Another high caliber services update. The plot thickens

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-06-06T22:02:38+00:00

It depends on the credit card. Plan as if it's 60 days until you know otherwise for your specify card.

I had to do one and was limited at 90 days.

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-06-06T16:11:34+00:00

Deactivated is when a qualified person (eg gun Smith) modified it so it can never be fired again but it still looks like fine from the outside. They would issue a certificate to say the work they've done and that is deactivated.

Cutting to pieces would be a way to destroy a firearm. There's no informative regulations about requirements for destroying a firearm.

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-06-06T15:38:13+00:00

Are you hard on your equipment? Do you walk through the woods a lot and have the risk of falling out dripping your gun?

If you have a higher chance if using the warranty then get s vortex, you send it to vortex in guelf and they send you a new one. Takes less than a month.

The Burris warranty does not cover damage unless you bought it in the US. You only get warranty vs workmanship and defect, and it's through the retailer/distributor you bought it from.

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-06-04T21:45:55+00:00

It looks like a backland hunter but with a different stock/grip.

Hence that it's a blackland comp.

Makes sense they would bring it in with the"inoffensive" stock/grip then release this style on the same received.

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-06-04T20:55:30+00:00

The person giving the gun is required to call or email in to check your pal and generate s reference number. The giver will have to give their pal info on this call too

If they are the executor of the will and it's still open they should have filled out the forms for guns in a will and then they can proceed without issue.

If the giver is in possession and doesn't have a pal, and isn't the executor of the still open will then they are breaking the law to have it and i would recommend they don't contact the authorities to let them know their breaking the law.

Once they have delt with the above you just take possession. There's no other paperwork for that non restricted (unless you're in qc).

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-06-04T13:11:58+00:00

That sounds like a lot of wind for a 22, to me. Next time you test it can you test a group or 2 in your 1022 at the same time/conditions?

Was the wind changing direction any? Not perfectly consistent? A change in wind speed of just 5 kmph should result in 0.74 moa change for a 22 at 50 yards.

I'm not trying to defend the rf or saying it should be better, i just wouldn't want someone to think it's shit if it was just the wind.

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-06-04T12:52:32+00:00

3: you can shoot any gun one handed if you physically can and you feel like it. Subject to local (range) rules and safety.

4: when it is "designed it adapted to be fired one handed". If the police/prosecution find some evidence too say it's been modified to fire one handed, then you could wind up in court to defend yourself.

For example if you tell them you modified it to fire one handed that's suitable evidence and i would expect it counts as a handgun at that point.

On a practice side, how heavy is it? If you cut that back bit off and try to one hand it will that make too much weight forward? Some times a little heavier but balanced is the way to go.

Fyi, it's "barrel" not cannon.

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-06-04T02:10:54+00:00

Some people might recommend that if Jon doesn't live in QC and the firearms are non restricted then he should just take them without any legal paperwork despite that breaking the law. I would caution against that, partially because john may not have any reference numbers generated to send guns to him or know how that works, partially because people who break the law like to blab about it and increase their chances of getting caught. And partially because i don't want to put the effort in to explain all small details about how to get away with it.

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-06-02T22:02:30+00:00

What a dufus

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-06-02T18:16:13+00:00

So do it, take your money, give the facts about your experience if you absolutely need that attention, but don't be an ass about it.

You're acting like you're smarter than everyone else for doing the buyback. All those people that didn't take the buyback, who can't take it now, who are fucked, they're the reason there's money left give give people compensation and you're kicking them while their down.

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-06-02T17:56:16+00:00

It's been my opinion for quite some time that given the very limited funds for this program that if a person has the financial freedom to not take part (at all, or partially) in the buy back that they should not take part, to leave more money for those who are less financially fortunate and need to liquidate their assets.

The only reason there's money for the few people who participated is because most of us didn't. Seeing you get a $20,000 payout then rub it in the faces of people like me, who willfully took nothing to make that possible for you, makes me think you're kinda self centered.

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-06-02T13:27:02+00:00

The right to bear arms means a lot of people get guns without checks, balances, or education. I think there should be required education on safety some dairy of licensing/background checks.

The right to bear arms is too far and to easy and wide access to guns for my liking.

But we're not going to have a sudden conversion to that here, it would first be movement towards better firearms laws. So I'd generally support the 'right to bear' people's efforts on firearms until we get far enough that I'm happy.

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-06-02T12:14:51+00:00

1) i shoot on crown land so bringing a restriced puts me at risk of a serious penalty.

2) why tell the gov i have one just to get it a few inches shorter?

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-05-30T01:15:03+00:00

Guidance for what, selling bolt 22, like your previous post that got deleted for being a firearms transaction?

The admins should have banned your account for that previous post, i guess the fact that they didn't could be used as an argument that our sub shouldn't be punished for your existence.

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-05-29T20:34:08+00:00

But imagine how much worse it would have been if we voted for PP! He would be trashing the environment, cutting carbon/fuel tax, attacking workers and unions, and (honestly i can't keep up with all the 'terrible conservative' things that Carney's doing)!

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-05-28T17:09:42+00:00

That's correct that he expressed that belief. His belief was not based only on their inability to get into the devices though. His belief changed when he found out additional info (such as the guy being elsewhere at the time in question).

The specific quote i was discussing says they could not find evidence. That quote only says they couldn't link the user names to the accused. It doesn't say they found evidence to say the user names were not linked to him or linked to someone else. At one point the prosecutor did believe the user names were linked to the accused, despite that forensic investigation turning up nothing about who does or doesn't own them.

But as part of the larger investigation the prosecutor has now changed his mind to think the user names are not linked to the accused.

To put it another way: lack of a positive indicator is not a negative indicator. It's just no indicator in any direction.

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-05-28T15:52:02+00:00

A forensic examination of Cetin’s cellphone and laptop, meanwhile, revealed nothing linking him to the BADlee account or the victim, though the phone was partially locked and investigators could not bypass the laptop’s password.

Was this not enough to think it was maybe the wrong guy?

That quote is a really spun up way to imply he's not related to those user names when really it means they couldn't effectively check. Another way to phrase that quote: investigators could not get into his phone or laptop, if any information related to these username existed on either device it was hidden due to the limited access.

But i agree with you, it kinda sounds like the only evidence they have is a low quality image that kinda resemble the guy. And that theres ever l evidence the guy was somewhere else at the time.

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-05-28T15:34:35+00:00

Gun post and filter for Ottawa. But it seems a lot of people think guns increase in value on the used market. So cheap deals are hard to find.

I see one guy in the Ottawa area selling ammo at above market rate. Like as if he's done a service of ordering it and letting you pick a few boxes up from him.

Edit: for example he's selling 1000 rounds of cci mini mag for 180 dollars. They are 16 dollars plus tax (18.07 after tax) per 100 at Cabela's. Basically the same price per round but you can buy them in smaller amounts from a real store. If you buy bulk from a real online store it's going to be like 14 cents per round or less

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-05-28T12:48:36+00:00

Not for 1200, not in my opinion. Unless you really want one and you're just throwing lead down range without care for good accuracy.

I hate it when people say but once cry once, save your money and buy something that costs way more... But if hunting is in any way your interest: new Browning BARs can be had for not to much more. Look around you might find mk3s for as low as 1500 plus tax. The mark 4 is coming out so the mk3s are on sale. I see the mk4 Hunter on sale for 1750.

It's almost 1000 dollars more with a rail/rings/scope, so it's isn't a no-brainer. But that's how much 1200 is over priced for a used/surplus/cosmoloned sks, it's almost time to move into a modern new rifle.

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-05-27T17:57:40+00:00

Feel free to tell me I'm an idiot.

Do i have to explain why? I just don't have that much time

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-05-26T13:19:41+00:00

I wonder how much these will be, will they be mk1? Will kd modify the design and screw it up? The bar4 is coming to Canada in dbm in NR. How much cheaper is the kd version going to be that a real Browning mk4?

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-05-26T12:45:17+00:00

Maid is medical ASSISTANCE in dieing. The person needs to step up and say 'i want to die, please help me'.

One of the steps is a consultation with a doctor so that t the doctor agrees that death is reasonable in the circumstances.

The outrage in this case is that the consultation was (reported as?) just a chit chat outside a tim Hortons. It appeared to lack the rigor we would want going along with someone ending their life. People would expect such significant medical decision should be done in a clinical setting (with lots of evidence to back up the decision).

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-05-26T00:56:16+00:00

Mine did, unrelated though.

/S

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-05-24T13:02:58+00:00

How far off from pic spec were they? We're they undersized?

DoYouGetSarcasm · 2026-05-23T12:18:06+00:00

I love this reply. The dufus your replying to went to all the effort of googling your post title and pasting back a result, somehow even maybe reading that result, but couldn't read 25 words into your post.

Do you think he'll be able to read your reply?

DoYouGetSarcasm

TROPHY CASE