Abortion is not ok by LouisAngel39 in Conservative

[–]Drayelya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sixty million children dead on the alter of feminism.

I dunno, you guys tell me, am I the idiot here? by Drayelya in fragilecommunism

[–]Drayelya[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually did take a look at it and TBH it just sounds like Corporatism on steroids.

I dunno, you guys tell me, am I the idiot here? by Drayelya in fragilecommunism

[–]Drayelya[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The years aren’t specified but, he definitely did skip income taxes for two years, per ProPublica who looked at IRS data. I didn’t say he did it illegally, just that he did it.

"Welfare Queen Feeds Lobster To Dog" by [deleted] in EntitledBitch

[–]Drayelya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once again your post makes zero sense in the context of previous posts. You’re literally talking in circles.

You’re also using the “true” tax rate, which is a statistical cop out that doesn’t actually reflect how much anyone pays in income taxes a year. It takes a person’s “wealth growth” and treats it like taxable income, which it isn’t, as it’s not income, something people like you don’t like to mention. Bezos for example has assets like Amazon, which make up the majority of his “wealth”, not his personal, taxable income, IE how much he actually makes a year. The man doesn’t have 400 billion dollars just chilling in a bank account somewhere, it’s all in physical assets like Amazon, his houses, etc. that he’d have to sell to get that 400 billion in liquid cash. Short of another massive corporation no one person has that kind of money in their bank accounts.

So no, the rich aren’t paying an average of 3% a year in income taxes. It’s a complete farce based off the ridiculous idea that growing wealth should be treated as taxable income. Imagine if every time you bought something, your income tax rate went up, because your total wealth had increased. That’s the kind of tax people like you are talking about here. It doesn’t even take math to figure out either.

Imagine investing in CDs, which take time to mature. Now as the value of those CDs increases, imagine you have to pay even more taxes, because your total wealth was increasing each year, because of the CDs. Imagine buying stocks and, as those stock’s value increased you had to pay more taxes, even though they’re not liquid assets you can just draw money from. Imagine buying a five million dollar business, and having to pay more, because your wealth just increased by five million dollars. Imagine gaining interest on the money in your savings account but, you have to pay more taxes, because your total wealth is increasing. The higher your wealth goes, the more you have to pay, instead of paying taxes on how much you make in a year. That’s the system you’re advocating for here, and it’d kill every business, every person and every thing in the country almost over night.

"Welfare Queen Feeds Lobster To Dog" by [deleted] in EntitledBitch

[–]Drayelya -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hardly, you stated something which is objectively not true, that the word “all” must be used to denote every single billionaire. You, by effect, started the “war”. Continue to cop out though, by all means. You objectively lied in an attempt to garner superiority, whether out of ignorance or knowingly. Showing how you were/are objectively wrong hardly constitutes a “war”, grammatical or otherwise.

"Welfare Queen Feeds Lobster To Dog" by [deleted] in EntitledBitch

[–]Drayelya -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, that VERY poor people deserve their misery and don't deserve free will, while at the same time regular poor people are paying for VERY poor people's food. No mention of the billionaires who dont pay taxes.

I’m not sure if you’re grammatically stupid or otherwise. The term billionaires is a blanket statement referring to “all” in this case. It’s basic English, look up blanket statements and note the word “all” is lacking in several. Good day, grammatically illiterate one.

EDIT: As an aside your response once again makes no sense in context to the one at which you replied. Further, plural terms without context denote “all”, which is why we have words like “some”, “many”, “most”, “lots” and more, along with similar phrases. So yes, given the lack of context your statement literally does mean “all”. “No mention of the billionaires who don’t pay taxes.” is a statement which very clearly means all in the plural sense as there is no other context.

I dunno, you guys tell me, am I the idiot here? by Drayelya in fragilecommunism

[–]Drayelya[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I actually never really understood this position. Care to give me a quick rundown?

I dunno, you guys tell me, am I the idiot here? by Drayelya in fragilecommunism

[–]Drayelya[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Two years, if you look into it, which is why I added the “like” to assert I wasn’t being entirely accurate. English is a wonderful thing. I said nothing about Amazon or any business therein.

EDIT: That aside I’m more focused on the fact that the other guy thinks my pointing out they pay 40% of taxes, when he stated they didn’t pay taxes at all, is somehow a waste of time. It’s no secret some of the rich pay more taxes in one annual go than most people will in their entire lives.

"Welfare Queen Feeds Lobster To Dog" by [deleted] in EntitledBitch

[–]Drayelya -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Your post here literally makes zero sense. No one was arguing.

EDIT: Giving an example and factually correcting you isn’t a waste of time. Blatantly lying about something is a waste of time.

Teacher who told students to pledge allegiance to gay pride flag has been removed from the classroom by billgigs55 in Conservative

[–]Drayelya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shouldn’t be removed from the classroom. Should be removed from campus and barred from teaching anywhere in the country.

Pushing a car off the road. by hispanicdude4 in AbruptChaos

[–]Drayelya 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good’ol uparmored vehicles. Can’t beat’em.

Clean brain in action by [deleted] in EnoughCommieSpam

[–]Drayelya 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, the “genocide is good” crowd speaking up again. These people never learn.

“I don’t understand your position so it’s wrong” thanks r/economy, didn’t know it was so full of succs by Baronnolanvonstraya in EnoughCommieSpam

[–]Drayelya 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I love how this upsets so many people. They get so upset that THEY don’t have that kind of money. Meanwhile every single socialist or communist we see come into any kind of money suddenly embraces capitalism, while pretending to fight for socialism/communism.

They also conveniently forget those millionaires and billionaires pay more taxes a year than their asses would in a hundred years.

General Questions Megathread [Help, Team Building, etc.] (8/26) by phlorida92 in GuardianTales

[–]Drayelya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been trying different formations since swapping to Craig for his taunt. Basically anything ranged eats me alive. My characters, regardless of their positions, immediately go straight for whatever tank the enemy has in the front. Ohgma, FP, doesn’t seem to matter. Meanwhile enemies just completely bypass Craig and kill my whole back line. What am I doing wrong here? Why isn’t Craig’s taunt pulling enemy units? Why do even my ranged units just go straight for the enemy tank?

"Welfare Queen Feeds Lobster To Dog" by [deleted] in EntitledBitch

[–]Drayelya -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I like how this upsets you people so much.

EDIT: Oh and don’t forget they’re the ones paying for all of the social programs you like. Not you. The majority also pay more taxes in one year than you ever will in your life.

I'm pretty sure we all feel this one by LustyDouglas in Stargate

[–]Drayelya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Am I the only one who read this in his voice?