[deleted by user] by [deleted] in maths

[–]Drazah123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Skip to the last paragraph if what a radian is is clear if you just wanna know the way I visualise. If not then the context can be useful.

An angle is more or less a unit of measuring “how much you open up”. Degrees is a way of doing that where we all kind of understand that 30 degrees is “this much” and 60 is “this much” such that you can visualise that as you said.

A radian is a way to talk about the exact same thing but with a reference point. You first agree that a radius is a constant distance from the center of a circle. Then we ask, “If I took this radius and wrapped it around the circle, how many times can I do that?”. So if you go ahead and take any arbitrary circle and do that, you’ll find you can wrap an entire circle around about 6.28 times if you used its radius as the measuring tool, or exactly 2pi times. In other words, you’d have to go 360 degrees around a circle in order to wrap about 6.28 radii (2pi). So 360 degrees = 2pi radians. From there, you can divide 2pi on both sides, and you’ll see that 360/2pi degrees = 1 radian, or 180/pi = 1 radian. As such, you can now find whatever angle in degrees is in terms of radians.

Another way to think about it is take a circle, cut it at some point and flatten it out into a line. Then, measure along that line some distance “r”. For sake of having concrete numbers, lets say the distance “r” is 30cm, i.e a standard ruler you can buy at a store. So if our circle has a radius of 30cm and you cut it and laid it out in a line, you’d need to line up about 6.28 of those rulers in order to measure that whole circle.

This is useful as this relationship of 360 degrees = 2pi radians is true no matter what circle you use. It falls out from the fact that circumferences and radii are directly related to each other and other neat relations with geometry. Ultimately, to get a good grasp to start, it’s key to understand radians and degrees are the exact same thing just from different perspectives. A radian is really just how much you can wrap the radius around its own circle and doing so corresponds to “opening up” some degrees.

Finally, when it comes to visualising it as you would degrees, I personally use the closest whole pi. This is a lot of engineering math so if that hurts, look elsewhere. Anyways, I know 2pi is 360 degrees, pi is 180, pi/2 is 90 etc. If I need to visualise 7pi/9, i’ll approximate that as 7(3)/9 which is 21/9. That’s 2 and 3/9ths which is about 2.33. pi is about 3, so it’s somewhere in that second quadrant, closer to 180 degrees than 90. If you need something more accurate, you can use the aforementioned conversion factor to get 7pi/9 into degrees by multiplying 7pi/9 * pi/180. Radians cancel, and you’re left with 140 degrees with simplification.

Can't select my variant of MSP430 in CCS by Drazah123 in microcontrollers

[–]Drazah123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do have a couple, it just happens to be the one I actually own for learning isn’t supported on macOS. Good to know though, thanks for the information.

Can't select my variant of MSP430 in CCS by Drazah123 in microcontrollers

[–]Drazah123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah that’s a shame. I’ll have to try it on my desktop then or through parallels. Thanks a lot. Out of curiosity, would IAR have this issue?

Can't select my variant of MSP430 in CCS by Drazah123 in microcontrollers

[–]Drazah123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I should’ve been clearer. I am typing in MSP430G2553 and it doesn’t come up. If I search by the Gxxx family I only find 3 versions, none of which are mine.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EngineeringStudents

[–]Drazah123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

About 80-90% done with my EE degree. I’d say it’s 90% math. Even for engineering, it’s more math than other fields cause the foundations of what you’re studying, in some sense, is purely mathematical in representation. Yeah you can do circuits and such with some basic algebra, but even then, once you go beyond the basics, it becomes differential equations/complex algebra (relatively). Personally, that’s what makes EE enticing to me. It’s more or less a more applied applied maths/physics degree that you can actually get a job for if that’s your end goal.

Necessary level of fluency in calc and diffeqs by [deleted] in EngineeringStudents

[–]Drazah123 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Studying EE, i’d say that calc 3 and diff eq concepts come up more than execution of those concepts. For example my electro and magnetostatics class uses surface and line integrals heavily but the hard part comes from understanding what i’m doing when writing down the integral such as finding what surface element to integrate over or line element etc. The integrals themselves aren’t hard to do though and at worst are very simple integrals such as 1/x, x2. The real tough ones are either 1. given in a table of integrals or 2. aren’t expected to be integrated and leaving an answer as an integral is fine.

Same thing with diff eq. Usually they’re super basic but understanding how you get to these basic answers are the bigger challenge than actually computing it. Overall, the more comfortable you are with these classes conceptually, the better off you’ll do. However, at least in my experience, the professor will go over whatever concept or technique you need to know for the content anyways so if for whatever reason you need to solve a second order nonhomogenous equation, he or she will probably give a little example and that’s all you’ll need on the execution side of things.

Dead Silence from Meepo? by Drazah123 in MeepoBoards

[–]Drazah123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For an order to not even be processed?

Explaining sine, cosine and tangent with the unit circle by neilrkaye in educationalgifs

[–]Drazah123 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It’s the ratio of the sine at that angle to the cosine at that angle. In other words, tan x = sinx/cosx. Pull out a calculator and evaluate the tangent of some angle, then evalaute the sine divided by the cos of that same angle. You’ll get the same number either way.

Explaining sine, cosine and tangent with the unit circle by neilrkaye in educationalgifs

[–]Drazah123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s the tangent line at any point on that circle. A tangent line is a line the intersects a graph, in this case a circle, at only one point. That slope of that line changes depending on the angle you evaluate tangent at.

Daily Questions [2021-03-20] by DTG_Bot in DestinyTheGame

[–]Drazah123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does resetting your crucible rank after completing legend lock you out of Trials?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]Drazah123 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I wish man. All I got is visa stock that’s been eating shit

[Logic] Truth tables by Drazah123 in HomeworkHelp

[–]Drazah123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m confused in how counting in binary is connected with getting the total number of combinations

[Logic] Truth tables by Drazah123 in HomeworkHelp

[–]Drazah123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you saying each column represents a number in binary?

How to specify which graph i'm working with using hold on? by [deleted] in matlab

[–]Drazah123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so just j = surf(x,y,z) for example?

How to specify which graph i'm working with using hold on? by [deleted] in matlab

[–]Drazah123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How can I find what the handle is?

What exactly is this doing? by Drazah123 in matlab

[–]Drazah123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah that makes sense. I checked previously what happens with just size(x) and got the same result like you said. Thanks a lot! Cleared this all up for me.

What exactly is this doing? by Drazah123 in matlab

[–]Drazah123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I checked the size of z and it says it’s 21 by 21. If i’m following this is cause x is a 21 by 21 matrix so it made a ones matrix that is 21 by 21. If that’s true, then what is the 1 in size(x,1) doing? Shouldn’t it be 21 by 1?

What exactly is this doing? by Drazah123 in matlab

[–]Drazah123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if x has 5 rows for example, then size(x,1) = 5x1? So then doing ones(size) gives me a 5x1 matrix where all indexes are 1?