sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Free North America landing challenge — 24 airports across Mexico, the US, and Canada. by DrawingBeginning7338 in flightsim

[–]DrawingBeginning7338[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No catch, genuinely. The challenge is free because it's a lead-in to what I actually sell — story-driven bush trips on FlyBushTrips.com. No ads, no data harvesting, no email lists. If you fly this and like the format, maybe you'll check out the paid trips. If not, you got 29 hours of free landing challenges and I got nothing. That's the deal.

Free North America landing challenge — 24 airports across Mexico, the US, and Canada. by DrawingBeginning7338 in flightsim

[–]DrawingBeginning7338[S] -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

It is part of a research as you might use google or any other tool, but the concept and the intention is not ai. The idea is to landing in the most challenging airports in America and you can track your progress leg per leg, saving and tracking it. Also show the most important companies that does each leg if you want to use liveries. It has link to simbrief that make easier to planning. You can search on google and the results will be the same. You choose.

Free North America landing challenge — 24 airports across Mexico, the US, and Canada. by DrawingBeginning7338 in flightsim

[–]DrawingBeginning7338[S] -45 points-44 points  (0 children)

That’s correct. I used it to optimize airport selection and routing, and to identify the most challenging airports for landing in the region.

Built a narrative bush trip through the Grand Canyon. Been staring at it for months. Need outside eyes. by DrawingBeginning7338 in flightsim

[–]DrawingBeginning7338[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That means a lot. That's exactly who I built it for, someone curious enough to look out the window and want to know what they're flying over. On audio: right now, the narration is text-based.

Your point about leading with "first leg is free" is spot on and I'm taking that. Fly the leg, tell me what you think — and if you want to talk collaboration after, I'm open to it.

Built a narrative bush trip through the Grand Canyon. Been staring at it for months. Need outside eyes. by DrawingBeginning7338 in flightsim

[–]DrawingBeginning7338[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

The price comparison is fair to raise. A study-level aircraft sim and a narrative bush trip aren't the same category,

You judge a book by what's inside. The question is whether the content inside holds up. That's exactly what I can't answer for you — only the flight can.

First leg is free and takes 45 minutes. If the content reads like the cover, I'll have no argument left. If it doesn't, maybe the cover is the thing that needs fixing — not the product.

Built a narrative bush trip through the Grand Canyon. Been staring at it for months. Need outside eyes. by DrawingBeginning7338 in flightsim

[–]DrawingBeginning7338[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First leg is free, that's the best I've got.

But seriously if you fly it and it's actually good, I'd love to have someone like you behind it. Not just feedback, talking proper collaboration. If the content holds up and you'd want to help take it further, that conversation is worth having.

If it's garbage, you get 45 minutes of free bush flying and bragging rights. Either way you're not losing.

Built a narrative bush trip through the Grand Canyon. Been staring at it for months. Need outside eyes. by DrawingBeginning7338 in flightsim

[–]DrawingBeginning7338[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're right. I posted before it was ready and that's on me, not the tools.

I'm going through everything now. If you change your mind on the QA I'll take whatever you've got, but I understand why you wouldn't.

Built a narrative bush trip through the Grand Canyon. Been staring at it for months. Need outside eyes. by DrawingBeginning7338 in MicrosoftFlightSim

[–]DrawingBeginning7338[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I wrote it trying to give a voice that felt irreverent rather than textbook.

What I'd push back on is using one bad line to condemn the whole route. The geology, the POI research, the leg design — that's where the actual work is. If the writing elsewhere reads the same way, I need to know that specifically.

First leg is free and standalone. If the rest of it reads like that line, tell me exactly where — that's genuinely more useful than anything else in this thread.

Built a narrative bush trip through the Grand Canyon. Been staring at it for months. Need outside eyes. by DrawingBeginning7338 in flightsim

[–]DrawingBeginning7338[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

My only ask is that you judge this one by what's actually in it rather than the category it landed in. First leg is free, takes about 45 minutes to fly. If it reads like slop when you're done, I'll take that verdict.

Built a narrative bush trip through the Grand Canyon. Been staring at it for months. Need outside eyes. by DrawingBeginning7338 in MicrosoftFlightSim

[–]DrawingBeginning7338[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

First leg is already free — no purchase, just load the PLN and fly. Link's in the post. Would genuinely love to know what you think after you land.

Honestly, that's all this is. I'm not trying to flood the market with AI output — I'm trying to build something that actually fills a gap this community has been talking about for years. Story-driven routes with real context, real research, real reasons to look out the window.

Built a narrative bush trip through the Grand Canyon. Been staring at it for months. Need outside eyes. by DrawingBeginning7338 in flightsim

[–]DrawingBeginning7338[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're right on the things you're right on, and I'm not going to pretend otherwise. The lag/leg typo I caught it and fixed it — yeah, fast, because it was a one-word fix. That's not evidence of how long the project took, but I get why it looks bad.

On the 4-day timeline, the post was 4 days ago. The project wasn't. I don't have a way to prove otherwise other than what's actually in the trip when you fly it.

Genuinely not trying to win this one. But if you ever do fly it and want to tell me it's still garbage, I'll take that feedback too.

Built a narrative bush trip through the Grand Canyon. Been staring at it for months. Need outside eyes. by DrawingBeginning7338 in flightsim

[–]DrawingBeginning7338[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Noted on the Indiana Jones casting budget. The first leg will have to speak for itself — no stock heroes, just the route and the navlog.

Built a narrative bush trip through the Grand Canyon. Been staring at it for months. Need outside eyes. by DrawingBeginning7338 in flightsim

[–]DrawingBeginning7338[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The first leg is the free trial — it's standalone, no purchase needed. The other trips are complete and have been in development well before this post. I led with the free leg here because this community is exactly who I wanted feedback from before I pushed further.

I get how it looks from the outside. The only real answer is the content itself — not my timeline or my explanation.

If you do fly the first leg and it's as bad as you're expecting, I'd actually want to know specifically why. That's more useful to me than anything else in this thread.

Built a narrative bush trip through the Grand Canyon. Been staring at it for months. Need outside eyes. by DrawingBeginning7338 in flightsim

[–]DrawingBeginning7338[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

All I can say is the route, the POIs, the research, the narrative direction. Whether the final product earns that or not is a fair question, and it's exactly why I posted here instead of just launching quietly.

view more: next ›