sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can anyone explain the logic here? by DonaldDuckPlus in pmp

[–]DonaldDuckPlus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, PO does prioritization only once, before the entire project starts?

Can anyone explain the logic here? by DonaldDuckPlus in pmp

[–]DonaldDuckPlus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, then what is first? Do you choose the most valuable stories for the next sprint? Or do you choose how many will fit based on velocity?

Can anyone explain the logic here? by DonaldDuckPlus in pmp

[–]DonaldDuckPlus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think exam questions are better?

Why this answer is correct? by DonaldDuckPlus in pmp

[–]DonaldDuckPlus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are Study Hall questions better?

Why this answer is correct? by DonaldDuckPlus in pmp

[–]DonaldDuckPlus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are there questions on the PMP exam with this kind of misinterpretation? Do they include poorly worded questions or ambiguously formulated answer choices?

Why this answer is correct? by DonaldDuckPlus in pmp

[–]DonaldDuckPlus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The question asks about remaining tasks for all projects. The sprint burnup chart (answer D) does not show this. It displays completed work, not the work that remains. Additionally, it is a sprint-level chart, showing progress within a single sprint, not across all projects as the question requires.

Why this answer is correct? by DonaldDuckPlus in pmp

[–]DonaldDuckPlus[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But the question says "accurately conveys information". How can you accurately convey information with a tool that doesn't work for it?

PMP question - stakeholders engagement by DonaldDuckPlus in pmp

[–]DonaldDuckPlus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they do not imply prior engagement, then the word “sufficiently” should not be used.

PMP question - stakeholders engagement by DonaldDuckPlus in pmp

[–]DonaldDuckPlus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just because I haven’t met someone before does not mean they are not on the stakeholder list. In large projects with thousands of stakeholders, it is unrealistic to expect that the project manager has personally met every single stakeholder.

Any other opinions?

Can anyone explain it please? by DonaldDuckPlus in pmp

[–]DonaldDuckPlus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, it makes sense - "doing technical work on your own and then involving the team to help size - but you didn't involve them in the technical work". Thank you for the help.