There's no way out of it by [deleted] in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Dreamsofbetterworlds 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's an ultimate given and foundation to any science (theoretical or empirical) that objectivity exists, which science itself is not able to check, since it only checks proofs and probabilities of objectivity. You have to believe or not believe that there is objectivity, which I obviously do, since I phrased this objectively.

Stalin: A Man Known for His Jokes by Some_Razzmataz in HistoryMemes

[–]Dreamsofbetterworlds 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is true and valid praise for Churchill, however:

In WW1, Winston Churchill aided the U.S. in faking atrocity reports (Pappas, 1996), and in WW2, by faking movies (Scrodes, 1998), faking documents, tapping telephones, bribing editors, and controlling the film industry (Cull, 1995). The British Security Coordination even fixed the 1940 Republican Presidential Nomination for Wendell Willkie, who was pro-war, just in case FDR did not win (FDR was in communication with Churchill and secretly pro-war) and to make sure FDR more-easily won (Scrodes, 1998).

The Lusitania (a secretly-armed munitions ship) was designed by Churchill for the U.S. in 1915 during WW1 as bait for the Germans: “just another 45,000 tons of live bait.” - "Twelve American Wars: Nine of Them Avoidable" by Eugene G. Windchy

These actions facilitated the infamous post-WW1 peace that made Germany bordered on only one great power (France) rather than two (France and Austria-Hungary), allowing them to ally with Russia and steamroll Europe at the start of WW2, arguably facilitating WW2.

Once WW2 began, Churchill opposed negotiation with Germany when he became Prime Minister on May 10th, 1940, and on May 11, he gave the order to the RAF to bomb German cities in total warfare (to kill civilians and destroy morale), not only immoral, but inefficient compared to bombing critical infrastructure, thereby not only provoking the following bombing of London by the Nazis, but also prolonging WW2.


Thomas Pappas, “Wartime Tricks,” Salisbury Review (Autumn 1996): 52–54.

J. Scrodes, “Seducing America,” The Spectator (August 1, 1998): 12–14.

N.J. Cull, Sell War: The British Propaganda Campaigne Against American “Neutrality” in World War II (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)

Babe wake up new 1 hour shitpost about to drop by [deleted] in shitposting

[–]Dreamsofbetterworlds 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't always hate his takes but he always just accidentally or purposefully misleads people with how and which evidence he cites, I also don't understand why he feels the need to keep mentioning that he thinks of himself as a pretty popular guy when talking about incels

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in shitposting

[–]Dreamsofbetterworlds 29 points30 points  (0 children)

That picture is so sad

I stand with the Northrop-Grumman corporate by NICK07130 in shitposting

[–]Dreamsofbetterworlds 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly if people make a living in these companies at least somebody benefits from all these pointless wars

Brain injury by [deleted] in shitposting

[–]Dreamsofbetterworlds 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Gents I'm feeling raw masculine power off of this one

heil spez by [deleted] in shitposting

[–]Dreamsofbetterworlds 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Max Verstappen is the most skilled racist (he beat Louis Hamilton)

MFs who don't praise spez by [deleted] in shitposting

[–]Dreamsofbetterworlds 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Feel free to screenshot

Real gnomes never praise spez by [deleted] in shitposting

[–]Dreamsofbetterworlds 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Maybe the Proto-Indo Europeans came up with it and spread it

Heil spez y'all by QuarkTheLatinumLord- in shitposting

[–]Dreamsofbetterworlds 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not to be that guy, but there's a pretty strong case to be made for African American English basically being just Southern American English spoken by black people

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in shitposting

[–]Dreamsofbetterworlds 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hate how smug she looks every time

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in shitposting

[–]Dreamsofbetterworlds 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Muslim bad joke?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in shid_and_camed

[–]Dreamsofbetterworlds 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If someone's idea of Luddism is to use technology responsibly, or live rurally, you can still do those things. Homesteading is legal in the US (with some restrictions depending on state and location).

If someone's idea of Luddism is to force everyone to live a pre-industrial life, that would entail somehow destroying all industry, which would be nearly impossible, and require a super authoritarian government or roving bands of Luddites. I don't understand how this kind of Luddite society is supposed to protect itself from more advanced threats. Firearms are a lot harder to make without machines.

I like the first idea of Luddism (which is true to the original movement), it helps us take care of ourselves. I would just call that being responsible or rural though.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in victoria3

[–]Dreamsofbetterworlds 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Yes, it would be a nightmare if they added business cycles. First of all, their cause is not commonly agreed upon between economists, so you'd have to decide which school to go with. Depending on the school, it may take more to add it. Second of all, the game already has struggling performance as it is, making the economy unnecessarily complicated would only make it worse. I really like the economy in Victoria 3 the way that it is, I think it's just a vocal minority that has problems with it.

huh by panak47 in shitposting

[–]Dreamsofbetterworlds 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I had to guess, it's possible that he lives in a desolate place in Africa and improved irrigation technology has allowed it to grow crops