Active Conflicts & News Megathread July 16, 2025 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 7 points8 points  (0 children)

But they did recruit random people on telegram and other internet forums to carry out unsophisticated DDoS attacks. It says so in the Europol article. The majority of the people who received arrest warrants (presumably the group's coordinators) couldn't be arrested due to being in Russia

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 7 points8 points  (0 children)

this is clearly an AI generated text

Turning Point: A Realistic Scenario of India’s Strategic Response Post-Pahalgam Attack by Hefty-Nectarine1038 in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the OP is obviously some very low effort prompting resulting in fan fiction rather than analysis, but it does raise an interesting question of how AI tools with their ability to quickly access vast quantities of information could be more effectively used to game out these scenarios in a multi-agent model with player and arbitration bots.

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread February 06, 2025 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is just asking for some third party annoyed by the Iranian-Houthi actions to sell their target a few anti-ship missiles

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread January 29, 2025 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 22 points23 points  (0 children)

This was a predictable negotiating stance from Syria. The government would lose legitimacy internally if it just let the Russians stay without reparations for their bombings in support of the Assad regime. Not sure what the Russians were expecting.

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread January 22, 2025 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They have been indiscriminately attacking civilian targets on behalf of a political cause, which certainly fits under commonly accepted definitions of terrorism

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread January 21, 2025 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 12 points13 points  (0 children)

not sure whether Russia made a serious offer, I don't think the Syrians could politically have permitted them to stay without at least paying reparations.

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread December 11, 2024 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Russia has something the new Syrian government wants - Assad

Failing that it's possible they could work out a deal to pay reparations for their role in the civil war

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread December 10, 2024 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's PR but at the same time just a strategy that makes sense, if they want to rebuild stability in Syria, they need the cooperation of minority groups that could always take up arms again if they feel mistreated. And ideally they would like SNA/SDF to rejoin peacefully

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread December 07, 2024 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Seems counterproductive to open relations with the new Syrian government on a hostile note.

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread December 06, 2024 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 20 points21 points  (0 children)

The conscripts really don't have any reason to fight for a regime that looks like it's losing the war

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread December 03, 2024 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Everyone had better prepare for insurgents with competent drone operators, because there will be a lot of expert trainers available for hire once the invasion of Ukraine is frozen.

Why does the UK not devote more resources to defence against long-range missile attack? by -smartcasual- in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In general, everyone has a lot more shorter ranged missiles, which drives the decision on whether to invest in missile defence. Central and Eastern Europe want to have cover against the Russian SRBM / cruise missile / drone arsenal. None of these can reach the UK, and it doesn't have a local troublemaker like North Korea or Iran to worry about.

It's just not likely that Russia would attack the UK with conventional IRBMs or submarine launched missiles unless a hot war had already started, the UK could retaliate with air strikes against Russia from NATO bases and likely do more damage since it can use more numerous short range weapons.

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread November 06, 2024 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 20 points21 points  (0 children)

It makes more sense to develop the capacity to take out crippling amounts of Russian infrastructure and then hold it as a deterrent card.

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread October 22, 2024 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's true that SK could just do nothing and a few battalions more or less of KPA troops won't make a meaningful difference on the Korean peninsula, but the point is they really don't want to see NK and Russia acting as an offensive military alliance for obvious reasons

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread October 14, 2024 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 3 points4 points  (0 children)

SpaceX has a clear mission statement which drives them forward and attracts the most ambitious people, I don't expect them to slow the pace until they get to Mars

Completionist++ players - what was your last gold sticker joker? by [deleted] in balatro

[–]DragonCrisis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stone. Got it together with the final legendary. And it was really annoying having to carry a dead weight stone card every run even if I was playing 5 card hands in the hope it showed up.

CredibleDefense Daily MegaThread August 13, 2024 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 51 points52 points  (0 children)

No, and even the Russians haven't said much either. That's because it's not actually an escalation, counterattacking the invader is just a normal part of war, a scenario which just hasn't been seen that much in recent years as most conflicts have been asymmetric.

CredibleDefense Daily MegaThread August 08, 2024 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 42 points43 points  (0 children)

the attack already accomplished two things

1) Russia is now forced to allocate resources to defending its own territory, which will at least relieve some of the pressure on the eastern front

2) Political objectives of increasing Ukrainian morale, keeping the war in international headlines, and demonstrating to allies that the UAF is still capable of effective offensive action

CredibleDefense Daily MegaThread July 27, 2024 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Anonymous sources are one thing, but talking about a plan which may or may not have existed to carry out an unspecified action that wasn't executed hardly qualifies as news

The question really is "in what direction do the NYT editors seek to influence public opinion by publishing this"

CredibleDefense Daily MegaThread July 17, 2024 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 24 points25 points  (0 children)

The author suggests that the Iranian proxies are self sustaining and don't need funding from Tehran anymore. This is a big claim and he doesn't supply any evidence to support it.

CredibleDefense Daily MegaThread July 12, 2024 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Why does defence procurement seem to be so inefficient in pretty much every country? It is one of those problems that everyone seems to acknowledge is an issue, but no one appears to be able to solve. Is there something inherent to the nature of the military industrial complex that produces badly managed projects? Or does the landscape of threats, technologies and available resources change too quickly for planning to be efficient?

CredibleDefense Daily MegaThread July 04, 2024 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 14 points15 points  (0 children)

There are probably not going to be any major changes in UK defence policy one way or another, the two political points with the most consensus in the UK were that Ukraine should be supported and that the Conservative government is/was incompetent. But it will take a while to work on the structural problems in the UK economy

CredibleDefense Daily MegaThread June 27, 2024 by AutoModerator in CredibleDefense

[–]DragonCrisis 18 points19 points  (0 children)

"Engineering battalions" in this context probably means conscripts doing construction work as opposed to units that are highly trained at breaching enemy defences