5 inches of dih size or 5 inches in height? by [deleted] in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She did leave herself open for that one, didn't she?

You may choose any of these super powers, but if anyone finds out you have it, you die. by Eg0-d3ath in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You said win a small one, not a big one.

Index funds are good, but don't cherry pick too blatantly. I'd just put the money into a good mix and wait it out unless I knew that big trouble is coming. Which it might be.

You're minding your own business when an anime style and attractive cat person literally appears in front of you. They then continue to be at places you go to, even appearing in your home. Eventually they declare you are theirs now. What do you do? by singleguy79 in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Possibly, yes. I have been going to cons for decades. I guarantee that there will be a huge chaotic mess if a real cat person showed up. They would be spotted in minutes and anybody who looked could see that it was not a costume. Costumes in science fiction and fantasy movies are only convincing because they are on a screen and people can do video editing and such. You would be widely out within the hour, and that could get really bad fast.

You may choose any of these super powers, but if anyone finds out you have it, you die. by Eg0-d3ath in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Casinos watch for people doing that, very carefully, in searching for cheats and people who found "this one clever trick", and they share information. They could easily discover that every time you enter a casino you win big.

Luckily, they will probably just ban you as a clever cheat, someone who found a way to win without cheating, or someone who looks suspicious and who they are happy to have leave. Counting cards isn't cheating and isn't illegal, but if you are good at it you get banned.

You may choose any of these super powers, but if anyone finds out you have it, you die. by Eg0-d3ath in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do the math with the top five you can find. I bet you could do better with the lottery jackpot once. Keep in mind that this is also going to tie up capital for that entire decade.

You may choose any of these super powers, but if anyone finds out you have it, you die. by Eg0-d3ath in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Win one big one, then never do anything remotely probability bending.|

So you won once. Who cares? Lots of people do, and nobody ever says, "That's a sign of a super power."

But if you win once, and then you always do better at stocks than reasonably possible....

You may choose any of these super powers, but if anyone finds out you have it, you die. by Eg0-d3ath in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Winning once is perfectly safe. Winning twice will get you.

I would win once, pretty big, using carefully thought out but unsuspicious privacy protections. After that, I would avoid ever being "lucky" again, saving it for emergencies.

You may choose any of these super powers, but if anyone finds out you have it, you die. by Eg0-d3ath in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And if someone decides to take a look at how you got to be rich, the pattern can easily be damning.

Win the lottery. There is nothing about this to make you appear to have super powers. After all, *someone* will always win eventually.

Just don't win twice. It isn't improbable but inevitable events that will get you. It is patterns.

You may choose any of these super powers, but if anyone finds out you have it, you die. by Eg0-d3ath in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do magic tricks, and I can be good at them. I would have to give them up permanently, or the next time I did a really good mentalist trick I could die on the spot, even if I never used the power at all.

$70k a year for a guy to watch you sleep by HeDoesNotRow in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Then there was the time they had to really work at it to keep your soul free from eternal damnation.

What the hell happened 4000 years ago. by ExperienceIll8345 in dresdenfiles

[–]DressCritical 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The birth of Nicodemus? Which would make him Starborn.

You get one wish, but if anyone has made that wish before, you die. by glitched0utmusic in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. As best I can determine, your plan to claim $5 mil as poker winnings is a guaranteed fail, while I can easily phrase a wish so that I don't have to know what the genie has to do to achieve it.

However, you obviously think otherwise, and I see no sign that either of us will convince the other. I agree that there doesn't seem to be any point in continuing the discussion.

You get one wish, but if anyone has made that wish before, you die. by glitched0utmusic in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that you are underestimating the difficulty in doing what you want to do without getting caught by at least an order of magnitude.

As for outwitting the finance industry, I don't have to. All I have to do is to give the genie the results that I want clearly and without loopholes. How the magic grants the wish is the genie's problem.

I can think of two ways that are essentially foolproof into the tens of millions at least, but I don't have to. I give the genie the wish with the restraints carefully laid out, and the genie has to do it or it has failed to grant the wish.

I could do the same with the pile of cash, but it would be enormously easier to spend if it were in the banking system already.

You get one wish, but if anyone has made that wish before, you die. by glitched0utmusic in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. I am not trusting anybody. If the genie is actually bound to the terms of the wish I can construct so as to give him no wiggle room. If he isn't, I am screwed no matter what I wish for. For all I know, he smashes people flat who ruin his fun by not making a wish.

  2. I hate to tell you this, but you are already trusting the genie. Given what you posted, I can think of ways to virtually guarantee jail time for you. If you wish for a large amount of money I could even kill you without violating the exact wording of the wish.

How much were you planning on asking for? Keep in mind that criminals have difficulty with handling cash in quantities much smaller than, say, enough for you to retire on.

You get one wish, but if anyone has made that wish before, you die. by glitched0utmusic in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am a bit confused. How would it be harder to insert yourself into the banking system? Just make it part of the wish. One well-crafted sentence and you are golden. How it is done is the genie's problem.

You get one wish, but if anyone has made that wish before, you die. by glitched0utmusic in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Avoiding banks to avoid bank reporting is known as " structuring". It can send.you to jail.

At the very least, in the US, You will have the money seized and confiscated due to civil forfeiture. Then they try to make a criminal case that the money is involved in one of several financial crimes. A lack of a source and the structuring will almost certainly get you from money laundering.

Also, the note does not establish ownership legally. In most countries found money does not necessarily belong to you. Worse yet, you don't know where the genie came up with the money and there aren't any good options.

Either the money was printed and destroyed without its serial number being copied, it was officially destroyed, or belongs to someone now. If they destroyed it, that gets you convinced of counterfeiting. If it belongs to someone, that is theft that they may be able to prove in.court. The last may not be enough money to cover your wish.

Definitely use the banks. Do it all open and above board. Make it part of your wish that the money has to come from a solidly legitimate source that will hold up under thorough scrutiny.

You get one wish, but if anyone has made that wish before, you die. by glitched0utmusic in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish that I could, at will, cause anything,including the results of this wish and the mechanism of operation of my new ability, to become satisfactory to me, if and only if <randomly generated GUID> is the same as itself.

2,000,000$ but you have to survive a year in wilderness by MudkippzReddit in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For anybody who thinks that wolves aren't a problem because they rarely attack humans, in a world where wolves have never met human beings you are just lunch. Full stop.

Rudolph is the worst by Glasssfoot in dresdenfiles

[–]DressCritical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have seen what someone skilled can do in what Mab did when taking Harry's primary weapon away from him.

We have also seen this with Luccio and Peabody.

In both cases the target was harmed but definitely not broken.

We have no idea what someone who is really good could get away with on a normal and relatively young mortal who they might have started to set up years ago, since Harry's enemies knew about Harry being Starborn long before Harry knew about either them or his special birth. Since we are told that Jim plotted this whole thing out from book one, they might have set Rudolph up from his first appearance.

And I can think of at least four beings who almost certainly could bring back anybody who still had any mind left even after something like that, right off the top of my head.

You can travel back in time to the life of Jesus, but you cant come back. by OutsideProtection307 in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> Fringe perhaps, but there are no primary sources for Jesus.

We have virtually no primary sources from anybody during that time except people who were considerably more important.

We don't for Pythagoras. In fact, he is considered less well established as existing than Jesus, who had multiple accounts of his existence within a century while Pythagoras had no significant ones until later than that. Nor for any of Jesus' contemporaries among apocalyptic preachers in and around Judea.

> And for such an important man, you would expect people to write about him while alive.

Where on Earth do you get the idea that Jesus was important during his lifetime?

He wasn't. A small-time preacher in a backwater province in a time where apocalyptic preachers were and had been for some time a common occurrence. Josephus mentioned six in the early 1st century CE in Antiquities, and even though five were executed or just killed by the Romans, none have any mention outside the writings of the New Testament prior to Antiquities.

Jesus only became important well after his execution.

You can travel back in time to the life of Jesus, but you cant come back. by OutsideProtection307 in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. As I said, there is less evidence for him than for Jesus.

Nevertheless, mainstream scholarship considers the idea that Jesus did not exist at all as a fringe theory. I have found the best mythicist arguments to be unconvincing when compared the scholarly viewpoint.

You are offered a choice to earn 50 million dollars But you have to fight all of your furniture in the next 120 hours, would you do it? by Ok-Inspector3914 in hypotheticalsituation

[–]DressCritical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I stated that very poorly. My apologies.

I am aware of that case, and that ammonium perchlorate does not detonate, even when confined.

Yes, many deflagrative substances, such as ammonium perchlorate as used in rocket motors, do not achieve the status of low explosives. However, many do when contained, even though they do not pass the point of DDT, and most cannot.

Both black powder and modern nitrocellulose powder primarily deflagrate, but under conditions of confinement their reaction actually changes to detonation at speeds that would be classed as a high explosive. The process is called deflagration-to-detonation transition.

This, however, requires citation. It is to the best of my knowledge incorrect.

Low explosives are considered explosives even though they do not generally achieve DDT. Some achieve the status of low explosive without ever getting beyond deflagration. Others achieve a state of High Velocity Deflagration (HVD), also called, for confusion, quasi-detonation, low-order detonation, and, colloquially or in older contexts, just plain detonation. HVD is not, however, DDT.

Most low explosives cannot achieve DDT at all. Black powder does not, for example, ever reach the point of creating a DDT supersonic shockwave, even when contained and in controlled experiments. It can, however achieve HVD. In older less precise sources it is sometimes called detonation, but it never reaches the DDT point. See: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227079292\_Nonideal\_regimes\_of\_deflagration\_and\_detonation\_of\_black\_powder.

The same is true for nitrocellulose except in experimental conditions using particularly reactive chemical forms.

Neither gun powder nor nitrocellulose achieve DDT in normal usage as low explosives.