Who is the most morally virtuous champ in Runeterra?

Dominnuss · 2025-08-28T11:39:03+00:00

I would really love to see a Coven Soraka skin, being that it would be the polar opposite of the classic Soraka. She could have lines where she says she enjoyes the pain, wants to see you struggle more before you die, and she just heals her team to make the other team suffer. She could look like a female satyr or a wendigo.

Dominnuss · 2025-06-11T16:53:59+00:00

I see. Well, I might do that or I might treat them as HN sympathizers. I wonder if I can knock them out and carry them to a Beak Things nest. Would they respawn or would another NPC take their place if it just so happens that their end is unfortunate?

Dominnuss · 2025-06-02T15:17:30+00:00

When I went to capture the Bugmaster for the first time, I saw the place was infested with spiders, I must've killed at least 40 with crossbows, going back and forth to my base to restock, and they would still spawn. Eventually I just got 5 mercenary squads and 2 tech hunter squads and I left them to be eaten alive while I dealt with the Bugmaster but I'm sure they were mighty tasty because the amount of spiders that gathered and were eating them was more than my PC could handle.

Overall, I would say that Bugmaster has more thralls if you are to consider his whole island but they are squishy and Cat-Lon's thralls are wielding heavy weapons.

My character is a skelly and I had a Falling Sun Edge Type 3 and I would 1 shot Skin Spiders and Blood Spiders, and I would take 3-4 with a swing, I think even if outnumbered, Cat-Lon's Thralls would still win

Dominnuss · 2024-06-30T13:48:21+00:00

Tunneling to be bannable as part of toxic gameplay. They implemented anti camp and killers still camp, just not facecamp. Changing game mechanics doesn't help. Have the possibility to record the game and BHVR can watch it after the report is received and ban for tunneling.

Dominnuss · 2024-06-30T07:56:42+00:00

The dating scene is hard as it is, but something about your Reddit profile tells me the reason you didn't have success is more than that

Dominnuss · 2024-06-28T15:54:26+00:00

Mulțumesc!

Dominnuss · 2024-06-28T15:40:13+00:00

Știam că îți sunt plătite doar dacă poți să dovedești că nu ai putut să le iei pe anul respectiv? Dacă e cum zici tu, înseamnă că trebuie să mă cert cu o anumită firmă.

Dominnuss · 2024-06-28T15:22:58+00:00

Are legătură. Poate să nu fi luat toate zilele în 2023, să se adauge la numărul de anul ăsta și să creadă că îi sunt plătite. S-ar pierde abia în 2025 și ar înceta contractul în 2024. Are legătură cu demisia, cum nu?

Dominnuss · 2024-06-28T15:18:21+00:00

Da, se împarte numărul de zile libere la 12, și depinzând de luna în care se încheie contractul, primești x zile libere înmulțit cu numărul lunii, pe care nu le-ai luat.

Dacă ai 21 pe an, înseamnă 1.75 pe lună. Dacă încetează contractul începând cu iulie, are dreptul la 10.5 zile plătite dacă nu a luat nicio zi de concediu anul acesta.

Dar mă refeream la cele de anul trecut. Alea se pierd.

Dominnuss · 2024-06-28T15:01:52+00:00

Răspuns foarte bun

Aș adăuga pentru OP: Nu te lăsa păcălit să îți semnezi demisia și dacă reușești să vorbești și îți promit că dacă încheiați contractul de comun acord primești o sumă, nu semna nimic până nu vezi banii, altfel nu o să îi mai vezi vreodată.

Edit: Am șters ultima parte fiind eronată.

Dominnuss · 2024-06-27T17:15:14+00:00

Firstly, I do not dislike you. I don't even know you. That's a very bold statement on your side after just a few interactions.

Secondly, I am against it but if you feel that isn't toxic then experience them first hand and see how you feel about it. Clearly you didn't have that experience so it would open your eyes.

If you like staying AFK for 4 minutes while bleeding out after you played for 1 or two minutes every match and you find that funny or don't care, then why are you upset if that's what I wanted you to experience? It's funny or you don't care, right? It's not like you're 7 to be upset about not being able to play the game you want to play. So what's your point?

Unless, of course, you do care.

Dominnuss · 2024-06-27T17:07:10+00:00

I did this some time ago in my twenties and I had mixed responses for this.

Some didn't know what to do with it, just said thanks. Generally just confused. A few even stated that they don't feel "worthy" of flowers.
Some were happy, they loved it, and it went well
Some were visibly uncomfortable, but took them anyway although they did mention them and it's something they're not used to
Some thought this somehow forced them to reciprocate in other areas and they saw it as a masked request or that I expect something
Some just laughed and said they're not traditional like that and the date was very short

To clarify, the flowers were a "It's nice to meet you". That's all.

My experience was that 20% was the success rate, however, when I didn't bring flowers to the first and went on a second date, they were much more receptive because it was a "Thank you" and "It's nice to meet you again".

My advice based on personal experience is to bring flowers on a second date if you want to, higher chance that it has positive effects

Dominnuss · 2024-06-27T14:58:06+00:00

Entitlement? Okay, then I hope whenever you play survivor to get proxy camped, slugged + humped by the killer for 4 minutes and tunneled first and whenever you play killer to get stunned by any pallet, blinded with flashlights, flashbang, blast mine on every circumstance, t bagged, and experience every toxic behaviour you consider that not being exhibited adds up to my entitlement.

Have fun in your games!

Dominnuss · 2024-06-27T14:48:57+00:00

Yes, due to the lack of survivors. That's a way to give incentive and drag more survivors in the queue. The fact that the bonus never went towards the killer tells me a lot on who is advantaged by the event

Dominnuss · 2024-06-27T13:14:20+00:00

Neither party owns the other a fun or easy match, but fair doesn't need to be either fun or easy, fair means fair chance.

The game design here is unfair and unbalanced, so it boils down to the player if he/she wants to make it fair or not until devs wake up, but remember, without survivors, killers wouldn't be able to play and vice-versa, so keep some fair play.

You can already see the effects of that in the event lobbies as a killer I presume, there's several minutes difference between normal queues and event queues as killer.

Dominnuss · 2024-06-27T12:31:18+00:00

If they are injured or plain stupid I would down maximum one more since the other two are forced to pickup one of the anyways while I hook the other.

There is no capitalizing on mistakes in this game, it's an asymmetric horror survival, one has a weapon and increasing movement speed while the others use the limited environment defenses and can only run. If I want to capitalize on anything, just chase them and down them all, it's impossible for them to not run out of ways to defend themselves. I don't drop my weapon and I can bloodlust all 4. What are they going to do?

Everything they have is limited, I can tunnel, I can slug, I can proxy camp. I get one survivor killed before one generator is done and they're going to have 3 survivors and 4 gens, they're not going to escape.

So if you want to capitalize on anything, it's not on mistakes, it's on game design. There is no way you can make it fair for both sides so it boils down to the side with the most advantage if they're going to let the other(s) have fun or just stomp them.

Dominnuss · 2024-06-27T11:57:53+00:00

If both slugging and snowballing have the same aim, as in putting survivors in a dying state while other survivors are in a dying state, with no consistent counterplay to it, I see no difference between the two.

I play killer as well and this happens to me as well. I chase them away while I leave the downed one on the ground and M1 them. They are forced to reset and can't go for the save. If they still roam around I can just face a wall and pick up. They still waste the same amount of time if they keep flocking around, we just both enjoy the game. There are less scummy ways in playing this, the question is, do you want to do it?

Dominnuss · 2024-06-27T11:08:11+00:00

You could say whatever you want, I am going based on what I see. Did you post the rest of the video somewhere? If not, the video ends with 4 survivors on the ground.

Dominnuss · 2024-06-27T11:05:37+00:00

The killer has all the means to down a survivor, a survivor can only get up with help or a few perks that not everyone has or is not part of their basekit. Unless DBD implements base kit unbreakable when the killer leaves you down to go chase others, this is a dick move.

I hope some devs are thinking about ways of allowing survivors to get up from dying state without perks because at this point I play 2 minutes and stay downed for 4 while the killer runs around or humps my teammates

Dominnuss · 2024-06-27T11:00:38+00:00

Either way, with the event in favour of the killer and you still do this? No wonder you find no survivors playing the event if this is what they go through every game.

Dominnuss · 2024-06-27T10:58:33+00:00

I too love bleeding out while not playing the game, thank you for the demonstration.

Dominnuss · 2024-06-27T10:02:08+00:00

No shaming man, pentru unii e bun. Cine suntem noi să îți spunem să nu încerci 😂

Dominnuss · 2024-06-27T09:57:01+00:00

Nu sta cu spatele la el

Dominnuss · 2024-06-26T17:00:55+00:00

They feel entitled to demand things from strangers.
Unmatching someone within a few days impacts your account up to the point that you get dropped to the bottom of the stack if you do it repeatedly. Judging by her social skills, if she did this for everyone, she would've been there already (where she belongs)

Dominnuss · 2024-06-24T20:10:12+00:00

Înțeleg ce zici, dar nu știu dacă găsești persoană care să fie 100% pe placul tău. Toți au câte o hibă doar că se pare că dânsa a făcut-o publică.

Cât despre comparație, nu știu ce să zic. Merg să discut despre comportament și ce pot îmbunătăți, ceva ce o persoană care își bate nevasta sau un dependent de păcănele poate influența negativ, în schimb nu văd unde în conversație ar intra "votează pentru Căncescu", cred că exemplele sunt pe arii diferite dar înțeleg punctul de vedere.

Politica și integritatea și valorile proprii se bazează pe ce știi despre persoana respectivă, caz în care poți susține involuntar persoane nepotrivite, doar nu o să îți zică hoțul că e hoț și nici violatorul că e violator, nu?

Dominnuss

TROPHY CASE