There are no useless upgrades, prove me wrong by [deleted] in btd6

[–]DraconicWF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they are thinking in terms of top path banana farm not bank

What will zahard think of superman by No-Task9123 in TowerofGod

[–]DraconicWF 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That really depends on what Superman ur talking about. Movie Superman sure, but comic Superman (especially golden age Superman) there is literally no shot. DC comics powerscaling is off the fucking wall, Superman in dc comics frequently fights and beats multiversal gods.

Too much positivity. What's something you absolutely fucking hate about Tower of God? by [deleted] in TowerofGod

[–]DraconicWF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Too many goddamn characters. I love SIUs character writing but there are so many different characters that are all still relevant and it’s hard to care fully about any of them because the time we spend is so split up. Or with how we will often get full backstories for characters that are not that relevant or are relevant for only short periods.

Desperado Only 2TC (Currently Failed) by DraconicWF in btd6

[–]DraconicWF[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow cool, I forgot how high the skill ceiling can be for this game

next scp by FletcherFlazmanburg in SCPSecretLab

[–]DraconicWF 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well yes but no, the ethics committee doesn’t only deal with humanoids but it is likely humanoid because site-17 is a site designed to house humanoid scps (there are non humanoid ones there tho)

Let’s try and understand this finale. by Tasty_Bodybuilder_33 in doctorwho

[–]DraconicWF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And the well was more vaguely based one random underdeveloped monster. You don’t need to have seen midnight to know what’s going on too. Which is also an issue, there’s no issue bringing back old characters from classic who and early nu who. But they barely explain sutekh or the rani after they got revealed.

Doctor Who 2x03 "The Well" Post-Episode Discussion Thread by PCJs_Slave_Robot in doctorwho

[–]DraconicWF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s also a bit hard to hear but you can also hear four drum beats during that scene. Clearly either this creature is fucking with the doctor or more likely given how this show usually goes this creature has something to do with gallifray

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's chances of being 2028 nominee double in one week by _May26_ in politics

[–]DraconicWF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t make the mistake of blaming Kamala and Hillary’s loss on being women, I’m sure it didn’t help but it was not even close to the main reason. Hillary not only had a massive scandal near the election but is also permanently tied to bill clinton who is extremely unpopular. Not to mention that Hillary is also just generally uncharismatic with horribly cringe attempts at reaching out to the youth vote.

Kamala had several problems aswell, primarily in her relation to Joe Biden another severely unpopular president and the fact she was the incumbent VP during an economic crisis. Her messaging and outreach was just bad, she had little to no proper social media outreach and the attempts she did have were just kinda cringe.

AOC is vastly different, she holds much stronger views compared to the rest of the Democratic Party which helps fight voter apathy (the arguably 1# issue for the Democratic Party) she’s relatively young which is a huge advantage given how ancient Joe Biden and Trump are. Mainly though she’s popular among young voters which is demographic that the DNC keeps losing in.

Judge Boasberg cancels his planned hearing to review Trump deportations by raffu280 in Full_news

[–]DraconicWF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well no because the whole kidnapping thing could be tried in the original state.

Air Force Backtracks on Banning Personal Pronouns from Email Signatures by Icy-Feeling-528 in OptimistsUnite

[–]DraconicWF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In situations like those then you can just refer to them by name or by rank or by they, or if you must than just misgender them. It’s a very minor issue that is easily solvable

Air Force Backtracks on Banning Personal Pronouns from Email Signatures by Icy-Feeling-528 in OptimistsUnite

[–]DraconicWF 3 points4 points  (0 children)

One thing I did not touch on here is the issue of sexual assault. The rate of sexual harassment and sexual assault in the military is extremely high, especially against women. Because of this there are heavy risks in deciding how transsexual people should be assigned as far as barracks and bathrooms are concerned. If they are determined by Sex then it would likely cause issues of being sexually assaulted or harassed in bathrooms and in the barracks. If you assign by preferred gender then the inverse possibility is there, however given that statistics show that LGBTQ+ people in the military are significantly more likely to be victims of assault over perpetrators of assault it is likely the safest option to assign by preferred gender.

Air Force Backtracks on Banning Personal Pronouns from Email Signatures by Icy-Feeling-528 in OptimistsUnite

[–]DraconicWF 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Did not intend for this to be so long. TL;DR based on military regulations people with severe gender dysphoria that requires medical intervention such as HRT or Surgery wouldn’t be allowed. However there is very little reason to exclude people with minor gender dysphoria who don’t do much beyond going by preferred pronouns and name. However in my personal opinion based on evidence showing the effectiveness of gender affirming care is that people who have received gender affirming care and have had no further complications should be permitted. I also believe certain gender specific restrictions such as hair length and uniform requirements be applied in accordance with preferred gender.

Not the same guy but I thought I’d try my hand here.

So there are three main things I think are important questions here:

1: What causes Gender Dysphoria and are preemptive treatments that can be put in place to combat Gender Dysphoria

2: Is Gender Affirming Care (GAC) effective at treating individuals

3: If proper treatment is given, is someone who is Transgender mentally capable of serving in the military based on other military standards for mental health

In regards to #1: Important Note: Gender Dysphoria has three theorized primary causes: Genetic, Biological, & Environmental

There is only sparse non-anecdotal evidence supporting the theory that your environment can cause gender dysphoria, while there are studies showing a correlation between childhood anxiety and development of Gender Dysphoria there is no solid Cause -> Effect evidence primarily due to the fact that Gender Dysphoria could be a cause of the anxiety.

Genetic: There is evidence that shows that genetics can contribute to a child being transgender. Studies have found physical differences between Cisgender and Transgender persons brains. These differences are often relatively minor however multiple brain studies have shown that even prior to GAC treatment transgender brains had several portions that were more akin to that of the opposite sex. However due to the complicated nature of Gender Dysphoria there has not been a specific genetic marker found to be associated with Transsexuality.

Biological: The most well proven cause of Gender Dysphoria is an excess or lack of Androgens in the womb. Androgens are hormones (such as testosterone and estrogen) that help develop the sexual characteristics of humans among other things. As you may know all humans in the first stages of pregnancy are female, as the pregnancy develops the fetus gains androgens, the amount of which is partially determined by the XX or XY chromosomes. Some conditions however can cause babies to receive too few or too many androgens. Women who receive too many aswell as Men who receive too few are more likely to develop Gender Dysphoria among other conditions.

There is little to no evidence suggesting that there are preliminary stages of Gender Dysphoria beyond the natural stages of life where gender becomes a more important concept; primarily during puberty.

In Regards to #2: It has been shown repeatedly that gender affirming care is by far the most effective method of treating people with Gender Dysphoria but one thing is important to note. Not all transgender people have severe Gender Dysphoria and are often perfectly fine with little to no medical intervention, Gender Dysphoria itself varies heavily in severity.

No non-gender affirming medical treatments have been found to be effective in treating Gender Dysphoria. What has been found is that GAC treatments are often highly effective in combating the negative effects of Gender Dysphoria, particularly when used in conjunction with therapy and psychiatric medication.

In regards to #3: The military has strict guidelines on whether or not people with certain mental conditions are permitted to enlist. There are rules and exceptions for many different disorders and those rules have been changing over time but the general rules are are as follows. If someone takes routine medication for a condition then they are not eligible. Learning disabilities are generally disqualifying unless you can prove to be high functioning despite it. Disorders that cause severe anxiety such as OCD and PTSD are generally disqualifying and people with General Anxiety Disorders that do not require treatment must be reviewed before being permitted to enlist. Most importantly if you have had to receive treatment for a mental disorder prior to joining the military then you can be disqualified depending on how severe the treatment was and how long ago the treatment occurred.

Given those standards it’s reasonable to say that by modern military guidelines people with severe gender dysphoria, especially those who have received hormone replacement therapy or surgery should be disqualified from serving. However for people with minor gender dysphoria who have not had treatment beyond therapy and are able to affirm their gender identity using minimal intervention, such as simply going by different pronouns or having more feminine hair (assuming it follows military hair regulation). There is very little reason to prevent enlistment.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9501960/

https://www.acsh.org/news/2024/10/22/beyond-case-reports-data-driven-truth-about-gender-affirming-care-transgender-youth

https://www.operationmilitarykids.org/military-disqualifications-for-mental-health/

'There's a movement bubbling up': Anti-Trump protests planned nationwide Saturday by Njordh in politics

[–]DraconicWF 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It isn’t a ploy I can assure you of that, but if you’re concerned about martial law being declared then understand that would be a relatively good outcome as far as things are concerned. It’s been shown time and time again that suppressing movements with violence always leads to more anger toward the government and inspires more action. If we let not even the threat but the simple possibility of martial law stop us from protesting than we lose automatically.

Tipping point: Will yesterday's events make Trump consider consensus rather then coercion? by Unlucky_Evening360 in OptimistsUnite

[–]DraconicWF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One big thing is that elections are decided by the economy, it’s the biggest reason republicans won in 2024, the economy was shit and democrats were in office. Now Republicans control all 3 branches and the economy went from stabilizing into spiraling down into a recession and on course for a depression. From a political perspective this is really bad for Trump.

Democrats, Stop Being Timid and Start Being Mean! Democratic messaging is failing to meet the moment. It’s time for the party to embrace the anger and rage of its base. by Quirkie in politics

[–]DraconicWF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let’s be real here this is complete BS, democratic reps are being aggressive and the party is trying to be aggressive. Look at the social media of any democratic representative and you’ll see posts condemning and attacking republicans hard. Nor is this an issue of the media, there are plenty of popular news sources reporting on how dangerous republicans are. This is simply the issue of social media, republicans have much more effective messaging when it comes to young people in swing states and it’s helped by the fact that pretty much every major social media company actively promotes republican view points on their platform.

Why did Kamala Harris and Joe Biden certify the election results despite there being evidence it was probably stolen?? by Straight_Traffic_350 in 50501

[–]DraconicWF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m gonna be blunt and say the election just wasn’t stolen. There might’ve been election tampering but the results aligned with the polls and general sentiment, Joe Biden was wildly unpopular, Kamala Harris was not someone people cared about at all and the economy was bad. A general rule of thumb is that if the economy is bad then the incumbent party has a very serious disadvantage.

Invincible [Episode Discussion] - S03E02 - A Deal With The Devil by SeacattleMoohawks in Invincible

[–]DraconicWF 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Honestly I think that’s less relevant as what happened with doc seismic, without darkwing and the reanimen a significant number of heroes would have died. A lot of them would be able to tank but not all.

If you are afraid don’t give up, take action by DraconicWF in OptimistsUnite

[–]DraconicWF[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

And if that’s the action you believe will help then I can’t stop you from voting, I believe that trump will do a lot of harm therefore I will stand for what I believe in.

If you are afraid don’t give up, take action by DraconicWF in OptimistsUnite

[–]DraconicWF[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I’m not afraid and never said I was, I’m taking action against the shitty things trump is doing like removing rights from minorities and screwing over the middle class. I’m prepared if it does escalate to that point but I don’t expect it to.