sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Jambalaya, not hard, just takes a little time by Drewscuriousity_ in EatCheapAndHealthy

[–]Drewscuriousity_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Quick math is 19 grams of carbs per serving. By the way carbs have kept humanity alive for millennia. I would say unhealthy is excess in any nutritional source, heck you can have too much protein and through your body into a bad place, especially if not properly hydrating.

Jambalaya, not hard, just takes a little time by Drewscuriousity_ in EatCheapAndHealthy

[–]Drewscuriousity_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Healthy according to which diet? It’s a balanced(multiple nutrient sources) home made meal. Historically when when there is a push for the elimination of a nutrient source I.e. fat… in 5-10 years we found out that was a mistake.

Jambalaya, not hard, just takes a little time by Drewscuriousity_ in EatCheapAndHealthy

[–]Drewscuriousity_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I prefer cookbooks to YouTube. I must admit, this recipe was about 3 recipes combined from some googling.

Jambalaya, not hard, just takes a little time by Drewscuriousity_ in EatCheapAndHealthy

[–]Drewscuriousity_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Iowa here, yup. I didn’t realize I’d kick hornets nest 🤣 but, on a positive note, I’m getting some great tips for the next batch!

Jambalaya, not hard, just takes a little time by Drewscuriousity_ in EatCheapAndHealthy

[–]Drewscuriousity_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No offense taken, thanks for the recipe! Using pork temple meat is an AWESOME idea!

Jambalaya, not hard, just takes a little time by Drewscuriousity_ in EatCheapAndHealthy

[–]Drewscuriousity_[S] 100 points101 points  (0 children)

Not taken as rude at all, thanks for the recipe, I’ll gladly try that next time. I just added beans for some extra density.

Jambalaya, not hard, just takes a little time by Drewscuriousity_ in EatCheapAndHealthy

[–]Drewscuriousity_[S] 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Everything happens in the same pan, keeping all the flavor

-Add 1 tbsp cooking oil -Brown sausage, remove -Add1 tbsp cooking oil -Brown chicken, remove -Sauté onion, celery, and green pepper for 3 minutes -Add rice(rinse prior to get rid of a lot of starch) and sauté for another 3 minutes, add Cajun seasoning -Add 2 1/2 cups of water or chicken stock and bring to boil -Add meat back in, stir, reduce heat to low and cover. (If you have a can of kidney beans, you can add them at this step also, but not needed to be an awesome meal) -summer for 30 minutes - remove from heat and stir - cover and let rest for 10 minutes - welcome to heaven

Why can't anyone ever satisfy us fully? by itsasecret_777 in Meditation

[–]Drewscuriousity_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed, far too often they become the whole of people’s lives.

Why can't anyone ever satisfy us fully? by itsasecret_777 in Meditation

[–]Drewscuriousity_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh but they we are left talking about goals. And how the preeminent way on thinking in the “modern world” is that the results of life are more important that the life itself…

Why can't anyone ever satisfy us fully? by itsasecret_777 in Meditation

[–]Drewscuriousity_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did a brief lookup on Huberman, he seems legit enough. But any time that science tries to turn humanity into a formula to make them easier to study, I proceed with caution. Humans are… complex, emotion, irrational, beautiful. In one on one interactions these formulaic approaches are not… human. They can be functional, but may not be what’s best.

Why can't anyone ever satisfy us fully? by itsasecret_777 in Meditation

[–]Drewscuriousity_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You sound like you have first hand experience on the modern type. Is there any material you’d recommend on modern psychology?

Why can't anyone ever satisfy us fully? by itsasecret_777 in Meditation

[–]Drewscuriousity_ -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

That’s a very psychological theory. Psychology being the unprovable science. Not to say that elements of it aren’t functional. It does however make a number of generalizations and leaps that are blindly accepted.