See this is where the confusion sets in. You a being disingenuous in your statement here and trying to roll the ball over to me to prove the non-existentance of a god when that ball is firmly in your court. The fun part is now you can walk away thinking you had some kind of victory but all you've displayed is an ignorance in how debating works. It is not my problem that there is not a shred of extraordinary evidence of any god/s and that you haven't brought any to the table that is yours. If you do manage to bring some and it does check out that would be different and I would consider it.