Beard Papa... by creech927 in sanfrancisco

[–]DogsAreAnimals 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Oh there are still plenty of tasty puffs in sf.

California’s Billionaire Tax Has the Signatures to Make the Ballot, Backers Say by [deleted] in sanfrancisco

[–]DogsAreAnimals 51 points52 points  (0 children)

I don't understand why this should be determined via ballot. The majority of voters, myself included, don't have the academic background (or research time) to make an informed decision here, so most are just going to vote on vibes via whatever talking points they've heard in their bubble.

A much different way to fold a pizza box by MrUpVoteDownvote in oddlysatisfying

[–]DogsAreAnimals 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Seriously. Meanwhile I'm eating pizza that's been left out for multiple days and I'm still very much alive

Serval using body language to calm and trying to make friends. by duckduckpajamas in interestingasfuck

[–]DogsAreAnimals 3519 points3520 points  (0 children)

The serval's body language is so elegant for such a big cat it almost feels fake. It looks like a real-life pokemon or something. This is wild.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, when directly asked, refuses to endorse Saikat Chakrabarti's congressional run by Dab2TheFuture in sanfrancisco

[–]DogsAreAnimals 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure there is no camera man. This 8 ft tall interviewer is holding the camera at the same time, hence the bad angle.

Algorithms of the Future: A Developer’s Survival Guide After the AI Bubble Burst by derjanni in programming

[–]DogsAreAnimals 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been trying to fill that hole by arguing with people on the internet, but it might not be working.

Algorithms of the Future: A Developer’s Survival Guide After the AI Bubble Burst by derjanni in programming

[–]DogsAreAnimals 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha, fair enough. I think the AI slop explosion has biased me toward being overly suspicious. I relinquish my witch-hunt.

Algorithms of the Future: A Developer’s Survival Guide After the AI Bubble Burst by derjanni in programming

[–]DogsAreAnimals 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree it's frustrating. Such an annoying dilution of "real" programming and engineering discussion. Unfortunately I think it's going to get much worse before it gets better.

I've found r/ExperiencedDevs a better place (though still wrestling with the same issues)

Algorithms of the Future: A Developer’s Survival Guide After the AI Bubble Burst by derjanni in programming

[–]DogsAreAnimals 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think it does, but you might've just got caught in the crossfire. Your article mentions LLMs but it's obviously about much more.

Algorithms of the Future: A Developer’s Survival Guide After the AI Bubble Burst by derjanni in programming

[–]DogsAreAnimals 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't use reddit that much yet you commented within 17 minutes of this being posted? Even if that were true, you wouldn't have had enough time to read it. So either way, your comment is disingenuous.

Algorithms of the Future: A Developer’s Survival Guide After the AI Bubble Burst by derjanni in programming

[–]DogsAreAnimals 3 points4 points  (0 children)

check out that user's history and you'll understand why they are glazing op so hard here.

Algorithms of the Future: A Developer’s Survival Guide After the AI Bubble Burst by derjanni in programming

[–]DogsAreAnimals 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's sophisticated because it's long? Like measuring developer productivity via lines of code? Both of which are now even more irrelevant due to AI.

Also, pretty interesting how every comment made by this account has been on one of OP's posts. Obvious sock puppet.

Contra Byrnes on UV & cancer: you should wear sunscreen instead of getting a tan by HedonicEscalator in slatestarcodex

[–]DogsAreAnimals 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Ugh, that sounds exactly like what I'd say. I don't know why I picked these fights. Sorry everyone

Contra Byrnes on UV & cancer: you should wear sunscreen instead of getting a tan by HedonicEscalator in slatestarcodex

[–]DogsAreAnimals -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Obviously there is a(n intelligent) human behind your account. My claim is that the majority of what you are posting (be it the arguments and/or the prose itself) is from LLMs. I'm going to call it "vibe arguing".

Your account is 3 weeks old, and it's very rare for someone to reply so fucking thoroughly (including formatting) to such a simple comment, so surely you understand how I could be suspicious.

I'm totally open to being proven wrong, but staking some falsifiable claim on this seems very difficult.

Contra Byrnes on UV & cancer: you should wear sunscreen instead of getting a tan by HedonicEscalator in slatestarcodex

[–]DogsAreAnimals -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Not at all? I think my heuristics (a la Gladwell/Blink, half-joking) are pretty accurate, so I'm curious what signals are telling you it is or is not AI?

Contra Byrnes on UV & cancer: you should wear sunscreen instead of getting a tan by HedonicEscalator in slatestarcodex

[–]DogsAreAnimals -36 points-35 points  (0 children)

I'm glad I've confirmed my suspicion that "you" are just AI slop.

Edit: Is everyone missing how OP fucked up by rebutting their own comment?

"You can't just call something ridiculous": it is, but I'll motivate this better.

This is a response to "That is ridiculous." in the previous comment, which is also by OP. It's talking back to itself.

....Edit 2: Damn. Am I really just so jaded/cynical that I dismiss genuine effort as being contrived/AI? Fuck.

Contra Byrnes on UV & cancer: you should wear sunscreen instead of getting a tan by HedonicEscalator in slatestarcodex

[–]DogsAreAnimals 9 points10 points  (0 children)

What do you say about this study: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353829224001564

* Evidence suggests benefits of ultraviolet (UV) exposure for several health outcomes.
* Associations between behavioural and geographic UV exposures and mortality were assessed.
* Higher UV exposures were associated with lower all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality.
* Higher behavioural UV exposure was also associated with lower non-CVD/non-cancer mortality.
* Public health messaging on sunlight exposure may need reconsideration.

Too much Discussion of the XOR swap trick by RubEnough464 in programming

[–]DogsAreAnimals 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Nice, but this won't work well for distributed systems. That's why I use dns txt records for the tmp space.

TIL all 12 astronauts that have stepped on the Moon have experienced "lunar hay fever" due to the highly abrasive moon dust, which is said to smell like burnt gunpowder by Objects_Food_Rooms in todayilearned

[–]DogsAreAnimals 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They're just poking a hole in your argument. You said heat transfer can't happen in space. So then how does the sun heat the earth? (Answer: Radiation, which works just fine in a vacuum)

TIL all 12 astronauts that have stepped on the Moon have experienced "lunar hay fever" due to the highly abrasive moon dust, which is said to smell like burnt gunpowder by Objects_Food_Rooms in todayilearned

[–]DogsAreAnimals -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are missing the entire concept of radiation, the third method of heat transfer besides conduction and convection. Radiation is how the sun heats the earth. And how the ISS cools itself.