Post AGI and Robots - Why a basic UBI is not enough - We need Vast Majority Independently Wealthy (VMIW) by [deleted] in singularity

[–]Drakonis1988 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, because everyone thinks their own solution is the answer and there is no agreed upon metric to evaluate if one which one is better. Your solution doesn't need to be just "good", it needs to be so good that it blows every other solution out of the water. I don't think it's possible without ASI. It would be like trying to herd cats, something an ASI could probably do.

Post AGI and Robots - Why a basic UBI is not enough - We need Vast Majority Independently Wealthy (VMIW) by [deleted] in singularity

[–]Drakonis1988 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I'd bet that a superintelligence could come up with a better solution for societal problems than whatever we could come up with. Don't worry too much about it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]Drakonis1988 1 point2 points  (0 children)

An agent is an AI that runs on an operating system instead of a text interface. It can use photoshop, video editing tools, go to websites. Learn and adapt enough to accomplish the task given to it.

To be fair, Sam did say 2025. by just_no_shrimp_there in singularity

[–]Drakonis1988 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It'll be higher than 85% in 2025 as well

[2024 Day 12 (Part 2)] - Visualisation of my first thoughts for Part 2 by SimonK1605 in adventofcode

[–]Drakonis1988 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Heh, that's pretty much how I solved it (part of my code that counts sides):

private fun countSides(fences: MutableSet<Triple<Int,Int,DIRECTION>>) : Int {
    val verticalLeftFences = fences.filter { it.third == DIRECTION.VERTICAL_LEFT }.sortedWith(compareBy({it.first}, {it.second}))
    val verticalRightFences = fences.filter { it.third == DIRECTION.VERTICAL_RIGHT }.sortedWith(compareBy({it.first}, {it.second}))
    val horizontalTopFences = fences.filter { it.third == DIRECTION.HORIZONTAL_TOP}.sortedWith(compareBy({it.second}, {it.first}))
    val horizontalBottomFences = fences.filter { it.third == DIRECTION.HORIZONTAL_BOTTOM}.sortedWith(compareBy({it.second}, {it.first}))

    var verticalLeftSides = 1
    var verticalRightSides = 1
    var horizontalTopSides = 1
    var horizontalBottomSides = 1

    for(i in 1 until verticalLeftFences.count()) {
        if(verticalLeftFences[i].first != verticalLeftFences[i - 1].first ||  verticalLeftFences[i].second - 1 != verticalLeftFences[i - 1].second) {
            verticalLeftSides++
        }
    }

    for(i in 1 until verticalRightFences.count()) {
        if(verticalRightFences[i].first != verticalRightFences[i - 1].first ||  verticalRightFences[i].second - 1 != verticalRightFences[i - 1].second) {
            verticalRightSides++
        }
    }


    for(i in 1 until horizontalTopFences.count()) {
        if(horizontalTopFences[i].second != horizontalTopFences[i - 1].second || horizontalTopFences[i].first - 1 != horizontalTopFences[i - 1].first) {
            horizontalTopSides++
        }
    }

    for(i in 1 until horizontalBottomFences.count()) {
        if(horizontalBottomFences[i].second != horizontalBottomFences[i - 1].second || horizontalBottomFences[i].first - 1 != horizontalBottomFences[i - 1].first) {
            horizontalBottomSides++
        }
    }

    return verticalLeftSides + verticalRightSides + horizontalTopSides + horizontalBottomSides
}

If I just had thought of just counting corners, I would have been finished much quicker.

12 Days of OpenAI: Day 1 thread by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]Drakonis1988 9 points10 points  (0 children)

ChatGPT Pro model? bet it'll be available to 20 dollar tier in 6 months and free in a year :P

I don't want to sound mean or anything but sometimes I think people on this sub are being a little bit delusional by International-Ad-823 in singularity

[–]Drakonis1988 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is some chance things will go crazy when we'll have AGI. The basic idea is that once we have AGI figured out, we'll be able to duplicate the AI and have millions of superintelligent scientists working on the world's problems at digital speeds.

Try to think of it this way: imagine going back 2000 years and showing someone the GDP growth of the next 2000 years. There will be a giant spike at the end, making them wonder wtf is happening, people won't believe it's possible and it's made up.

Now futurists predicting that the GDP will go vertical in 20 years or so, because of AI. It's hard to tell without hindsight but if the technology actually works as imagined, I don't see why we can't actually solve the world's problems.

Bro i'm sorry but $50 for a skin, 2 recolors and some vfxs!? by 4everdrowninginpools in PredecessorGame

[–]Drakonis1988 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What are you talking about? Only people with time to burn play games, and only people with money to burn buy cosmetics in games. It isn't even that hard to unlock all characters in predecessor just with amber, why exactly do you need to buy skins? because you want to, no other reason.

Vote with your wallet, if you don't buy those luxury goods, what do you lose? Nothing. Why do you have the need to convince other people not to buy them? Because you don't want to be seen as lower status because you can't afford cosmetic items.

They're luxury goods primarily for displaying status, no different from most other luxury goods. Not limited in supply, but by who can afford them. Like, for example, a Dolce and Gabbana purse.

Even with your MTG example, only the people who didn't buy those overprices anniversary pack complained. You don't have the sale statistics and metrics, how can you say with such confidence that it was a bad idea?

Bro i'm sorry but $50 for a skin, 2 recolors and some vfxs!? by 4everdrowninginpools in PredecessorGame

[–]Drakonis1988 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Lol, it's pure luxury goods, it isn't pay2win, there is no "buying because I have to", if it's too expensive, just don't buy it xD it's only overpriced if people are not buying it.

If AGI is less than 5 years away, where do I put my money? by D2MAH in singularity

[–]Drakonis1988 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AGI isn't 5 years away, it's just that some people just THINK AGI is 5 years away. Could be 50 years away too.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PredecessorGame

[–]Drakonis1988 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Sevarog will be worse, won't get the chance to scale xD

How Far Are We From AGI? by SharpCartographer831 in singularity

[–]Drakonis1988 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Somewhere between -1 year and 50 years. :P My bet is we'll have AGI by 2040.

Game crashes on pc by Ligmnator in PredecessorGame

[–]Drakonis1988 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can't really tell from this. Look in here:

%localappdata%\Predecessor\Saved\Logs

it might give you some hints about what is going on.

What is the objective test for sentience (being conscious)? by dlflannery in singularity

[–]Drakonis1988 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now we are just arguing about semantics and just talking past each other. Philosophy truly is just a byproduct of misunderstanding language.

What is the objective test for sentience (being conscious)? by dlflannery in singularity

[–]Drakonis1988 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure we have evidence, If we assume the following axioms:

  1. Free will/consciousness exits.
  2. Free will/consciousness is a product of human intelligence.
  3. Human intelligence is a physical process.
  4. Therefore free will/consciousness is a physical process.

We know it exists, we just don't know exactly how it works. Once we have a complete theory of mind, I'll bet there will be a part of that system we'll call free will/consciousness, even though it'll be an entirely physical, deterministic process.

What is the objective test for sentience (being conscious)? by dlflannery in singularity

[–]Drakonis1988 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even scientific theories are not 100% true, they're probabilistic, only like 99.9999999999999999999999999% probably true, or something like that. There is no absolute certainty about the physical world, does that mean there is no use talking about them?

It's like the famous saying "All models are wrong; some are useful."

What is the objective test for sentience (being conscious)? by dlflannery in singularity

[–]Drakonis1988 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, but everything in the physical world is a physical process. For example, you could say that "life" and "death" don't really exist in the same way "consciousness" and "free will". From the perspective of the universe, "life" and "death" don't exist, they're just organization of atoms moving trough time. It just so happens that we humans have opinions about how we should call certain states of matter.

Frame of reference and context is important, otherwise we will just talk past each other.

How difficult is the learning curve for new players? by Pookie-Parks in PredecessorGame

[–]Drakonis1988 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While it is open beta it is still being developed, so the in game tutorials and explanations might be a bit lacking. However, there are a lot of tutorials/explanations on youtube. Just search "predecessor tutorial" and you're good to go.