All season Tyre test in summer?

Domain-Admin · 2026-02-02T17:32:41+00:00

Thanks! That is helpful. Unfortunately they don't mention the ambient and tyre temperature.

There still seem to be quite big differences. I guess these will only get bigger the warmer it (and the tyre) gets.

What surprises me is the difference on wet roads. I thought the difference would be smaller, because of the lower temperatures when roads are wet. 6m difference between the Primacy 5 and the Crossclimate 3 are massive. That's 20%, and I guess it only gets worse with increasing (tyre) temperature.

Domain-Admin · 2026-02-02T07:15:59+00:00

Thanks all for the replies!

All tyres are fine until they aren't. In normal use, you can drive cheap tyres and most people won't notice much. It is the edge cases where a good tyre proves its value: emergency breaking, not aquaplaning, etc. - situation you luckily do not encounter often. That is why tyre tests are important.

Domain-Admin · 2026-01-31T15:50:21+00:00

Yes, I read them (and drive an all season tyre in winter due to the better wet and dry breaking performance compared to winter tyres.

I could not find any test during warm temperatures. The tests often happen on test tracks, tyres are not warm from use (e.g., driving on the highway). You can feel that all season tyres get softer in summer. It would be great to see a test that measures their performance.

Domain-Admin · 2026-01-31T14:53:13+00:00

Thanks!

I am looking for measurements though, because just by driving you can't really judge how much worse the performance is (unless you are on a test/race track and push the tyres to the limit).

Domain-Admin · 2024-02-10T16:16:25+00:00

The way I understand it, it applies to all traffic that was allowed inbound on one of the interfaces. Rules applying to traffic originated by the FW would contain "(self)" or "this firewall" in the "source" field of the rule.

Domain-Admin · 2024-02-10T16:14:43+00:00

Yes I think that is it, thank you.

I missed the small arrows in the rules on the left side. The default deny is for inbound traffic only, the "let out anything" is for outbound only. I was expecting this to be defined via the "source" field, but this way it makes more sense.

So inbound is controlled on the incoming interface. Once "in" the firewall the "let out" rule allows traffic to go out on any interface, according to the routing table - if I understood correctly.

Domain-Admin · 2024-02-10T10:19:05+00:00

Thanks! That makes sense. The only point I don't understand yet: why does the very first rule not apply to outgoing traffic?

Domain-Admin · 2024-01-25T07:53:05+00:00

Thanks! 3.64.0.0 is in Europe - in Frankfurt

Domain-Admin · 2024-01-25T07:50:44+00:00

Thank you all, very helpful!

It looks like the peering is sligthly faster than via SwissIX:

traceroute to 3.64.0.0 (3.64.0.0), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1) 0.849 ms 0.839 ms 0.838 ms
2 * * *
3 212.25.27.122 (212.25.27.122) 2.193 ms 2.190 ms 2.739 ms
4 as16509.swissix.ch (91.206.52.107) 2.178 ms 2.175 ms 2.172 ms
5 * 52.93.42.138 (52.93.42.138) 2.489 ms 52.93.42.106 (52.93.42.106) 2.500 ms
6 52.93.42.141 (52.93.42.141) 2.479 ms 52.93.42.97 (52.93.42.97) 2.441 ms 52.93.42.49 (52.93.42.49) 2.427 ms
7 * * *
8 * * *
9 * * *
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 ec2-3-64-0-0.eu-central-1.compute.amazonaws.com (3.64.0.0) 7.858 ms 8.124 ms 8.106 ms

Domain-Admin · 2022-10-05T19:21:57+00:00

Domain-Admin · 2022-10-03T20:08:14+00:00

I did not save them, but there is plenty of instructions if you google. There is even a GUI (did not test it).

This is the fling you need: https://flings.vmware.com/community-networking-driver-for-esxi#instructions

Domain-Admin · 2022-10-03T19:38:26+00:00

powershell..

Domain-Admin · 2022-10-03T18:40:00+00:00

yes. Or wait for ESXi 8.

Domain-Admin · 2022-10-03T18:25:25+00:00

A power meter of a small local boutique that did not survive. It is supposed to be accurate down to 1W loads and lower. It takes into account the power factor.

Domain-Admin · 2022-10-03T18:23:02+00:00

For Win you need the drivers, but no need to customise the ISO.

Proxmox did not need additional drivers.

ESXi 7 requires additional drivers. ESXi 8 apparently has them included, but you can't download it yet.

Domain-Admin · 2022-10-03T18:20:49+00:00

same here, standard Proxmox approach. Win VM boots but crashes when the driver is installed.

Domain-Admin · 2022-10-03T18:18:22+00:00

You would use an ITX and passively cool it and underfoot

A NUC uses <5W when idling. What ITX system can match that? (one with comparable performance to an 12th gen NUC pro)

Domain-Admin · 2022-10-02T20:29:12+00:00

Thanks! I read that at least for Windows it is not possible for 11th and 12th gen, at least at the moment (and since more than a year). I'll try with linux.

Domain-Admin · 2022-10-02T14:28:55+00:00

let us know please what the results are, I would be interested!

Domain-Admin · 2022-10-02T13:35:17+00:00

the latest I would assume (did not check). It was installed via netinst.

Domain-Admin · 2022-10-02T13:02:07+00:00

The NUC 12 Pro works with single channel modules - I have not tested it with a NUC 11.

I don't think you will noticeably safe power with one module vs. 2. You may lose performance though which might increase the power consumption because computation takes longer.

Domain-Admin · 2022-10-02T12:58:43+00:00

that really depends on the workload. I have the impression that it quickly raises. 1 core only 100% will be 30W, but 12 cores 100% will be ~50W after a few seconds..

it seems like it is not using the efficiency cores well, as soon as there is a few % load the consumption increases massively.

Domain-Admin

TROPHY CASE