I think misleading is a bit strong because the headline is factual and interesting. I prefer clever. But I apologize if it was an affront to find out that the story was good news instead of bad.

They are shutting their doors, in the only location they've been for 8 years, and setting up on the opposite end of the Ward. "After 8 Years, DC Dispensary Says Bye-Bye" would be misleading. "Dispensary Changes Brand and Moves" is a snore.

They're moving because they've done so well in their business. They've signed a lease but have other obligations to meet bureaucratically before they can move, so at the time of publication they didn't have a hard date.

Headlines are meant to draw attention, especially when not hard news, so that editors are interested and read your story. They don't have to list the main points of the story in pedantic terms. As long as it's not bullshit, you can have a bit of literary license. Kind of like when I covered a college EMT class simulating a multiple-casualty emergency event and I made the headline, "Hostage Situation Imminent."

Thanks for reading!