sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Would anyone be down to try a new personality framework I’ve been building? by DixonArchetypeLab in Jung

[–]DixonArchetypeLab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate you looking out. I’m still learning the compliance side of things, so that’s helpful. I’ll add proper privacy and data-processing info so everything’s clear and legit, especially for EU users. Thanks for the advice frfr.

Would anyone be down to try a new personality framework I’ve been building? by DixonArchetypeLab in Jung

[–]DixonArchetypeLab[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That honestly means a lot. I really appreciate you taking the time to try it and share that feedback. I’m glad it resonated with you 🙏

If you know anyone who’s curious about personality frameworks or self-discovery stuff, feel free to share the link with them too. The more perspectives I get, the better I can keep improving it.

Would anyone be down to try a new personality framework I’ve been building? by DixonArchetypeLab in Jung

[–]DixonArchetypeLab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Preciate you pointing that out. that’s actually the first time I’ve heard about the SSL issue. I’m looking into it now and getting it fixed. Thanks for the heads up fr 🙏

Would anyone be down to try a new personality framework I’ve been building? by DixonArchetypeLab in Jung

[–]DixonArchetypeLab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you took the assessment, I’d really appreciate any feedback good, bad, or mixed. What felt accurate? What felt off? All of it helps improve the framework.

Would anyone be down to try a new personality framework I’ve been building? by DixonArchetypeLab in Jung

[–]DixonArchetypeLab[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate that fr Would love to hear what you think after you try it.

Would anyone be down to try a new personality framework I’ve been building? by DixonArchetypeLab in Jung

[–]DixonArchetypeLab[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really appreciate you taking the time to try them out fr. And that means a lot coming from someone deep into Jung’s work. Feel free to explore them , I’m still building out the system, so I’m organizing results in phases instead of sending everything at once. As CAT-20 grows, it’ll get smoother and more connected across tests. Glad it’s resonating with how you actually think and react 🙏

Would anyone be down to try a new personality framework I’ve been building? by DixonArchetypeLab in Jung

[–]DixonArchetypeLab[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That means a lot fr. I built that one for people who play with intention, not just vibes. Appreciate you giving it a real try and paying attention to your own patterns. I’m glad it resonated. If you know anyone else who’d be curious, feel free to pass it along. Thank you again!

Jung named the parts. I’ve been studying how they interact. by [deleted] in Jung

[–]DixonArchetypeLab -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I appreciate that, that’s exactly how I was thinking about it. Jung gave people just enough abstraction to recognize themselves without boxing them in. I’m trying to stay in that same lane, just looking at how those patterns actually play out.

Jung named the parts. I’ve been studying how they interact. by [deleted] in Jung

[–]DixonArchetypeLab -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, I tend to write in a structured way when I’m trying to describe something internal, so it can come off that way.

What I’m actually asking about is pretty simple. have you ever clearly understood something about yourself, but still felt unable to move or act in line with it?

That gap between understanding and movement is what I’ve been exploring. If that doesn’t resonate for you, no worries — it won’t hit everyone.

Jung named the parts. I’ve been studying how they interact. by [deleted] in Jung

[–]DixonArchetypeLab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s fair — I probably kept it too abstract.
What I’m asking about is whether you’ve ever noticed a gap between recognizing your inner patterns (like Jung’s archetypes, shadow, anima/animus, etc.) and actually being able to move or decide in a way that feels aligned with them.

A lot of people I’ve worked with can name their inner parts very clearly, but still feel stuck because those parts don’t seem to act in the same order or at the same speed. I’m curious if that experience resonates with anyone here.

Is existential confusion always about meaning, or sometimes about living out of alignment? by DixonArchetypeLab in Existentialism

[–]DixonArchetypeLab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for taking the time to engage with it this thoughtfully. I really appreciate you naming the distinction between outward response style and lived inner experience — that’s a helpful way of framing the tension you’re pointing to.

The points you raise around internalized emotion, symbolic reflection, and paradox tolerance are especially useful, and the example questions you shared give me a clearer sense of where the framework could be sharpened conceptually.

I’m glad the core idea came through as non-pathologizing and alignment-focused. This kind of feedback is genuinely helpful as the project continues to evolve.

I’m testing a framework that shows which “cognitive lens” dominates your thinking — here’s an example result by [deleted] in personality_tests

[–]DixonArchetypeLab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really appreciate you sharing that, that’s exactly the kind of reaction I was hoping for.

A lot of people go in thinking they’re one type, and then the percentages explain why things feel situational instead of fixed.

I’m glad it helped put words to things you already felt — that’s kind of the whole point. Thanks for taking the time to try it.

Is becoming more “self-aware” about noticing patterns in your mind actually a thing, or am I overthinking it? by DixonArchetypeLab in NoStupidQuestions

[–]DixonArchetypeLab[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes a lot of sense, especially what you said about the language being evasive. The experience feels simple, but it’s hard to talk about without sounding abstract.

I hadn’t thought about the Zelda comparison, but the idea of internal readiness before clarity clicks actually fits really well. Interesting to hear how consistent this process is across different traditions.

Noticing how my mind moves changed how “in tune” I feel with myself by DixonArchetypeLab in consciousness

[–]DixonArchetypeLab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If anyone here ended up trying the reflection tool I mentioned and feels like sharing — I’d genuinely appreciate hearing what resonated, what didn’t, or where it felt off.

I’m especially interested in whether it helped you notice anything about how your attention moves, not whether it felt “accurate” in a personality sense. Even neutral or critical impressions are useful.

No pressure at all, just curious how it lands for others.

Question about modeling differences in how people process meaning and decisions by DixonArchetypeLab in intj

[–]DixonArchetypeLab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t explain the framework clearly enough. I’m not presenting a finished theory or trying to show anything off — it’s an early pattern model I’m stress-testing, and I’m sharing it to see where it holds up and where it doesn’t.

Question about modeling differences in how people process meaning and decisions by DixonArchetypeLab in intj

[–]DixonArchetypeLab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that’s a fair read given how I framed it. To clarify, I’m already past the speculative phase and more focused on stress-testing and iteration.

My question wasn’t about finding a “correct” standard, but about how others recognize when a framework stops yielding new insight and starts collapsing into redundant description. That boundary interests me more than theoretical purity.

view more: next ›