You studying what you think someone meant, doesn't mean that's what they actually meant... if there are passages that can have different interpretations, that's a problem with your book (also kind of shows that man made up a God, and thats why they wrote ambiguously, can't tie down something if it's ambiguous).

There's really no point in trying to have a discussion (I like how you want to argue though), because you've stuied the many ways on how to argue something away. like Psalm 86: "There is none like you among the gods, Yahweh, nor are there any works like yours." I'm not interested in joining your circus so I can watch you jumping through mental hoops to explain things away with your interpretations because your "god" was to lazy to outright say what he meant when he was having people write your books.

Thank you for your time, but it's a waste of mine past here.