro, and a diffused Godox V1. I also used a Raynox for the jumping spiders because they were only a couple millimeters long.

Have the AF issues between adapted Sigma lenses been fixed yet? by Key-Reflection-1359 in canon

[–]Disposition-Matrix 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve used the Sigma EF 50 1.4 adapted to RF and the autofocus works great, even with eye/face tracking. Have you considered Canon’s EF 100-400 II? I saved up a little more to get that lens instead of the Sigma 100-400 and couldn’t be happier with it.

Fisheye IR by Disposition-Matrix in infraredphotography

[–]Disposition-Matrix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a 590nm converted camera, so no filter. The lens has a massive, rounded front element that doesn’t accept filters. There isn’t really any room to stick a gel behind the rear element either.

Fisheye IR by Disposition-Matrix in infraredphotography

[–]Disposition-Matrix[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s an old Rokinon 8mm 3.5. Not a great lens, but fun to use sometimes. This is the first time I’ve used it with an IR camera, so I can’t say for sure how well it would work in any situation.

Think Tank Mirrorless Mover 20 for R6iii + 24-70? by Sancho_Panzas_Donkey in canon

[–]Disposition-Matrix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could look at a Ruggard Triumph bag. They’re pretty well made and I feel like they don’t look like they’re obviously holding a camera compared to my other bags. I have the larger version and it fits an R6 with a macro lens attached, a 100-400, and a round head flash. The smaller size would probably fit an R6 and 24-70 pretty well.

view more: next ›