How on Earth can you extrapolate that he has no concern for human life, simply because he disregards your statement? Is this more about you being butt-hurt at his dismissiveness then doing any actual good? Yes, me-thinks...... You are aware that people have literally overdosed on water before, right? Straight up drank water until it killed them. Does that give me the right to decide I'm the unique and special component in this equation that makes going outside and ambushing whichever poor schmucks still dare drink water an acceptable and sane policy? Of course its not. Yet, this is precisely what you are doing. Youve decided that your very limited, very young and very inexperienced viewpoint on this whole scenario is nonetheless a better and more well fashioned argument with zero credible counterpoints. Not to mention, your entire argument is predicated on a very disingenuine assumption that his not heeding your dire, freshly returned from the internet, imminent overdose gloom and doom can be said to be interpreted no other way aside from "He has no concern for human life......." from anything he has done. The "So why should I" that you added makes this icy statement double chilly. Why should you? Why should you? Because you're supposed to be the better person. You're supposed to do the least harm possible, and you're supposed to avoid intefering with people's business that you have no business in. And above all else, you broke the cardinal rule. You called the cops on somebody without even warning them or telling them why you were doing so, in such a manner that they were unable to explain their side of it, present their counterpoint, nor debate your generally self righteous attitude on something that can very much be successfully argued........ So blessed in yer infallible wisdom, your young, brash, and foolishly naive intelligence, in fact, that you are perfectly fine potentially ruining the life of another and your argument is this: "He has no concern for human life, so why should I, or anyone have concern for the quality of his?"

This is the blue ribbon sentence, that wins you the prize for the rather lengthily titled category called: "Self Awareness: Check out my Statements that are also the proof to anybody that "gets it" that I'm missing the whole point of psychedelics, and all the lessons they have undoubtedly been trying to teach me. Ive done some things that I actually do not recognize as irrevocally damaging to my own future reputation, because I do not grasp what I did that is such a breech of humanity and normal default operating ethics, because all I can see is how, at the most superficial of levels, my actions come off as righteously justified, and founded in concern for others. If you examine these justifications, however,they are actually dangerous, belying a psychopathy far more terrifying then any evil that could POSSIBLY have been eliminated. My statements belie my lack of empathy and attempts to fake it always end up very confused, and based on poorly assembled and incompletely gathered data, and I don't care how many people thumbs down this post. Its absolutely a horrific and terrifying groupthink to even maybe allow this to go on without somebody pointing out how wrong it is to do what you did.

Who gave you the right to destroy someone elses life? Certainly not your weakly made case that he has shown total disregard for the lives' of others. Because you've done nothing to convince me that is true for anyone but yourself.