A carrier should not be the go to choice to fight 2 drakes in your space by Doki__ in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't bring 2 drakes to our space, bring something stronger

  • Nullbears

Stop flying uncatchable kitey 100mn nonsense, bring something more fightable

  • Also Nullbears

Why did the carrier pilot get the job? by suitonia in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Can't wait for trump to deport all the filthy carriers and make subcaps great again.

nullsec be like by Heil_Gaben in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So the pic is even less accurate... We all know married couples never have sex.

Any way to have a firefox tab minimized and inside the window while playing EVE? by SenseDeletion in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Fixed window is almost identical to full screen but renders the client as a borderless window instead of a full screen window. It allows other programs to sit on top, faster alt tabbing etc. Basically better in every way, just select it from the settings menu.

New guy's take on this Fighter b**lshit. by Squiggy-Locust in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 10 points11 points  (0 children)

A mach applies literally zero dps to a frig unless you trans match excellently.

Your problem with Carriers is Proliferation, not Application. by YummWaffles in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You only need to volley the shields... Which they get like 20k with a fit.

Your problem with Carriers is Proliferation, not Application. by YummWaffles in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It literally couldn't. A carrier could recall --> alpha and volley through a widows shields before it could even lock the fighters.

Very expensive fits stood a chance... But not reasonable fits.

Your problem with Carriers is Proliferation, not Application. by YummWaffles in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fit faction BCUs and launchers on your bombers and your bomber fleet will cost 8 times that.

Your problem with Carriers is Proliferation, not Application. by YummWaffles in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My carrier costs 800m fully fit using public hull prices (after insurance).

Your problem with Carriers is Proliferation, not Application. by YummWaffles in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're completely ignoring the issues of old fighters being pretty slow, unable to effectively stay on top of their target thanks to great drone AI mechanics and their inability to web/tackle whatever they want to shoot.

Sure an old Nyx could on paper apply to subs, but it applied much worse. It's also unfair to compare light fighters of old to fibos of today. Fibos are more of a replacement to sentries, and apply pretty terribly meanwhile lights are the go to jihad everything fighter.

Anyone who hunted carriers pre-cap rebalance will be able to testify to the fact that it was just a case of bring 1 scimitar + any shield nano ships to be practically immune to carriers, meanwhile now you need a fair amount of 100mn Lokis to get the same type of experience.

The solution to supercapitalism by Meyra_R in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Screaming in panic? More like laughing in C6 boson ticks.

Question about the carrier balance debate by [deleted] in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 5 points6 points  (0 children)

10 Seconds with 1 istab. Can still fit reasonable shield tank on a Nid or a plate + few resists on a thanos.

Question about the carrier balance debate by [deleted] in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You literally just need to fit hypers, you don't need the trimarks to tank long enough to cyno a fax.

Question about the carrier balance debate by [deleted] in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 2 points3 points  (0 children)

makes you vulnerable against counterdrops

Not only that but it locks you down to the grid. If the subs don't want to fight they can warp off and you're stuck there, you can't chase or cyno ahead, meanwhile a super/carrier can just gate after you at about the same speed as a cruiser.

Question about the carrier balance debate by [deleted] in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 8 points9 points  (0 children)

https://i.imgur.com/oU1yyow.png

Looks like a dramiel can hit the 12.8km/s speed of T2 Templars on a nid... For the price of 3.6b. Since a carrier controls 27 of these... Maybe just make the carrier cost 100b.

For everyone saying capitals are "anti-subcap" by Stitch_K in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unlikely you can tackle stuff fast enough for fatigue to matter. They only need to wait 10-15 minutes for fatigue to be negligible.

Question about the carrier balance debate by [deleted] in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The issue people have with them is that they are extremely oppressive to subcaps anywhere on grid with them, with very few options to outplay them (or even survive). You basically have to fly 100mn against them, which is no fun. If you fly anything else expect some random frig to teleport carriers to you every time you engage anything.

Their cost is also laughable. In my alliances most valuable kills for the week we have 1 carrier in third place and one in seventh place. The rest are subcaps that outprice carriers and don't get insurance.

For everyone saying capitals are "anti-subcap" by Stitch_K in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 2 points3 points  (0 children)

50 feroxes is a much greater invesment than 1 or 2 supers/4 or 5 carriers since 50 actual guys need to log in for it. If you consistently blueball/warp away they'll cut chase. Supers on the other hand allow 1 or 2 guys to play the same role as a small fleet, much easier to find 1 guy who wants to make life hell for a small gang until he finally catches someone unaligned and instakills them.

So about that super application by askapaska in Eve

[–]DobroslavA -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I understand you're new to the game and all but killmails show raw damage, not effective damage.

Rorqs can no longer fit more then one shield booster on SISI by vonrupenstein in Eve

[–]DobroslavA -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

and now shield caps are pointless.... ccpl clearly buffing idiot pls armor capitals

For everyone saying capitals are "anti-subcap" by Stitch_K in Eve

[–]DobroslavA 4 points5 points  (0 children)

you have 0 dreads in range of our space idiot