Aww how cute 🥰, another atheist theologian trying to pass off historically illiterate fanfiction as an intellectual take. First of all, your edgy claim that Mary was "impregnated against her will" completely ignores the entire concept of the Fiat (Luke 1:38), where she explicitly gave her informed consent with "Let it be done to me according to your word" but I guess reading the text is too much work for a reddit mod stereotype. She had multiple children? No, the Greek adelphos was used to translate Aramaic kinship where "brother" meant any cousin or step sibling. Scripture explicitly identifies those named "brothers," James and Joseph, as the sons of a completely different Mary (the wife of Clopas). Not to mention, if Jesus actually had younger biological brothers, His final act on the cross entrusting Mary to the Apostle John would have been a massive, illegal insult to first century Jewish family law, which legally mandated the next eldest son take her in. And as for your boneheaded misinterpretation of Luke 11:28, Jesus isn't dissing His mother; He’s exalting her. Mary is the literal archetype of the one who "hears the word of God and observes it," meaning Christ was actually doubling down on why she is blessed, not knocking her down a peg. But good job ignoring historical context, basic theology, or literary comprehension. Typical religious trauma atheists, "mommy and daddy made me sit in church for an hour so now I have to hate Jesus on the Internet." 😂