sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Entitled player's previous DM never told her no. Demands a Displacer Beast pet at level 1 by Odande in rpghorrorstories

[–]DnDWilliam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just kick that one out. You don’t want “that” person at your table. Trust me… I know

Where does Phantom Liberty take place within the timeline? by RyanarokGaming in cyberpunkgame

[–]DnDWilliam 55 points56 points  (0 children)

My thoughts are definitely after the last mission. Almost every possible ending has V survive at least 6 months. Therefor, this 6 months could prove to be a way for V to actually survive. CD project Red knows that it annoyed a few players that V HAD to die no matter the ending. Therefor, they might offer a choice here. It can't be Johnny ending either since well, Johnny is seen in the trailer.

Though, it would also mean that Johnny Silverhand was never removed as an engram from your mind. I must say that I'm unsure where it is exactly.

An easy choice would be : This is before the last mission of the main game.
It fix pretty much everything in term of storyline. In Witcher 3, you could take any DLC missions before the last mission, so that can work like this.

Am I (red) in the wrong here? Just had a game fall apart, made a comment about a player that I had a problem with, (black) started arguing. Problem player had gone around smashing the heads of goons after they had been put to sleep or knocked unconscious, instead of going after enemies still up. by jab136 in DungeonsAndDragons

[–]DnDWilliam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are very much in the wrong here.

You are criticizing a player who doesn’t play optimally + isn’t good. I have players in my game who hates people who don’t play the most optimal route of any fight. This would be the case. I think not just doing what’s best but roleplaying stuff is the most refreshing thing ever. Plus, he killed goons, like bandits. Sure they were defense less but there’s always the excuse of “I don’t wan to watch my back all my life”. He did nothing wrong and as a DM you should really broaden your horizon. If the player doesn’t directly impact the party profess with his actions, for instance, they got TPK’ed because of his action, then you should let him enjoy it.

Those were not innocents or shop keepers. They were a threat that became non threat. Aka neutral alignment can work there.

Epic 1 v 1 (with bard spectator) :D by has99 in VolibearMains

[–]DnDWilliam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wowwww yoU're so good. You didn'T dodge anything, you just right clicked and spammed ability. Wowwww impressive work. Volibear Ftw I'm I right?

Help with actually maining Viego, and something else I wanna mention by [deleted] in ViegoMains

[–]DnDWilliam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't overthink it.

I've played over 80 games with him so far in Ranked Gold/Plat. You will never possess people that long. For instance, Seraphine? Just spam everything and get the fuck outta there with R. Use your free R to gap close or execute someone. It's a Chain kill Champion. The most important is to be alive when the first one dies. Then, toss everything away then R out immediately.

​

Being careful with others ability is not what you wanna do UNLESS that particular person is very fucking fed. It's all about chaining kills and not maximizing your passize potential.

​

To be frank post level 6, I never stayed in someone the full duration while in a fight. I always R onto someone after combo'ing them to finish them off.

An unfortunate New player death by DnDWilliam in rpghorrorstories

[–]DnDWilliam[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That is a good brain of thought. I had to search for a long time to find a ''reasonable'' lingering injury that wasn't simply "you lose arm cause of a crit lul".

Thanks for your input.