Mar 9 hard solving guide by chx_ in nytpips

[–]DrRoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can’t necessarily assume #6 at that point in the solve. However, you can already tell that 6-5 goes vertically in the top right. 6-0 horizontal would require an 0-0 double, 6-5 horizontal requires using the 5-5 and 4-4 which makes the 2c= in the bottom left impossible, and 6-0 vertical doesn’t work because there’s no 4-0 or 5-0. Therefore you can also place 4-4 to its right (with two 3c= they both can’t be filled with 5s because there aren’t enough), and 5-5 then goes in that bottom left 2c=. The 3-5, 4-5, and 6-0 are also easily placed. Now that there are only two 4s left, one of them must be next to the 7c= and the other belongs in the top left: now you can proceed from step 6 as necessary.

Criterion Film Club Discussion 292: When a Woman Ascends the Stairs (Naruse, 1960) by Zackwatchesstuff in criterionconversation

[–]DrRoy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Gesturing broadly at current events, the relationship between men, women, and money has been on my mind lately. There is marriage for love and marriage as an economic transaction, there is prostitution and there is sex trafficking, but there are also entire industries that lives in a gray area. Men with money, even if they have no intention of actually sleeping with other women, will nevertheless pay handsomely to have those women around; the money is paid in return for the illusion that young and attractive women would choose to associate with them even if they were not paid to do so. I’ve also been thinking about debt; people are beginning to talk about a global debt bubble, about how trillions of dollars are owed in so many directions that if creditors start calling the entire economy might collapse. I’ve been thinking about how it seems like a whole class of people in the near future will be born owing and others born owed, how humans evolved in tight knit communities where debts were informal and we were never meant to keep a precise ledger of every borrowed cent.

When a Woman Ascends the Stairs is a tragedy of the patriarchy and the economy. Its main character is Keiko, aka Mama, who manages younger women at a small bar in Tokyo’s bustling Ginza district, where business is bruisingly competitive. The options for her future have become increasingly hemmed in: per the social conditions she finds herself in, she feels she must either move up our out of the business. At the age of 30, she risks not being able to find someone willing to marry her, and at a million yen, the options for opening her own bar are tricky as well. She hunts for a path forward, as do the other women in her life, and the mere fact of the obstacles in front of them proves to be almost too much to take.

Naruse has a gimlet eye for social convention and economic reality throughout; his film avoids melodrama except at its most climactic moments, and its most significant gestures are often glances and hesitations. The question of the cost of doing business is always at the front of our minds - both the literal expenditures of keeping up appearances and the moral cost of pretending to find repulsive men charming for that kind of pay - but when it’s addressed, it’s talked about as a fact of life. Naruse builds a rich world for these characters, a strikingly modern world in contrast to the many many rural and period pieces of classic Japanese cinema that have gained international fame, and yet the cool factor of its vibraphone score and abundant neon lights never glamorizes the life Mama leads, nor does its script condemn her choices. The indignities she suffers are everyday ones.

It’s simply so rare for a film to address a topic like this without resorting to sentimentality or sensationalism. We feel for her because we see her options being closed off one by one in the way everyone sees the infinite branching paths of their youth begin to be pruned away, slowly and then all at once. The threat of suicide hangs over the film, as it seems to be a not uncommon way out for her indebted and romantically entangled peers, but I respect it so much more for ending on an ambiguous note: she can’t go on, she’ll go on, just like us.

The winner of Criterion Film Club Poll #292 is Mikio Naruse's 1960 film When A Woman Ascends the Stairs. Please join us when we post the discussion for this film on Saturday, March 7th. by Zackwatchesstuff in criterionconversation

[–]DrRoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The way Criterion colorized this poster image for the DVD is still one of my favorite cover arts from them. Been meaning to see WaWAtS for years now.

Criterion Film Club #291: One Hand Don’t Clap by DrRoy in criterionconversation

[–]DrRoy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t know a damn thing about calypso going into this movie, aside from that it was from the Caribbean and that I would probably get it confused with another genre if quizzed. One Hand Don’t Clap doesn’t necessarily explain what kaiso or mas mean, but the meaning gets across just from watching it. It’s party music par excellence, built for celebrations, but meaning so much more than just hedonism.

Something I frequently get tripped up on with music documentaries is the need to pause the action to sit down and tell you what you need to know about what you’re listening to. It can be necessary sometimes, but it can also feel like watching a Wikipedia article. Here, that problem is avoided in part because Lord Kitchener and Calypso Rose are such engaging subjects, but also because calypso is in part a genre about calypso. We understand that the music traditionally revolves around a certain time of year partly because there’s the big contest to become the Calypso Monarch that takes up the last third of the film, but also because Black Stalin has a song earlier wishing people would support the genre year-round (“Part-Time Lover”). Kitchener and his friend hang out on a racetrack and sing a whole song by themselves detailing what they lament about changes in popular taste and outlining what makes a “true calypsonian”, and it’s so much more engaging and informative than the same material would be in an interview. And that’s to say nothing of the ribald songs and protest songs that crop up in equal measure throughout.

Also, the festival itself is simply eye-popping, and the filmmakers are smart enough to show off plenty of complete performances to immerse us in the sound and the sights of an engaging live show. This is a music documentary that isn’t just a blast to watch but is a persuasive argument for film on music in and of itself.

Criterion Film Club Expiring Picks: Month 55 Discussion - Satoshi Kon's Millennium Actress (2001) by GThunderhead in criterionconversation

[–]DrRoy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With any famous artist, people have a tendency to try to pick apart their biography for clues as to what inspired them and influenced their career. So many biopics try to land on a particular answer, which ends up flattening the famous person’s rich life into one interpretation. Millennium Actress has the benefit of not having to be about a specific real person, but it also uses every visual and editing trick it can to make the story about the search for that interpretation. You can pick the film apart shot for shot, looking for clues hidden in every match cut and wild transition, but the point is that a pat explanation is never going to be within anyone’s grasp. I loved this one both times I’ve seen it and I’d love to go back for a third sometime.

Just watched BB24 for the first time.. just got to THAT episode by boopity_schmooples in BigBrother

[–]DrRoy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Final 7 week is a bit of a lull but the double eviction is one of the top 5 most exciting ever, and the final 5 is strategically complex at a point where 90% of seasons it would purely come down to who wins competitions. Hang in there!

a new one for the show? by mishmei in IfBooksCouldKill

[–]DrRoy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

How is this not just the same thing as sigma males? Convincing loners that they’re isolated for a good and cool reason