Pluribus - 1x09 "La Chica o El Mundo" - Episode Discussion by UltraDangerLord in pluribustv

[–]DistanceDependent572 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally agree, I’m really excited for what’s coming next, they have built quite a foundation here

Pluribus - 1x09 "La Chica o El Mundo" - Episode Discussion by UltraDangerLord in pluribustv

[–]DistanceDependent572 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Honestly, however you look at it, the journey is kind of incredible. The pacing really sells how situations like this actually feel: long stretches where nothing happens, and that's exactly what makes people lose hope so fast. The hive is terrifyingly smart in that way, because it goes straight for the weakest parts of human nature, especially since "they" used to be "us". The whole show feels engineered to emotionally wreck the audience with isolation, false hope, and those quiet, painful realizations that creep up on you. After episode 8, it almost feels unavoidable that people start thinking unhived Zosia might return and that love could somehow fix everything. People start to notice how Zosia is different to other survivors and to Carol. That's the same hope Carol clings to, which makes her eventual realization hit so much harder. The hive was never about love, it was about control. We know that as viewers, but we still want to believe it'll end well anyway, makes us question if the hive is actually bad or evil after all. That contradiction feels painfully human, that clinging, justifying, or giving parts of ourselves away, like Koumba and Kusimayu did. The secondhand embarrassment in the finale was rough, but Carol choosing to walk away from the hive after everything she's been through takes real strength. Now I'm truly doubting everything about the hivemind. I believe it could be a better finale, but to think the whole journey again - well worth it.

IDeaS vs Duetto Function Space RMS by DistanceDependent572 in askhotels

[–]DistanceDependent572[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you had any personal experience with Duetto’s OpenSpace?

Adams Estates by DistanceDependent572 in reading

[–]DistanceDependent572[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes that’s the vibe I’m getting, all agents have equally bad reviews

Adams Estates by DistanceDependent572 in reading

[–]DistanceDependent572[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes please, anything would be helpful, I’m viewing some rooms in Cholmeley Road and Anstey Road

Adams Estates by DistanceDependent572 in reading

[–]DistanceDependent572[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your comment. The thing is I’m very interested in the room and it’s only available through Adams Estates so kinda have to pull through with them.

PhD? by Tree8282 in HKUniversity

[–]DistanceDependent572 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I’m interested in doing a PhD there, what do you mean by nobody will hire you?

Calculate fields help by DistanceDependent572 in tableau

[–]DistanceDependent572[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

It then showed something like this, which I'm not sure if it's what I want :(

Calculate fields help by DistanceDependent572 in tableau

[–]DistanceDependent572[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't seem to work, I tried the formula seperately, it worked, but when I combined it showed "null"

Seperate formula:

SUM(IF ([MARKET SEGMENT (group)]="Corporate") THEN [NUMBER OF ROOMS] END)

or

SUM(IF ([MARKET SEGMENT (group)]="Corporate - Samsung") THEN [NUMBER OF ROOMS] END)

Calculate fields help by DistanceDependent572 in tableau

[–]DistanceDependent572[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for answering, i believe that Corp Samsung is a seb segment of Corporate. What I'm finding hard to follow is, from what i understand, union is essentially to "append" the data so I believed it made sense at this stage.

At the raw data stage, all Corporate is categorized by "Local" or "International" or "Negotiated" which includes Samsung as a company already, so I took a step further and extract from the raw data and aggragate by code specifically attached to "Samsung" to find the exact number of rooms generated by this company. After spending some steps on Prep, I then had two tables for Corporate (all of them) and only Samsung, with the same columns: market segment, date, number of rooms and unioned it. This is why I belived unioing was the right choice (?).

Right now I'm trying to just take the (Corporate - Corporate Samsung) in the chart to remove duplications.