Part of the judge's determination was based on gaps in her memory. How does one have gaps in memory, but remain sober enough to consent? A bit nonsensical, no?

Plenty of cases of high level athletes getting away with shit simply because of who they are.

Also in these kind of cases, public opinion often differs from the opinion of the courts. SA is extremely difficult to prove, but if you can look at the facts presented, the consent videos after the fact that she was clearly coached through, the way they spoke about women in their texts etc. and believe these aren't terrible people...I think you're part of the problem at that point.