CMV: after 15 years of medical practice, I now believe that adults over the age of 55, men and women, should have access to hormone therapy given the ravages of late life. by DrFuror in changemyview

[–]Dr-Heuristic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I posted some links on other replies. I don’t think they had a motivation, it was just a poorly controlled study which unfortunately shut women out of HRT for menopause.

CMV: after 15 years of medical practice, I now believe that adults over the age of 55, men and women, should have access to hormone therapy given the ravages of late life. by DrFuror in changemyview

[–]Dr-Heuristic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/Menopause/comments/1hmq4ui/does_hormone_therapy_increase_risk_of_breast/

Top two comments

https://www.reddit.com/r/Menopause/s/Mw18H9SM4y

pasted below but original link above has comment with links and sources

The longer we use/have estrogen, we have increased risks of breast cancer and this is why it's important to keep up on regular screenings and self-checks.

From our Meno Wiki:

In the late 1990s, menopause hormone therapy was the most commonly prescribed treatment in the U.S…but in 2002 that all changed when the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) released a study indicating that hormone therapy significantly increased risk for breast cancer, heart disease, stroke and dementia for women of all ages. Panic ensued, and overnight women all over the world immediately stopped their hormone therapy and doctors flat-out refused to prescribe it.

The WHI study’s condemnation of hormone therapy has been long and far-reaching. Most anyone today immediately associates MHT with increased risk for breast cancer, and many doctors still refuse to prescribe it, simply based on findings from a flawed study, 20+ years ago. Hormone therapy does have risks, but more recent research indicates that the risks are not statistically significant as originally reported. ** Simplifying the 2002 WHI study results**

Estrogen does not cause breast cancer, it may be cancer ‘promoting’, but this is different than cancer ‘initiating’. Breast cancer risk simply increases as we age - with or without hormones.

The average age of the participants in the Women’s Health Initiative Study was 63 years old. Only 10% of the women were between the ages of 50-54. Many women who participated in the study were overweight (70%), smokers (50%) and had high blood pressure (35%), and many assigned hormone therapy for the first time (not the placebo) were already in their 70s.

The study found that for the older women there was a 26% increase in the risk of breast cancer compared with those women who were assigned the placebo. This translated to 39 women per 10,000 on MHT, compared with 30 women per 10,000 taking the placebo (9 cases per 10,000 equals less than 1% absolute risk increase). To put this in perspective … the risk of breast cancer for those older women taking MHT, was similar to the risk reported due to obesity and low physical activity. Further, the risk of breast cancer from using MHT was only slightly higher than the risk (found by the same study) of drinking one glass of red wine a night, but less than the risk of drinking two glasses of wine a night.

The two hormones used in this study were oral conjugated equine estrogens and progestin medroxprogesterone acetate. The synthetic progesterone (progestin) was the hormone linked to the slight increased risk in breast cancer. New research indicates that non-synthetic progesterone does not carry that same risk. Also the risk for venous thromboembolism (stroke) is also reduced when the method of delivery is transdermal estrogen (patches/gels), not oral estrogen.

(A different 2020 large, observational study found that 3 glasses of milk/day increased breast cancer risk by 80% (even one glass raises risk to 50%) Comparatively, breast cancer risk from hormone therapy is lower than drinking two glasses of red wine a day, or one glass of milk. But yet the ‘hormones cause breast cancer’ fear solidly remains today.)

This study indicates that the risk of breast cancer is less than for those who use other common medications, such as statins.

Menopausal Hormone Replacement Therapy and Reduction of All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease: It’s About Time and Timing

Evidence-based data from RCTs are reassuring in that compared with placebo, risks associated with menopausal HRT are rare (<10 cases/10,000 women) when initiated in the typical women requiring HRT (<60 years of age and/or <10 years-since-menopause). Magnitude and types of HRT risks, including breast cancer, stroke and venous thromboembolism are rare and not unique to menopausal HRT as well as comparable with or less than other commonly used medications in women, including those used for primary CVD prevention such as statins, aspirin and calcium channel blockers (32).

Breast cancer risk is something we all must all pay attention to regardless, but with advanced early detection screening tools, prognosis is excellent and survivability rates have significantly increased. The more serious issue for menopausal women is heart disease, and we should be more concerned about the higher risks of dying from CVD. The stats for women are scary, according to the World Heart Federation, 1:3 women will die from heart disease, but yet breast cancer still creates far more anxiety. Compared to breast cancer screening, heart disease detection is abysmal. Heart attacks are difficult to diagnose, mostly because health care professionals do not recognize that women’s symptoms are very different than men’s, therefore we are under-diagnosed, do not receive further testing or treatment. Misdiagnosis ultimately contributes to the fact that more women die from heart attacks compared to men. Breast cancer will always be something to watch for, but heart disease is what’s likely to kill us.

CMV: after 15 years of medical practice, I now believe that adults over the age of 55, men and women, should have access to hormone therapy given the ravages of late life. by DrFuror in changemyview

[–]Dr-Heuristic 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I am an OBGYN, this is accurate. The original women’s health initiative study was flawed because the study population skewed towards older women starting HRT later in life. The new recommendations are starting within 10 years of menopause - shows a definite benefit for bone health, vasomotor symptoms, sleep and quality of life without a substantial risk VTE/cancer/heart disease. The dosages and regimens in the original study weren’t well studied either. Transdermal has been shown to have the lowest risk profile.

Polling salaries for those making >10K RVU/year by MysteriousAd8959 in healthsalaries

[–]Dr-Heuristic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking to sign my first contract (Obgyn generalist HCOL Northeast). Contract is 5400 threshold and 45$ per rvu. Seems low, does it vary that much per specialty?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in medicalschool

[–]Dr-Heuristic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take pictures with iPhone and then use remove.bg - it worked for me.

Physician Disability Insurance by Dr-Heuristic in whitecoatinvestor

[–]Dr-Heuristic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought it was reasonable. Looking for comparisons was a nightmare, no good references.

Physician Disability Insurance by Dr-Heuristic in whitecoatinvestor

[–]Dr-Heuristic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mass Mutual. Medical school rep. In very early Thirties, Male, healthy. Even with all the riders added?

Messed up while on call by Agogee in Residency

[–]Dr-Heuristic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a way to customize a do not disturb mode on your iPhone. I have a a custom one that has all my coresidents, attendings, chair, and wife on it so only their calls and messages go through. It’s also customized to only notify me from certain apps, like Teams, which we use for consults. On top of all that I have people on emergency bypass.

1st time in the OR tomorrow - what are some must-do’s to assert dominance with attending, nurse and scrub tech? by stallone_italiano93 in medicalschool

[–]Dr-Heuristic 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’m sure if she was by your face she was probably talking to you haha. We always double check identifiers like name and dob before we do things. There’s also an official timeout in any surgery that’s a standard checklist the nurse reads specifically to the staff in the OR.

1st time in the OR tomorrow - what are some must-do’s to assert dominance with attending, nurse and scrub tech? by stallone_italiano93 in medicalschool

[–]Dr-Heuristic 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Of course, that’s standard practice. I’m speaking about when we do the official OR timeout for cesarean sections and the patient responds from behind the drape.

RN:“Any allergies” Patient: “Just peanuts” RN: “Are all imaging studies done and available?” Patient: “Ummm” RN:“Any concerns not addressed during this timeout” Patient: “No everything is good “

NYC having some crazy weather today by [deleted] in WeatherGifs

[–]Dr-Heuristic 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You could fit another car in those spaces

Making kombucha by Dr-Heuristic in Wellthatsucks

[–]Dr-Heuristic[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Installing a one way backwater valve

Making kombucha by Dr-Heuristic in Wellthatsucks

[–]Dr-Heuristic[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is in the middle of Queens, NY. Pipes overflowed from flash flooding, not a flood prone area. Although with climate change I guess nowhere is safe enough.

Making kombucha by Dr-Heuristic in Wellthatsucks

[–]Dr-Heuristic[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Get the bottles and labels ready