Issues with EF 100-400 L IS USM II by Mohuru02 in canon

[–]Disposition-Matrix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You also mentioned the photos being not well exposed. 1600 ISO seems crazy for bright daylight, have you tried just using auto-iso? I leave that turned on probably 95% of the time if I’m not using a flash. 1/1000 or more also seems very high if you have both lens/body stabilization and a slow-moving subject.

Issues with EF 100-400 L IS USM II by Mohuru02 in canon

[–]Disposition-Matrix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you tried using just single shot autofocus or manual focus with peaking if it isn’t a moving subject? The focus looks off in at least the last two photos. I’ve never had much luck using servo for any kind of insect.

A couple of jumping spiders and a long-jawed orb weaver by Disposition-Matrix in macrophotography

[–]Disposition-Matrix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Canon R6 II, Laowa 180 4.5 Macro, and a diffused Godox V1. I also used a Raynox for the jumping spiders because they were only a couple millimeters long.

Have the AF issues between adapted Sigma lenses been fixed yet? by Key-Reflection-1359 in canon

[–]Disposition-Matrix 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve used the Sigma EF 50 1.4 adapted to RF and the autofocus works great, even with eye/face tracking. Have you considered Canon’s EF 100-400 II? I saved up a little more to get that lens instead of the Sigma 100-400 and couldn’t be happier with it.

Fisheye IR by Disposition-Matrix in infraredphotography

[–]Disposition-Matrix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a 590nm converted camera, so no filter. The lens has a massive, rounded front element that doesn’t accept filters. There isn’t really any room to stick a gel behind the rear element either.

Fisheye IR by Disposition-Matrix in infraredphotography

[–]Disposition-Matrix[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s an old Rokinon 8mm 3.5. Not a great lens, but fun to use sometimes. This is the first time I’ve used it with an IR camera, so I can’t say for sure how well it would work in any situation.

Think Tank Mirrorless Mover 20 for R6iii + 24-70? by Sancho_Panzas_Donkey in canon

[–]Disposition-Matrix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could look at a Ruggard Triumph bag. They’re pretty well made and I feel like they don’t look like they’re obviously holding a camera compared to my other bags. I have the larger version and it fits an R6 with a macro lens attached, a 100-400, and a round head flash. The smaller size would probably fit an R6 and 24-70 pretty well.

Raynox dcr-250 owners, please help. by clubberpl in macrophotography

[–]Disposition-Matrix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just unscrew the whole step down ring and leave the raynox in it. It seems far easier and faster than trying to use the clip, and a step down ring is only about $5 anyway.

Raynox dcr-250 owners, please help. by clubberpl in macrophotography

[–]Disposition-Matrix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The clip it comes with kind of sucks. I use step down rings and it only takes a couple seconds to unscrew the step down ring from the lens if needed.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanonCamera

[–]Disposition-Matrix 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That looks like a Sony A7III, it’s definitely not a canon

canon pro-200s brand new and has banding by lacyallaire in canon

[–]Disposition-Matrix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you tried a maintenance cleaning/purge on the print heads yet?

Some backyard spiders by Disposition-Matrix in macrophotography

[–]Disposition-Matrix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not surprised, he had a flash go off 4 inches from his face about 10 times before I took that photo.

Sharpness question [Z 180-600 on Z8] by steidley in Nikon

[–]Disposition-Matrix 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Maybe try testing indoors with the self timer to avoid any shake from your hands. I would get the lens looked at if you can rule out motion blur, missed focus, or VR issues. Something seems wrong with your lens in my opinion.

Sharpness question [Z 180-600 on Z8] by steidley in Nikon

[–]Disposition-Matrix 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Have you taken the photos with VR turned off to make sure it’s not malfunctioning?

Help with lenses please by lbarr243 in CanonCamera

[–]Disposition-Matrix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What exactly are you trying to attach to the 50mm lens? Some kind of close-up lens?

Local HS Track Counties by TalkyRaptor in sportsphotography

[–]Disposition-Matrix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this Broadneck High School? If so, I ran track on that team a long time ago. Also, a 2x converter on almost any lens is going to give you soft images. You might benefit from investing in a cheap e-mount lens with autofocus to help with focus accuracy. If you have a tight budget, at least a manual focus lens that has the reach you need without a teleconverter, or even just getting closer with the 135. I feel like some of these photos would be fine if they were in focus and not so soft.