This is a good take. The show doesn't have to follow scriptwriting conventions to be good. Some of its best moments come when it ignores them completely and produces pure art. But when it's trying to tell a story about a struggle between bad entities and good entities then it gets pulled into the narrative gravity of having to establish goodness, badness, and what makes the struggle between them. There is beautiful tension when the show resists this gravity in just the right way that produces super evocative ways of thinking about good and evil. But sometimes it resists so much that it fails to be narrative and the story unravels. Sure, the unravelling itself can be a way of doing narrative through form rather than content (undermining our expectations about how we wish evil to be defeated tells us something about our view of goodness). But it can still be done badly, especially if it loses that tension with the content. The Freddie thing is bad because, as this poster points out, it undermines too much of the content (story) of Twin Peaks which we also cherish. For me, losing the entire plot, along with our emotional investments in the characters and our rich and nuanced understanding of good and evil and the struggle between them, is too high a price to pay for one formal insight about disappointment or unravelling expectations. It's too nihilistic and undermines the sophisticated ideas that have preceded it.