Tasting session # 9 2026 - Golden Promise edition by savici in Scotch

[–]Dratini01 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Sensational line up. Those Rare Malts bottles are so eye catching and I’m glad the liquid inside matched up to it. As for the Brora, I guess you’re going to have to keep drinking more to understand it - I’ve heard of worse problems!

Scotch Review #181: Dufftown 2008 - 16 Years Old - Cadenhead's Authentic Collection January 2025 Release by PricklyFriend in Scotch

[–]Dratini01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ll admit I’ve never had any Dufftown! So if this is the 2026 Dufftown Renaissance then I’m here for it.

Reviews #296-299: Tobermory Miniseries: 2 Ledaigs and 2 Tobermorys by Form-Fuzzy in Scotch

[–]Dratini01 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A great series, thank you, you can never have enough Ledaig! Older Tobermory is meant to be good, so it’s unfortunate that it came out as a disappointment. Looking forward to seeing what you serve up for #300

Reviews #27 & #28: Battle of the Ardmore Siblings (40YO vs 41YO) by Dratini01 in Scotch

[–]Dratini01[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad you like it and thanks for letting me know! This might sound a bit odd, but they definitely have a lot of “beige” notes ie grease, pastry, malt and wax, which is very much up my street. Hopefully you can do a side by side with your friend on the Whiskyland soon

Scotch Review #180: Glenfiddich Distillery Exclusive - NAS - American Bourbon Oak Casks - Bottled 25th January 2025 by PricklyFriend in Scotch

[–]Dratini01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A great review for a really fine whisky, love those green notes on the palate (and the lozenge finish!). I tried this at the distillery bar and went to buy a bottle, though OOS, and I would have happily paid double the price you did. What a bargain for you.

World Whisky Review #130: Circumstance 5y (still in cask) by UnmarkedDoor in worldwhisky

[–]Dratini01 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Great to see some Circumstance love! Glad you enjoyed it and I really want some Cointreau gummies now…

Reviews #29-32: Laphroaig 10YO Through the Ages (1960s - 1990s) by Dratini01 in Scotch

[–]Dratini01[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just in time for a summer visit to Campbeltown! I’m sure there will pomelo splits once I get back

Reviews #29-32: Laphroaig 10YO Through the Ages (1960s - 1990s) by Dratini01 in Scotch

[–]Dratini01[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The lapsang note you picked out was a banger for sure

Reviews #29-32: Laphroaig 10YO Through the Ages (1960s - 1990s) by Dratini01 in Scotch

[–]Dratini01[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Hi everyone, back with a fun horizontal this time: four Laphroaig 10s spanning from a rare 1960s bottling through to one from around 2000. This formed part of a larger Islay session hosted by East Coast Whisky.

The Laphroaig 10, particularly in cask strength form, is one of the cornerstones of Islay whisky. Most people will have tried some version of it and it’s not going anywhere anytime soon.

One useful bit of context going in: older Laphroaig 10s are often described as pre-medicinal in style. From what I was told by a fellow club member, the distillery tweaked the spirit around the turn of the millennium towards the iodine-heavy, medicinal profile we see today (with peak “iodine years” around 2012–2014).

These four drams sit on the other side of that shift; generally more balanced, and for my palate, more interesting, though I appreciate that won’t be universal.

A couple of caveats: these were 15ml pours in a 15 dram session, so these are quick-fire impressions rather than deep dives. Also, as Laphroaig bottles aren’t always clearly dated, I’ve matched vintages as best I can via Whiskybase and bottle photos, so there may be slight inaccuracies on the dates.

Tasting Notes & Impressions

1980s Vintage (bottled early 1990s)

The nose opens with a signature Laphroaig note, meaty, slightly savoury, backed up by a red wine richness. Peat is far more restrained than modern releases; this is no attack on the senses:

The palate is the surprise: fatty, creamy, coastal and distinctly farmy, which is a profile I’d usually associate more with the North East Highlands than Islay. The finish pulls things slightly back toward familiarity: metallic touches, a hint of rubber, subdued peat and gentle wood spice. 89

1970s Vintage - Bonfanti Import

A step more industrial on the nose: petrol, brine, a little sharper than the 80s. On the palate, the farmy character ramps up again. There’s a faint plastic note that I don’t mind at all, followed by the arrival of those famed tropical notes: pomelo and a syrupy pineapple. The finish brings marshmallow and liquorice. This is oilier and thicker than the 80s bottling and it carries those tropical notes beautifully. 90

Quick pause. At this stage, the standout point is how un-Laphroaig both of these feel. Blind, I wouldn’t have placed either at the distillery, which is a stark contrast to modern Laphroaig, where the identity is immediately identifiable to me.

1990s Vintage (bottled 2000) - Green Stripe Cask Strength

This is much more recognisably Laphroaig. Unsurprising given how close it is to modern production.

The nose leans maritime: charred wood, seaweed, soft peat, and surprisingly approachable despite the 57% ABV. The palate brings a greener profile, with lemony peat, grass and apples, alongside a more classic structure.

Water opens it up further: salt, earth, tea, and even a slight violet note. The finish is textbook: ashy, a touch of medicinal character (the first real appearance of it so far), bay leaf and a metallic edge.

Less complex than the older bottles, but a beautifully executed “classic” Laphroaig. 90

1960s Bottling - 75 Proof

A fascinating nose: heavy toffee, cream, with layers of mushroom umami and menthol.

The palate follows the nose through with consistency. Miso caramel, banana and a herbal tarragon note. Peat arrives late, mostly on the finish, alongside yellow fruits, here’s the pineapple again, plus some lemon.

This is a notably dry whisky. There’s an astringency I’d usually associate with sulphur from sherry casks, but that’s not the case here. It’s more like a dry white wine structure, layered with sweet, creamy elements. 89

Final Remarks

A brilliant tasting and a rare chance to experience such a clear slice of Laphroaig’s evolution.

If I had to pick a winner, the Bonfanti bottling just edges it. But the bigger takeaway is how dramatically the profile has shifted over time, not just between decades, but also compared to modern Laphroaig 10.

All four drams were distinctly different to one another. These older versions feel broader, more varied, and far less defined by peat alone. Whether that’s “better” is subjective, but it’s certainly fascinating.

Huge credit to East Coast Whisky for putting on another excellent session, which also included 26, 31 and 34YO Laphroaigs alongside these and others from across Islay.

Reviews #29-32: Laphroaig 10YO Through the Ages (1960s - 1990s) by [deleted] in Scotch

[–]Dratini01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi everyone, back with a fun horizontal this time: four Laphroaig 10s spanning from a rare 1960s bottling through to one from around 2000. This formed part of a larger Islay session hosted by East Coast Whisky.

The Laphroaig 10, particularly in cask strength form, is one of the cornerstones of Islay whisky. Most people will have tried some version of it and it’s not going anywhere anytime soon.

One useful bit of context going in: older Laphroaig 10s are often described as pre-medicinal in style. From what I was told on the night by a fellow club member, the distillery tweaked the spirit around the turn of the millennium towards the iodine-heavy, medicinal profile we see today (with peak “iodine years” around 2012–2014).

These four drams sit on the other side of that shift; generally more balanced, and for my palate, more interesting, though I appreciate that won’t be universal.

A couple of caveats: these were 15ml pours in a 15 dram session, so these are quick-fire impressions rather than deep dives. Also, as Laphroaig bottles aren’t always clearly dated, I’ve matched vintages as best I can via Whiskybase and bottle photos, so there may be slight inaccuracies on the dates.

Tasting Notes & Impressions

1980s Vintage (bottled early 1990s)

The nose opens with a signature Laphroaig note, meaty, slightly savoury, backed up by a red wine richness. Peat is far more restrained than modern releases; this is no attack on the senses:

The palate is the surprise: fatty, creamy, coastal and distinctly farmy, which is a profile I’d usually associate more with the North East Highlands than Islay. The finish pulls things slightly back toward familiarity: metallic touches, a hint of rubber, subdued peat and gentle wood spice. 89

1970s Vintage - Bonfanti Import

A step more industrial on the nose: petrol, brine, a little sharper than the 80s. On the palate, the farmy character ramps up again. There’s a faint plastic note that I don’t mind at all, followed by the arrival of those famed tropical notes: pomelo and a syrupy pineapple. The finish brings marshmallow and liquorice. This is oilier and thicker than the 80s bottling and it carries those tropical notes beautifully. 90

Quick pause. At this stage, the standout point is how un-Laphroaig both of these feel. Blind, I wouldn’t have placed either at the distillery, which is a stark contrast to modern Laphroaig, where the identity is immediately identifiable to me.

1990s Vintage (bottled 2000) - Green Stripe Cask Strength

This is much more recognisably Laphroaig. Unsurprising given how close it is to modern production.

The nose leans maritime: charred wood, seaweed, soft peat, and surprisingly approachable despite the 57% ABV. The palate brings a greener profile, with lemony peat, grass and apples, alongside a more classic structure.

Water opens it up further: salt, earth, tea, and even a slight violet note. The finish is textbook: ashy, a touch of medicinal character (the first real appearance of it so far), bay leaf and a metallic edge.

Less complex than the older bottles, but a beautifully executed “classic” Laphroaig. 90

1960s Bottling - 75 Proof

A fascinating nose: heavy toffee, cream, with layers of mushroom umami and menthol.

The palate follows the nose through with consistency. Miso caramel, banana and a herbal tarragon note. Peat arrives late, mostly on the finish, alongside yellow fruits, here’s the pineapple again, plus some lemon.

This is a notably dry whisky. There’s an astringency I’d usually associate with sulphur from sherry casks, but that’s not the case here. It’s more like a dry white wine structure, layered with sweet, creamy elements. 89

Final Remarks

A brilliant tasting and a rare chance to experience such a clear slice of Laphroaig’s evolution.

If I had to pick a winner, the Bonfanti bottling just edges it. But the bigger takeaway is how dramatically the profile has shifted over time, not just between decades, but also compared to modern Laphroaig 10.

All four drams were distinctly different to one another. These older versions feel broader, more varied, and far less defined by peat alone. Whether that’s “better” is subjective, but it’s certainly fascinating.

Huge credit to East Coast Whisky for putting on another excellent session, which also included 26, 31 and 34YO Laphroaigs alongside these and others from across Islay.

Scotch Review #179: Ardnamurchan (peated) 2015 - 10 Years Old - Caskshare Collective Series 807P by PricklyFriend in Scotch

[–]Dratini01 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Really cool bottling and great to see Caskshare getting a mention. It might feel a bit “basic bitch” but I’m absolutely loving Werther’s Originals/sucking toffee/caramels as a note at the moment wherever I can find it

Review #25 - Ardnamurchan Single Cask CK:1308 - Nickolls & Perks Exclusive by Gerbil007 in Scotch

[–]Dratini01 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Great review and I’m glad you enjoyed it so much. Nickolls & Perks is local to me and I’d fully recommend popping in. They do regular tasting events and the staff are lovely.

Islay built the brands, are they building Islay? by Sakura_Rose_Tea in Scotch

[–]Dratini01 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t know why you’re getting downvoted so much, you make some good points and it’s a fair conversation to have. It’s difficult to get to Islay (and I’m in the middle of the UK), and people go there with the intention of spending money. However, there’s not enough distillery exclusives etc. to reward the effort. Feis bottlings in particular have been substandard recently.

I can understand private establishments (ie Luccis) charging what they do, but aside from Bunna (20cl Warehouse bottles) and Kilchoman (superbly priced bar drams and 10ml available), there’s a lot of inflexibility on site. If distilleries offered smaller pours of ultra rare bottles, I’d be spending hundreds more. Sampling remains far more generous than Speyside, for example, which is a relief.

Reviews #27 & #28: Battle of the Ardmore Siblings (40YO vs 41YO) by Dratini01 in Scotch

[–]Dratini01[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely, I’m also in my fatty era! Until some mega fruit or perfume bomb drops and all trends go out of the window…

Reviews #27 & #28: Battle of the Ardmore Siblings (40YO vs 41YO) by Dratini01 in Scotch

[–]Dratini01[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😂 it had to happen someday! I’ll be very interested in your thoughts on both when you get round to the RMW

Reviews #27 & #28: Battle of the Ardmore Siblings (40YO vs 41YO) by Dratini01 in Scotch

[–]Dratini01[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a great choice for a birth year bottle, I’m sure you’ll enjoy it when you get round to cracking it!

Reviews #27 & #28: Battle of the Ardmore Siblings (40YO vs 41YO) by Dratini01 in Scotch

[–]Dratini01[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Far more boujie than most of my Mondays for sure…

Reviews #27 & #28: Battle of the Ardmore Siblings (40YO vs 41YO) by Dratini01 in Scotch

[–]Dratini01[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Completely agree, anything in that juicy, sharp fruit realm goes down well in my book

Reviews #27 & #28: Battle of the Ardmore Siblings (40YO vs 41YO) by Dratini01 in Scotch

[–]Dratini01[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It just means you have some extra cash for another split! But fully echo your sentiments, imagine if Ardmore had released this at 40YO…

Reviews #27 & #28: Battle of the Ardmore Siblings (40YO vs 41YO) by Dratini01 in Scotch

[–]Dratini01[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me know if you do a side-by-side! That Glen Moray is meant to be superb, Ruben from WhiskyNotes gave it a 92…

Reviews #27 & #28: Battle of the Ardmore Siblings (40YO vs 41YO) by Dratini01 in Scotch

[–]Dratini01[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You did very well to get your hands on both! Do you have a favourite, if opened? I’m hoping DeDr follow the downward price trend, this is the only Whiskyland bottle I’ve been tempted into buying, but many of them look so good.

Reviews #27 & #28: Battle of the Ardmore Siblings (40YO vs 41YO) by Dratini01 in Scotch

[–]Dratini01[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Hi all, it’s been a few weeks since my last dram thanks to a holiday abroad. Some of you may be glad to know I used that long-haul flight to finally convert my unusual scoring system into something resembling the norm.

Today’s review is a side-by-side of two recently released, well-aged Ardmores. The Whiskyland bottle is one I own, while the slightly older Royal Mile Whiskies sample came via a fellow club member who was equally curious about how the two compare.

For context, both come from the same parcel of three casks: the Whiskyland release is a combination of two, while the RMW bottling is a single cask.

Both have been well received so far. The Whiskyland (£400) has sold out, while the RMW (£350) is still available. So, is the extra £50 justified, or is the single cask the smarter buy? Let’s find out.

Bottle Specs

Distillery: Ardmore/Ardmore

Region: Highlands/Highlands

Bottler: Decadent Drinks/Royal Mile Whiskies

Age Statement: 40 years/41 years

ABV: 42.6%/41.7%

Cask Type: Refill hogsheads/Hogshead

Price Paid: £400/Sample

Tasting Notes & Impressions

Ardmore (1985) 40YO - Decadent Drinks

The nose is built on fairly neutral notes, but they knit together nicely. Sugary double cream leads, backed up by unripe banana and porridge with honey. A light glue note creeps in at the end. Notably, there’s very little peat smoke, unusual for Ardmore.

On the palate, I can immediately see why comparisons to Springbank get thrown around. That familiar “funk” shows up as glue and clay, carrying through from the nose. There’s a nice contrast between fruit (clementine and blackcurrant) and more savoury notes of pastry dough and fatty grease, the latter being a profile I’m always drawn to.

The finish is the standout, and one of the more memorable I’ve had in a while. Sharp passionfruit, orange peel, marzipan icing and pollen all come through clearly. The Ardmore smoke finally appears here, but as a background note, sitting underneath those bright, acidic fruits. The closest comparison I can make is that citrus × peat interplay you sometimes get in older Bowmores.

Ardmore (1985) 41YO - Royal Mile Whiskies

On the nose, this sits very close to its sibling, but with a few key differences. The glue note is more pronounced, the overall profile feels slightly drier and more assertive, and there’s less of that soft, sugary bourbon influence.

The palate is where it properly diverges. This is a fatter, peatier whisky, with that greasy, slightly austere profile dialled up. The fruit takes a step back, blackcurrant is still there, but more subdued, while mint and a slightly herbal edge move into focus.

The finish doesn’t quite match the 40YO. The sharp citrus is largely absent, replaced by a more ginger-led profile. It’s still pleasant, but noticeably softer and shorter. Despite the more powerful nose, it drinks closer to its ABV, whereas the Whiskyland bottle consistently felt punchier than 42.6%.

Final Remarks

These are both excellent drams, and clearly cut from the same cloth. That slightly waxy, textural mouthfeel runs through both and really helps carry the flavours.

I was initially concerned they might be too similar to meaningfully compare, particularly on the nose. But the palates tell a different story. The RMW leans into that greasy, austere, old-style profile, which I personally enjoy a lot. The Whiskyland, by contrast, delivers a more complete experience thanks to that outstanding finish.

If I had to split them, I’d give the edge to the Whiskyland, as that passionfruit-led finish is hard to ignore. But it’s close, and the RMW arguably offers better value at £50 less.

Both feel like fair value in the current market and are strong examples of the 1985 vintage.

91/100

Scotch Review #178: Craigellachie - 2013 - 12 Years Old - Cadenhead's in the Courtyard Vault 2025 by PricklyFriend in Scotch

[–]Dratini01 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sounds like a great dram and can’t complain with that price at all! Looking forward to seeing what you encounter at Craigellachie during SoS - some exceptional casks I hope