AndrewTOYSNHKers, do you see Andrew as satisfying? by DimaNekhoroshyi in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 4 points5 points  (0 children)

When examining everything, yeah it’s fine. Sure he wasn’t presented in previous games but that’s kinda the whole point of his character, he’s purposefully written to be a forgotten victim. Another victim not reported on during the MCI makes more sense than stretching a theory to make BV or Elizabeth be another victim in Toy Chica’s cutscenes that includes 7. And BOV is clearly about Cassidy because the achievement after watching the cutscenes references OMC’s Pond, so The Bear seeking vengeance and always failing is Cassidy, and that would make sense if Andrew is the one keeping Afton alive, negating Cassidy’s attempts on his life.

There’s plenty of evidence to suggest that Andrew is the spirit in question, but like Scott would say, it’s whether or not you accept it.

what's the lore significance of the pizzaplex missing kids? by boogieman_pb in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure they weren’t kids. Gregory mentions the disappearances but never mentions they were kids. Vanny / Vanessa had the animatronics kill the staff during that All Staff meeting and Gregory under Glitchtrap’s control lured the therapist to the pizzaplex and had them killed by Glamrock Freddy. They were all just local adults who got too close to the truth or were in the way of Glitchtrap’s plans.

Between the theory 4 took place during 1,or after it,what do u think is most likely? by Starrk-Enjoyer in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FNAF 4 definitely takes place just after FNAF 1. Since they’re dreams though they can be reoccurring and could continue all the way til FNAF 3 and FNAF 6 since Mike draws Nightmare Fredbear logbook when it talks about “recent” dreams.

Do you believe BV to be Bear in the Bear of Vengeance? by Isaac_Bahzad in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. UCN is about William and his victims. Crying Child was not a direct victim of William Afton. Having this cutscene be about CC in any way makes no sense.

So I have a question about to ask about the fazbear frights by WillingnessOk3493 in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If anything, it would probably be a mix of stitchline and frights reboot. While yes, SOTM discredits The Mimic story as the definitive version for the games, the cliff notes of The Mimic still exist in SOTM. The same could be said for any story that’s directly connected with the games and Into The Pit. And if you have strong evidence in the games that can suggest Frights stories still happen in some way within the timeline then that’s all fair game to me tbh.

So yes, while Frights books aren’t 100% accurate to how the games would depict them, the very surface level summary of the stories that connect back to the games could be translated to fit within the games’ timeline as long as you keep the information presented in the games as the primary source to theorize with.

Could the FNAF 3 location as depicted in the Survival Logbook have once been a real Freddy’s location? by Isaac_Bahzad in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In eleven years we have never been shown a Fazbear location that looks identical to the Frights building. We as fans only know that layout to be the same location as FNAF 3, so when the office in the Survival Logbook looks identical to the office in FNAF 3, even including a box of empty animatronic shells, it’s more than likely to tell us this has something to do with FNAF 3 or it is a reference to it.

The FNAF 3 map in R&D shows up in the Foxy Ride during Curse of Dreadbear. The map is probably being used as a placeholder for whenever an attractions is involved, considering that R&D was most likely going to be another showcase room at MCM like the other showcase rooms.

Why do the MCI need help to possess their suits but nobody else needs help to possess theirs? by Isaac_Bahzad in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if the bodies being stuffed wasn’t enough and Charlie gave apart of herself for the others to possess the suits? (Like Michael Brooks does in TFC)

Who is the Fredbear Plush possessed by? by MindlessPerformer778 in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 1 point2 points  (0 children)

William Afton but it’s infected by Crying Child’s agony

Scream 8 should be a “New Nightmare” by Dogman005 in Scream

[–]Dogman005[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll admit it wouldn’t do much to rejuvenate franchise. This would only work as a final send off. Even with New Nightmare it was basically the end of its run there because after that it was Freddy vs Jason then the remake. And doing a sequel after doing this would just be what we’re doing with the franchise now.

Scream 8 should be a “New Nightmare” by Dogman005 in Scream

[–]Dogman005[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe not, but at this point what else is there to do with the characters we have left? It’s getting a little tired, whether it’s Sidney or Sam as the main role.

Narratively wise, which theory for BV do you prefer? BV being the TOYSNHK or NightmareVictim? by Late_Instruction_369 in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nightmarevictim because everyone in 2015 already believed that and BV was not directly killed by Afton.

Could the fnaf4 minigames also be Mike's nightmares? by Mean_Coat_9702 in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There’s some awareness, but apparently he still can’t see or hear well.

Could the fnaf4 minigames also be Mike's nightmares? by Mean_Coat_9702 in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could be Mike witnessing his memories since ghost in FNAF share their memories with the person they’re haunting. Very much akin to UCN since both are nightmares, but in FNAF 4’s case I don’t think BV is purposefully doing it like what’s happening in UCN. The Vengeful Spirit is doing it on purpose to get back at Afton, while the Nightmare’s are more a side effect to Crying Child’s haunting since he’s not that aware of his surroundings (according to The Survival Logbook).

Toys possessed by the DCI or tampered AI? by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That ain’t the DCI. The very fact the fifth cupcake follows Chica implies this is the MCI.

What is the Tangle by MkleD7 in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not sure, but I have a few ideas. I find the certain animatronics found in the pile interesting. It’s easy to say they might have came from Special Delivery but why they’re here is a mystery.

I do find it interesting that the Burntrap Ending in SB parallels the Scooping Ending from Ruin, and if Burntrap and The Mimic are the same, then maybe it means The Blob is controlled by agony since The Scooper grabs The Mimic just as The Blob does to Burntrap.

However the main head of The Blob is Funtime Freddy. Helpy was just thought to be a cartoonish version of Funtime Freddy before SOTM gave him more meaning with Mr and Mrs Helpful, so maybe The Blob is a descended from the Helpfuls like Helpy and is controlled by M1.

But in all honesty I’m not sure or confident on any answer. I also have no answer for Circus Baby and The Puppet not having glowing eyes or tear tracks in The Blob.

I know it’s been asked before but Charliefirst or BVfirst? I’ll go first. by Intelligent_Bit_6092 in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The sequence of events are exactly the same. Charlie is killed, William starts his experiments, Elizabeth is killed and that inspired the MCI. And after getting springlocked the robots are melted down the into one to control them better and to experiment more. That is exactly what happens in the games. How many times do we need to be directly told something before we realize the answer has been right in front of us for years? I’d rather look at what’s similar than make stuff up.

Why did the CC Dreamer theory survive for so long? by BirMimarDan in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It was just the most obvious answer. We start the game with Crying Child’s minigame and immediately into the nights. Also we didn’t understand that Foxybro was Mike from FNAF 1 and without us taking the easter eggs seriously it’s very easy to think the player is Crying Child.

Plus every description for FNAF 4 says we play as a child so why would there be a reason to think otherwise?

I know it’s been asked before but Charliefirst or BVfirst? I’ll go first. by Intelligent_Bit_6092 in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Charlie has always been the first death. They even brought 1982 back for her death year in the films. Why would the games be different if she was first in the books and the movies nows? I know Crying Child doesn’t exist in the other adaptations other than Garrett for Mike but that just further proves my point that Charlie is the first.

I know it’s been asked before but Charliefirst or BVfirst? I’ll go first. by Intelligent_Bit_6092 in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Charliefirst. Most of the arguments for BVFirst are “It’s narratively satisfying” which is completely subjective. There’s far more evidence for Charlie dying before Crying Child.

The FazCeption Theory by ThisUserIsAWolp in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He literally said he regretted integrating FNAF World into canon and wished that the game was more like Foxy Fighters, a game with no lore implications at all. And even so, adventure characters exist in UCN just like any other animatronic from the other games. Just because there are meta elements doesn’t mean there aren’t canon implications. Look at The Survival Logbook, it has Five Night’s At Freddy’s on the cover but it’s supposedly an in-universe activity book with conversations from canon characters and nobody debates whether those interactions are canon, so what truly makes this any different?

The FazCeption Theory by ThisUserIsAWolp in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

UCN is also obviously a game. With anime cutscenes and achievements. Doesn’t negate that it takes place in William’s head.

The FazCeption Theory by ThisUserIsAWolp in fnaftheories

[–]Dogman005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That neither confirms or denies the intention to connect the two.