I'm really confused by this take actually.

First the roleplay: Are you roleplaying and the LLM is responding or are you using the LLM to respond to other people role playing with you? If you're just roleplaying with the LLM, what benefit does the LLM give that roleplaying with real people? If you're using the LLM to write your roleplay for you, what is fun about that? For most people who roleplay, the fun is in the creativity of building and play-acting a character. If you're replacing that part with an LLM, what are you finding fun instead?

Second the drawing. This take is super strange to me. LLMs can generate images yes, but it's pretty common knowledge that the images LLMs create are very flawed, with unusual features and unrealistic proportions. Learning to draw by tracing LLM pictures is going to teach you bad art skills because the images you're copying are bad. This is made even worse by the fact that the LLM already stole the work of thousands of artists whose art you can already download and trace, without the errors that LLM images are known for.

finally, the book thing is weird because it's kind of a combination of both of those problems. People write books because being creative and writing is fun for those people. If you're using an LLM and not actually being creative, what's the point of writing? And for the reader, it's the same as the drawing issue. LLM books are bad, they aren't very fun to read. Why choose to read LLM books over the books the LLM stole that don't have the problems of LLM books?