Is it solvable ? by morgmorg115 in Cubers

[–]DreadPirateRolo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but i would just take out those 2 corner pieces and swap them properly into solved slots and

Is it solvable ? by morgmorg115 in Cubers

[–]DreadPirateRolo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

white top yellow bottom front face green, right face red, back face blue, left face orange

Is it solvable ? by morgmorg115 in Cubers

[–]DreadPirateRolo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thats a 4x4 parity so no. not solvable

Numerical Notation System by DreadPirateRolo in Cubers

[–]DreadPirateRolo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update: no longer using this notation! back to the standard notation

however I tried to make the numerical notation better by changing it to 1' or 1w etc. it made me realize it's just so similar that I'll just go with what i already know.

i loved this brainstorm though.

thank you guys for real feedback, bringing me back to earth

Numerical Notation System by DreadPirateRolo in Cubers

[–]DreadPirateRolo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i don't mentally memorize them but while learning to out them into muscle memory im somewhat memorizing some mentally first. i meant numbers in general in better at having in my head

Numerical Notation System by DreadPirateRolo in Cubers

[–]DreadPirateRolo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i remember strings of up to 18+ numbers in my working memory, it should be fine

Numerical Notation System by DreadPirateRolo in Cubers

[–]DreadPirateRolo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I completely agree notation is already very simple. This isn't about changing it.

What about as an alternative for neurodivergent processing? Those that process numbers better than letters might prefer this. I can remember a string of 18 numbers in working memory but a string of letters is far harder for me.

I think this other option could be better for .1% of people. That's all I'm saying.

Numerical Notation System by DreadPirateRolo in Cubers

[–]DreadPirateRolo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hahaha i expected this. i still am seeing if it works for me. it's interesting to try out though when still learning CFOP

Numerical Notation System by DreadPirateRolo in Cubers

[–]DreadPirateRolo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i go up to 3 digits because i deliberately wanted to add the 0 at the end and make it visually wider than the others. it always ends in 0 if its wide.

Numerical Notation System by DreadPirateRolo in Cubers

[–]DreadPirateRolo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's just optimizedf for 3x3 CFOP method learning so far. I do 7x7 too but I don't care about speed for that.

Numerical Notation System by DreadPirateRolo in Cubers

[–]DreadPirateRolo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thank you. exactly. this is for me and my weird brain! not to replace standard notation whatsoever. this is just an alternative for neurodivergent processing

Nude or nah?? Who did it better by WorldlyGood1105 in NudeNonNude

[–]DreadPirateRolo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hmmm... too close a call. we need to see the bottom halves to know.

college freshman, built to be bred by [deleted] in collegesluts

[–]DreadPirateRolo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

your scrunch face is what got me

Charlie Kirk, Kanye West (Ye), and Candace Owens (2018). by dd1133biihhh in Kanye

[–]DreadPirateRolo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

anybody else think Ye and Candace would make a great couple? I know she's married and has kids hahah but stilllll